Anatomical Hip Range of Motion After Implantation During Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Large Change in Pelvic Inclination

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 27, Issue 9, 2012, Pages

  Miki, Hidenobu ^a   Kyo, Takayuki ^a   Sugano, Nobuhiko ^b  

^a OSAKA NATIONAL HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^b OSAKA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Japan)

Author keywords

Acetabular cup orientation; Functional pelvic plane; Pelvic inclination; Positional change; Preoperative planning; Total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ABDUCTION; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY HEIGHT; BODY MASS; BODY WEIGHT; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; JOINT MOBILITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POSITION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RANGE OF MOTION; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT PLANNING;

EID: 84866433398     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.03.002     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Chen P.Y., Wu C.T., Hou C.H., Hou S.M. Loosening of total hip arthroplasty with a prosthesis employing a skirted femoral head. J Formos Med Assoc 2005, 104:370.
2. Shon W.Y., Baldini T., Peterson M.G., et al. Impingement in total hip arthroplasty a study of retrieved acetabular components. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20:427.
3. Barrack R.L. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: implant design and orientation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2003, 11:89.
4. Gambera D., Carta S., Crainz E., et al. Metallosis due to impingement between the socket and the femoral head in a total hip prosthesis. A case report. Acta Biomed 2002, 73:85.
5. Iida H., Kaneda E., Takada H., et al. Metallosis due to impingement between the socket and the femoral neck in a metal-on-metal bearing total hip prosthesis. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999, 81:400.
6. Bader R., Steinhauser E., Zimmermann S., et al. Differences between the wear couples metal-on-polyethylene and ceramic-on-ceramic in the stability against dislocation of total hip replacement. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2004, 15:711.
7. Grammatopoulos G., Pandit H., Glyn-Jones S., et al. Optimal acetabular orientation for hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010, 92:1072.
8. De Haan R., Pattyn C., Gill H.S., et al. Correlation between inclination of the acetabular component and metal ion levels in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008, 90:1291.
9. Gilliam J., Brunt D., MacMillan M., et al. Relationship of the pelvic angle to the sacral angle: measurement of clinical reliability and validity. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1994, 20:193.
10. Lembeck B., Mueller O., Reize P., Wuelker N. Pelvic tilt makes acetabular cup navigation inaccurate. Acta Orthop 2005, 76:517.
11. Babisch J.W., Layher F., Amiot L.P. The rationale for tilt-adjusted acetabular cup navigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008, 90:357.
12. Nishihara S., Sugano N., Nishii T., et al. Measurements of pelvic flexion angle using three-dimensional computed tomography. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003, 411:140.
13. Eckman K., Hafez M.A., Ed F., et al. Accuracy of pelvic flexion measurements from lateral radiographs. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006, 451:154.
14. D'Lima D.D., Urquhart A.G., Buehler K.O., et al. The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000, 82:315.
15. Jerosch J., Filler T.J., Peuker E.T. The cartilage of the tibiofibular joint: a source for autologous osteochondral grafts without damaging weight-bearing joint surfaces. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2002, 122:217.
16. Seki M., Yuasa N., Ohkuni K. Analysis of optimal range of socket orientations in total hip arthroplasty with use of computer-aided design simulation. J Orthop Res 1998, 16:513.
17. Nadzadi M.E., Pedersen D.R., Yack H.J., et al. Kinematics, kinetics, and finite element analysis of commonplace maneuvers at risk for total hip dislocation. J Biomech 2003, 36:577.
18. Miki H., Yamanashi W., Nishii T., et al. Anatomic hip range of motion after implantation during total hip arthroplasty as measured by a navigation system. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22:946.
19. Widmer K.H., Majewski M. The impact of the CCD-angle on range of motion and cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Biomech 2005, 20:723.
20. Widmer K.H., Zurfluh B. Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion. J Orthop Res 2004, 22:815.
21. Yoshimine F. The influence of the oscillation angle and the neck anteversion of the prosthesis on the cup safe-zone that fulfills the criteria for range of motion in total hip replacements. The required oscillation angle for an acceptable cup safe-zone. J Biomech 2005, 38:125.
22. Gottschalk S., Lin M.C., Manocha D. 1996. OBBTree: a hierarchical structure for rapid interference detection. SIGGRAPH '96 Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques 1996, 171. ACM Press, New York.
23. Sugano N., Sasama T., Sato Y., et al. Accuracy evaluation of surface-based registration methods in a computer navigation system for hip surgery performed through a posterolateral approach. Comput Aided Surg 2001, 6:195.
24. Kitada M., Nakamura N., Iwana D., et al. Evaluation of the accuracy of computed tomography-based navigation for femoral stem orientation and leg length discrepancy. J Arthroplasty 2011, 26:674.
25. Hananouchi T., Takao M., Nishii T., et al. Comparison of navigation accuracy in THA between the mini-anterior and -posterior approaches. Int J Med Robot 2009, 5:20.
26. Kalteis T., Handel M., Bäthis H., et al. Imageless navigation for insertion of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty: is it as accurate as CT-based navigation?. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006, 88:163.
27. Zajac F.E. Muscle and tendon: properties, models, scaling, and application to biomechanics and motor control. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 1989, 17:359.
28. Woolson S.T., Maloney W.J., Schurman D.J. Time-related improvement in the range of motion of the hip after total replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985, 67:1251.
29. Hagio K., Sugano N., Nishii T., et al. A novel system of four-dimensional motion analysis after total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 2004, 22:665.