Benefits of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in high-risk patients

Circulation

Volumn 126, Issue 11 SUPPL.1, 2012, Pages

  Marui, Akira ^a,b   Okabayashi, Hitoshi ^c   Komiya, Tatsuhiko ^d   Tanaka, Shiro ^b   Furukawa, Yutaka ^e   Kita, Toru ^e   Kimura, Takeshi ^a   Sakata, Ryuzo ^a  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b KYOTO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^c IWATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^d KURASHIKI CENTRAL HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^e KOBE CITY MEDICAL CENTER GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

coronary artery bypass graft; high risk populations; off pump surgery

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVENTIONAL ON PUMP CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORONARY ARTERY SURGERY; DISEASE REGISTRY; FEMALE; HEART INFARCTION; HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; OFF PUMP CORONARY SURGERY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; STROKE;

AGED; CAUSE OF DEATH; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS, OFF-PUMP; CORONARY DISEASE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HUMANS; JAPAN; MALE; META-ANALYSIS AS TOPIC; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; REGISTRIES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84866437384     PISSN: 00097322     EISSN: 15244539     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.083873     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Sellke FW, Chu LM, Cohn WE. Current state of surgical myocardial revascularization. Circ J. 2010;74:1031-1037.
2. Hueb W, Lopes NH, Pereira AC, Hueb AC, Soares PR, Favarato D, Vieira RD, Lima EG, Garzillo CL, Paulitch Fda S, Cesar LA, Gersh BJ, Ramires JA. Five-year follow-up of a randomized comparison between off-pump and on-pump stable multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting. The MASS III Trial. Circulation. 2010;122:S48-S52.
3. Moller CH, Perko MJ, Lund JT, Andersen LW, Kelbaek H, Madsen JK, Winkel P, Gluud C, Steinbruchel DA. No major differences in 30-day outcomes in high-risk patients randomized to off-pump versus on-pump coronary bypass surgery: The best bypass surgery trial. Circulation. 2010;121:498-504.
4. Shroyer AL, Grover FL, Hattler B, Collins JF, McDonald GO, Kozora E, Lucke JC, Baltz JH, Novitzky D, Veterans Affairs Randomized On/Off Bypass (ROOBY) Study Group. On-pump versus off-pump coronaryartery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1827-1837.
5. Hernandez F Jr, Brown JR, Likosky DS, Clough RA, Hess AL, Roth RM, Ross CS, Whited CM, O'Connor GT, Klemperer JD. Neurocognitive outcomes of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass: A prospective randomized controlled trial. The Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84: 1897-1903.
6. Li Z, Denton T, Yeo KK, Parker JP, White R, Young JN, Amsterdam EA. Off-pump bypass surgery and postoperative stroke: California coronary bypass outcomes reporting program. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;90:753-759.
7. Brizzio ME, Zapolanski A, Shaw RE, Sperling JS, Mindich BP. Strokerelated mortality in coronary surgery is reduced by the off-pump approach. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;89:19-23.
8. Chu D, Bakaeen FG, Dao TK, Lemaire SA, Coselli JS, Huh J. On-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in a cohort of 63,000 patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;87:1820-1826; discussion 1826-1827.
9. Puskas JD, Kilgo PD, Lattouf OM, Thourani VH, Cooper WA, Vassiliades TA, Chen EP, Vega JD, Guyton RA. Off-pump coronary bypass provides reduced mortality and morbidity and equivalent 10-year survival. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;86:1139-1146; discussion 1146.
10. Hannan EL, Wu C, Smith CR, Higgins RS, Carlson RE, Culliford AT, Gold JP, Jones RH. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: Differences in short-term outcomes and in long-term mortality and need for subsequent revascularization. Circulation. 2007;116: 1145-1152.
11. Puskas JD, Edwards FH, Pappas PA, O'Brien S, Peterson ED, Kilgo P, Ferguson TB Jr. Off-pump techniques benefit men and women and narrow the disparity in mortality after coronary bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84:1447-1454; discussion 1454-1446.
12. Committee for Scientific Affairs, Sakata R, Fujii Y, Kuwano H. Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery in Japan during 2009: annual report by the Japanese Association for Thoracic Surger. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;59:636-667.
13. Sakata R, Fujii Y, Kuwano H. Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery in Japan during 2008: Annual report by the Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;58:356-383.
14. Committee for Scientific Affairs, Ueda Y, Fujii Y, Kuwano H. Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery in Japan during 2007. Annual report by the Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;57:488-513.
15. Kimura T, Morimoto T, Furukawa Y, Nakagawa Y, Shizuta S, Ehara N, Taniguchi R, Doi T, Nishiyama K, Ozasa N, Saito N, Hoshino K, Mitsuoka H, Abe M, Toma M, Tamura T, Haruna Y, Imai Y, Teramukai S, Fukushima M, Kita T. Long-term outcomes of coronary-artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention for multivessel coronary artery disease in the bare-metal stent era. Circulation. 2008;118: S199-S209.
16. Nashef SA, Roques F, Michel P, Gauducheau S, Lemeshow S, Salamon R. European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999;16:9-13.
17. Roques F. The logistic EuroSCORE. Eur Heart J. 2003;24:882.
18. Serruys PW, Ong AT, van Herwerden LA, Sousa JE, Jatene A, Bonnier JJ, Schonberger JP, Buller N, Bonser R, Disco C, Backx B, Hugenholtz PG, Firth BG, Unger F. Five-year outcomes after coronary stenting versus bypass surgery for the treatment of multivessel disease-the final analysis of the Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study (ARTS) randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:575-581.
19. Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika. 1983;70:41-55.
20. Afilalo J, Rasti M, Ohayon SM, Shimony A, Eisenberg MJ. Off-pump vs. on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: An updated meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomized trials. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:1257-1267.
21. Cheng DC, Bainbridge D, Martin JE, Novick RJ, Evidence-Based Perioperative Clinical Outcomes Research Group. Does off-pump coronary artery bypass reduce mortality, morbidity, and resource utilization when compared with conventional coronary artery bypass? A meta-analysis of randomized trial. Anesthesiology. 2005;102:188-203.
22. Wijeysundera DN, Beattie WS, Djaiani G, Rao V, Borger MA, Karkouti K, Cusimano RJ. Off-pump coronary artery surgery for reducing mortality and morbidity: Meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:872-882.
23. Moller CH, Penninga L, Wetterslev J, Steinbruchel DA, Gluud C. Clinical outcomes in randomized trials of off-vs. on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: Systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:2601-2616.
24. Sedrakyan A, Wu AW, Parashar A, Bass EB, Treasure T. Off-pump surgery is associated with reduced occurrence of stroke and other morbidity as compared with traditional coronary artery bypass grafting: A meta-analysis of systematically reviewed trials. Stroke. 2006;37: 2759-2769.
25. Puskas JD, Kilgo PD, Kutner M, Pusca SV, Lattouf O, Guyton RA. Off-pump techniques disproportionately benefit women and narrow the gender disparity in outcomes after coronary artery bypass surgery. Circulation. 2007;116:I192-199.
26. Kobayashi J, Tashiro T, Ochi M, Yaku H, Watanabe G, Satoh T, Tagusari O, Nakajima H, Kitamura S, Japanese Off-Pump Coronary Revascularization Investigation (JOCRI) Study Group. Early outcome of a randomized comparison of off-pump and on-pump multiple arterial coronary revascularization. Circulation. 2005;112:I338-I343.