Old and new perspectives on peritoneal dialysis in italy emerging from the peritoneal dialysis study group census

Peritoneal Dialysis International

Volumn 32, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 558-565

  Marinangeli, Giancarlo ^a   Cabiddu, Gianfranca ^b   Neri, Loris ^c   Viglino, Giusto ^c   Russo, Roberto ^d   Teatini, Ugo ^e  

^a Ospedale Maria SS dello Splendore   (Italy)

^b BROTZU HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^c Ospedale San Lazzaro   (Italy)

^d POLICLINICO   (Italy)

^e Azienda Ospedaliera   (Italy)

Author keywords

Assisted PD; EPS; Incremental dialysis; Nephrology referral; Technique failure

Indexed keywords

IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE AGENT; STEROID; TAMOXIFEN;

ABDOMINAL SURGERY; ARTICLE; AUTOMATED PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; CONVALESCENCE; CULTURE TECHNIQUE; DEATH; DETERIORATION; DIALYSIS CATHETER; ECHOGRAPHY; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HEMODIALYSIS; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTESTINE TRANSIT TIME; ITALY; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LAPAROSCOPY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NEPHROLOGIST; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATIENT REFERRAL; PERITONEAL CATHETER; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; PERITONEAL FIBROSIS; PERITONITIS; POPULATION RESEARCH; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SUPRAPUBIC CATHETERIZATION; ULTRAFILTRATION;

CENSUSES; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; ITALY; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS, CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY; PERITONEAL FIBROSIS; PERITONITIS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SURVIVAL RATE;

