Clampless off-pump versus conventional coronary artery revascularization: A propensity score analysis of 788 patients

Circulation

Volumn 126, Issue 11 SUPPL.1, 2012, Pages

  Börgermann, Jochen ^a   Hakim, Kavous ^a   Renner, André ^a   Parsa, Amin ^a   Aboud, Anas ^a   Becker, Tobias ^a   Masshoff, Marc ^a   Zittermann, Armin ^a   Gummert, Jan Fritz ^a   Kuss, Oliver ^b  

^a RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

^b MARTIN LUTHER UNIVERSITY HALLE WITTENBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

anastomotic device; aortic manipulation; clampless; coronary artery bypass grafting; off pump surgery

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AORTA BALLOON; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE; CLAMPLESS OFF PUMP CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY RECANALIZATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FORWARD HEART FAILURE; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; OFF PUMP CORONARY SURGERY; OVERALL SURVIVAL; PERIOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPENSITY SCORE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; STROKE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; THORACOTOMY; VEIN ANASTOMOSIS;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; CONSTRICTION; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS, OFF-PUMP; EMBOLISM; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK; SELECTION BIAS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84866451590     PISSN: 00097322     EISSN: 15244539     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.084285     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Sellke FW, DiMaio JM, Caplan LR, Ferguson TB, Gardner TJ, Hiratzka LF, Isselbacher EM, Lytle BW, Mack MJ, Murkin JM, Robbins RC. Comparing on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: numerous studies but few conclusions: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association council on cardiovascular surgery and anesthesia in collaboration with the interdisciplinary working group on quality of care and outcomes research. Circulation. 2005;111: 2858-2864.
2. Kuss O, von Salviati B, Börgermann J. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis of propensity score analyses. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;140: 829-835, 835.e1-835.e13.
3. Wijeysundera DN, Beattie WS, Djaiani G, Rao V, Borger MA, Karkouti K, Cusimano RJ. Off-pump coronary artery surgery for reducing mortality and morbidity: meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:872-882.
4. Panesar SS, Athanasiou T, Nair S, Rao C, Jones C, Nicolaou M, Darzi A. Early outcomes in the elderly: a meta-analysis of 4921 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: comparison between off-pump and on-pump techniques. Heart. 2006;92:1808-1816.
5. Puskas JD, Thourani VH, Kilgo P, Cooper W, Vassiliades T, Vega JD, Morris C, Chen E, Schmotzer BJ, Guyton RA, Lattouf OM. Off-pump coronary artery bypass disproportionately benefits high-risk patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88:1142-1147.
6. Cheng DC, Bainbridge D, Martin JE, Novick RJ. Does off-pump coronary artery bypass reduce mortality, morbidity, and resource utilization when compared with conventional coronary artery bypass? A meta-analysis of randomized trials. Anesthesiology. 2005;102:188-203.
7. Afilalo J, Rasti M, Ohayon SM, Shimony A, Eisenberg MJ. Off-pump vs on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: an updated meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomized trials. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:1257-1267.
8. Sedrakyan A, Wu AW, Parashar A, Bass EB, Treasure T. Off-pump surgery is associated with reduced occurrence of stroke and other morbidity as compared with traditional coronary artery bypass grafting: a meta-analysis of systematically reviewed trials. Stroke. 2006;37: 2759-2769.
9. Bucerius J, Gummert JF, Borger MA, Walther T, Doll N, Onnasch JF, Metz S, Falk V, Mohr FW. Stroke after cardiac surgery: a risk factor analysis of 16,184 consecutive adult patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;75: 472-478.
10. Calafiore AM, Di Mauro M, Teodori G, Di Giammarco G, Cirmeni S, Contini M, Iaco AL, Pano M. Impact of aortic manipulation on incidence of cerebrovascular accidents after surgical myocardial revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;73:1387-1393.
11. Lev-Ran O, Braunstein R, Sharony R, Kramer A, Paz Y, Mohr R, Uretzky G. No-touch aorta off-pump coronary surgery: the effect on stroke. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;129:307-313.
12. Emmert MY, Seifert B, Wilhelm M, Grunenfelder J, Falk V, Salzberg SP. Aortic no-touch technique makes the difference in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;142:1499-1506.
13. Puskas JD, Halkos ME, Balkhy H, Caskey M, Connolly M, Crouch J, Diegeler A, Gummert J, Harringer W, Subramanian V, Sutter F, Matschke K. Evaluation of the PAS-Port Proximal Anastomosis System in coronary artery bypass surgery (the EPIC trial). J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;138:125-132.
14. Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika. 1983;70:41-55.
15. Rubin DB. Using propensity scores to help design observational studies: application to the tobacco litigation. Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol. 2001;2:169-188.
16. Austin PC. Propensity-score matching in the cardiovascular surgery literature from 2004 to 2006: a systematic review and suggestions for improvement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;134:1128-1135.
17. Mishra M, Malhotra R, Karlekar A, Mishra Y, Trehan N. Propensity case-matched analysis of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with atheromatous aorta. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;82:608-614.
18. Racz MJ, Hannan EL, Isom OW, Subramanian VA, Jones RH, Gold JP, Ryan TJ, Hartman A, Culliford AT, Bennett E, Lancey RA, Rose EA. A comparison of short-and long-term outcomes after off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery with sternotomy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:557-564.
19. Mack MJ, Pfister A, Bachand D, Emery R, Magee MJ, Connolly M, Subramanian V. Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with and without cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with multivessel disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;127:167-173.
20. Roach GW, Kanchuger M, Mangano CM, Newman M, Nussmeier N, Wolman R, Aggarwal A, Marschall K, Graham SH, Ley C. Adverse cerebral outcomes after coronary bypass surgery: Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group and the Ischemia Research and Education Foundation Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1857-1863.
21. Guerrieri Wolf L, Abu-Omar Y, Choudhary BP, Pigott D, Taggart DP. Gaseous and solid cerebral microembolization during proximal aortic anastomoses in off-pump coronary surgery: the effect of an aortic sidebiting clamp and two clampless devices. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;133:485-493.
22. Peel GK, Stamou SC, Dullum MK, Hill PC, Jablonski KA, Bafi AS, Boyce SW, Petro KR, Corso PJ. Chronologic distribution of stroke after minimally invasive versus conventional coronary artery bypass. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:752-756.
23. Magee MJ, Coombs LP, Peterson ED, Mack MJ. Patient selection and current practice strategy for off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Circulation. 2003;108(Suppl 1):II9-II14.
24. Rothwell PM. External validity of randomised controlled trials: "to whom do the results of this trial apply?" Lancet. 2005;365:82-93.
25. Kuss O, Legler T, Börgermann J. Treatments effects from randomized trials and propensity score analyses were similar in similar populations in an example from cardiac surgery. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:1076-1084.
26. Kuss O, Börgermann J. Do higher-risk patients benefit from off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting? Evidence from an ecologic analysis of randomized trials. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;142:e117-e122.
27. Merie C, Kober L, Olsen PS, Andersson C, Jensen JS, Torp-Pedersen C. Risk of stroke after coronary artery bypass grafting: effect of age and comorbidities. Stroke. 2012;43:38-43.
28. Sun JC, Teoh KH, Lamy A, Sheth T, Ellins ML, Jung H, Yusuf S, Anand S, Connolly S, Whitlock RP, Eikelboom JW. Randomized trial of aspirin and clopidogrel versus aspirin alone for the prevention of coronary artery bypass graft occlusion: the Preoperative Aspirin and Postoperative Antiplatelets in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting study. Am Heart J. 2010; 160:1178-1184.
29. Kulik A, Le May MR, Voisine P, Tardif JC, Delarochelliere R, Naidoo S, Wells GA, Mesana TG, Ruel M. Aspirin plus clopidogrel versus aspirin alone after coronary artery bypass grafting: the clopidogrel after surgery for coronary artery disease (CASCADE) Trial. Circulation. 2010;122: 2680-2687.
30. Gao G, Zheng Z, Pi Y, Lu B, Lu J, Hu S. Aspirin plus clopidogrel therapy increases early venous graft patency after coronary artery bypass surgery a single-center, randomized, controlled trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 56:1639-1643.
31. Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE, Goodney PP, Wennberg DE, Lucas FL. Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2117-2127.
32. Hannan EL, Wu C, Ryan TJ, Bennett E, Culliford AT, Gold JP, Hartman A, Isom OW, Jones RH, McNeil B, Rose EA, Subramanian VA. Do hospitals and surgeons with higher coronary artery bypass graft surgery volumes still have lower risk-adjusted mortality rates? Circulation. 2003; 108:795-801.
33. Lapar DJ, Mery CM, Kozower BD, Kern JA, Kron IL, Stukenborg GJ, Ailawadi G. The effect of surgeon volume on mortality for off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;143: 854-863.
34. Puskas JD, Mack MJ, Smith CR. On-pump versus off-pump CABG. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:851.