EID: 84866442190     PISSN: 08968608     EISSN: 17184304     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3747/pdi.2011.00112     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Viglino G, Neri L, Alloatti S, Cabiddu G, Cocchi R, Limido A, et al. Analysis of the factors conditioning the diffusion of peritoneal dialysis in Italy. Nephrol Dial transplant 2007; 22:3601-5.
2. Società Italiana di Nefrologia (SIN). Registro Italiano di Dialisi e trapianto. Italy: SIN; 2011 [data for 2009]: 14,19. [Available online at: http://www.sin-ridt.org/Italia/Report2009/REPORT%20RIDT%202009.pdf; accessed 11January 2012]
3. Società Italiana di Nefrologia (SIN), Gruppo di Studio di Dialisi Peritoneale. La Scelta della terapia Dialitica [da dicembre 2006 a luglio 2007]. Italy: SIN; 2006. [Available online at: http://www.dialisiperitoneale.org/files/questionario/scelta_trattamento_dialitico.pdf; accessed 11January 2012]
4. Cabiddu G, Viglino G, Neri L, Filippini A, Limido A, Luchi L, et al. La scelta del trattamento dialitico. Risultati di un questionario del Gruppo di Studio di Dialisi Peritoneale. G Ital Nefrol 2008; 25(Suppl 39):S40.
5. Viglino G, Neri L. Theory and reality in the selection of peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int 2008; 28:480-3.
6. United States Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, US Renal Data System (USRDS). 2010 Annual Data Report: Atlas of Chronic Kidney Disease and End-Stage Renal Disease in the United States. Bethesda, MD; USRDS; 2010.
7. Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI). Treatment of Stage Organ Failure in Canada, 1999 to 2008. 2010 Annual Report. Ottawa, ON: CIHI; 2010.
8. Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (ANZDATA). The 32nd Report: 2009. Adelaide, Australia: ANZDATA; 2009.
9. European Renal Association (ERA)-European Dialysis and Transplant Association (EDTA). ERA-EDTA Registry Annual Report 2008. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Academic Medical Center, Department of Medical Informatics; 2010.
10. Perl J, Hasan O, Bargman JM, Jiang D, Na Y, Gill JS, et al. Impact of dialysis modality on survival after kidney transplant failure. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2011; 6:582-90.
11. De Vecchi AF, Scalamogna A, Finazzi S, Colucci P, Ponticelli C. Preliminary evaluation of incremental peritoneal dialysis in 25 patients. Perit Dial Int 2000; 20:412-17.
12. Viglino G, Neri L, Barbieri S. Incremental peritoneal dialysis: effects on the choice of dialysis modality, residual renal function and adequacy. Kidney Int Suppl 2008; (108):S52-5.
13. Ansell D, Feehally J, Fogarty D, Inward C, Tomson CRV, Warwick G, et al., eds. UK Renal Registry 12th Annual Report (December 2009). Nephron Clin Pract 2010; 115(Suppl 1):c1-c319.
14. Schaubel DE, Blake PG, Fenton SS. Effect of renal center characteristics on mortality and technique failure on peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int 2001; 60:1517-24.
15. Huisman RM, Nieuwenhuizen MG, Th de Charro F. Patient-related and centre-related factors influencing technique survival of peritoneal dialysis in the Netherlands. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2002; 17:1655-60.
16. Afolalu B, Troidle L, Osayimwen O, Bhargava J, Kitsen J, Finkelstein FO. Technique failure and center size in a large cohort of peritoneal dialysis patients in a defined geographic area. Perit Dial Int 2009; 29:292-6.
17. Kolesnyk I, Dekker FW, Boeschoten EW, Krediet RT. Time-dependent reasons for peritoneal dialysis technique failure and mortality. Perit Dial Int 2010; 30:170-7.
18. Lo WK, Bargman JM, Burkart J, Krediet RT, Pollock C, Kawanishi H, et al. Guideline on targets for solute and fluid removal in adult patients on chronic peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int 2006; 26:520-2.
19. Le Registre de Dialyse Péritonéale de Langue Française (RDPLF). Profils (Adultes, France Métropolitaine)-Année 2010: Pourcentage des Patients Autonomes ou Aidés par un Tiers en Fonction de l'Âge [web page]. France: RDPLF; 2011. [Available at: http://www.rdplf.org/profils/515-profil-2010.html; accessed 11January 2012]
20. Li PK, Szeto CC, Piraino B, Bernardini J, Figueiredo AE, Gupta A, et al. Peritoneal dialysis-related infections recommendations: 2010 update. Perit Dial Int 2010; 30:393-423.
21. Remon Rodriguez C, Quiros Ganga PL, Gil Cunquero JM, Ros Ruiz S, Aresté Fosalba N, Ruiz Fernández A, et al. Ten years of peritoneal dialysis in Andalusia (1999-2008): epidemiologic data, types of treatment, peritonitis, comorbidity and survival patients and technique. Nefrologia 2010; 30:46-53.
22. Nessim SJ, Bargman JM, Austin PC, Nisenbaum R, Jassal SV. Predictors of peritonitis in patients on peritoneal dialysis: results of a large, prospective Canadian database. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2009; 4:1195-200.
23. Brown MC, Simpson K, Kerssens JJ, Mactier RA. Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis in the new millennium: a national cohort study. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2009; 4:1222-9.
24. Johnson DW, Cho Y, Livingston BE, Hawley CM, McDonald SP, Brown FG, et al. Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis: incidence, predictors, and outcomes. Kidney Int 2010; 77:904-12.
25. Kawanishi H, Kawaguchi Y, Fukui H, Hara S, Imada A, Kubo H, et al. Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis in Japan: a prospective, controlled, multicenter study. Am J Kidney Dis 2004; 44:729-37.
26. Summers AM, Clancy MJ, Syed F, Harwood N, Brenchley PE, Augustine T, et al. Single-center experience of encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis in patients on peritoneal dialysis for end-stage renal failure. Kidney Int 2005; 68:2381-8.
27. Lee HY, Kim BS, Choi HY, Park HC, Kang SW, Choi KH, et al. Sclerosing encapsulating peritonitis as a complication of long-term continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in Korea. Nephrology (Carlton) 2003; 8(Suppl):S33-9.
28. Trigka K, Dousdampanis P, Chu M, Khan S, Ahmad M, Bargman JM, et al. Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis: a single-center experience and review of the literature. Int Urol Nephrol 2011; 43:519-26.
29. Gokal R, Alexander S, Ash S, Chen TW, Danielson A, Holmes C, et al. Peritoneal catheters and exit-site practices toward optimum peritoneal access: 1998 update. Perit Dial Int 1998; 18:11-33.
30. Figueiredo A, Goh BL, Jenkins S, Johnson DW, Mactier R, Ramalakshmi S, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for peritoneal access. Perit Dial Int 2010; 30:424-9.