Prediction of neonatal metabolic acidosis in women with a singleton term pregnancy in cephalic presentation: An external validation study

American Journal of Perinatology

Volumn 29, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 681-686

  Schuit, Ewoud ^a   Amer Wahlin, Isis ^b   Groenwold, Rolf H H ^a   Mol, Ben W J ^c   Moons, Karel G M ^a   Kwee, Anneke ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^b KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^c ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

birth asphyxia; external validation; metabolic acidosis; neonate; prognostic model

Indexed keywords

AMNION FLUID; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; CESAREAN SECTION; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DISEASE COURSE; FEMALE; FETUS; GESTATIONAL AGE; HIGH RISK PREGNANCY; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; INTRAPARTUM CARE; LABOR ONSET; MATERNAL DIABETES MELLITUS; MECONIUM; METABOLIC ACIDOSIS; MODEL; NEWBORN; NEWBORN DISEASE; PARITY; PREDICTION; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); RISK FACTOR; SAINT MARTIN (DUTCH); ST SEGMENT; VALIDATION STUDY;

ACIDOSIS; AMNIOTIC FLUID; CESAREAN SECTION; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; LABOR PRESENTATION; LABOR, INDUCED; MECONIUM; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PARITY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY, HIGH-RISK;

EID: 84866422585     PISSN: 07351631     EISSN: 10988785     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1314888     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Goodwin TM, Belai I, Hernandez P, Durand M, Paul RH. Asphyxial complications in the term newborn with severe umbilical acidemia. Am J Obstet Gynecol: 1992; 167 1506 1512 (Pubitemid 23009277)
2. Lavrijsen SW, Uiterwaal CS, Stigter RH, de Vries LS, Visser GH, Groenendaal F. Severe umbilical cord acidemia and neurological outcome in preterm and full-term neonates. Biol Neonate: 2005; 88 27 34 (Pubitemid 40911578)
3. van de Riet JE, Vandenbussche FP, Le Cessie S, Keirse MJ. Newborn assessment and long-term adverse outcome: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol: 1999; 180 1024 1029 (Pubitemid 29200571)
4. van den Berg PP, Nelen WL, Jongsma HW., et al. Neonatal complications in newborns with an umbilical artery pH<7.00. Am J Obstet Gynecol: 1996; 175 1152 1157 (Pubitemid 26398971)
5. Williams KP, Singh A. The correlation of seizures in newborn infants with significant acidosis at birth with umbilical artery cord gas values. Obstet Gynecol: 2002; 100 557 560 (Pubitemid 35246145)
6. Westerhuis ME, Schuit E, Kwee A., et al. Prediction of neonatal metabolic acidosis in women with a singleton term pregnancy in cephalic presentation. Am J Perinatol: 2011; 29 167 174
7. Westerhuis ME, Visser GH, Moons KG., et al. Cardiotocography plus ST analysis of fetal electrocardiogram compared with cardiotocography only for intrapartum monitoring: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol: 2010; 115 1173 1180
8. Altman DG, Vergouwe Y, Royston P, Moons KG. Prognosis and prognostic research: validating a prognostic model. BMJ: 2009; 338 b605
9. Amer-Wåhlin I, Kjellmer I, Maršál K, Olofsson P, Rosén KG. Swedish randomized controlled trial of cardiotocography only versus cardiotocography plus ST analysis of fetal electrocardiogram revisited: analysis of data according to standard versus modified intention-to-treat principle. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand: 2011; 90 990 996
10. Amer-Wåhlin I, Hellsten C, Norén H., et al. Cardiotocography only versus cardiotocography plus ST analysis of fetal electrocardiogram for intrapartum fetal monitoring: a Swedish randomised controlled trial. Lancet: 2001; 358 534 538 (Pubitemid 32772728)
11. Siggaard-Andersen O. An acid-base chart for arterial blood with normal and pathophysiological reference areas. Scand J Clin Lab Invest: 1971; 27 239 245
12. Janssen KJ, Vergouwe Y, Kalkman CJ, Grobbee DE, Moons KG. A simple method to adjust clinical prediction models to local circumstances. Can J Anaesth: 2009; 56 194 201
13. Atkinson AC. A note on the generalized information criterion for choice of a model. Biometrika: 1980; 67 413 418
14. Harrell FE Jr, Lee KL, Mark DB. Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med: 1996; 15 361 387 (Pubitemid 26072233)
15. Miller ME, Hui SL, Tierney WM. Validation techniques for logistic regression models. Stat Med: 1991; 10 1213 1226
16. Vergouwe Y, Moons KG, Steyerberg EW. External validity of risk models: use of benchmark values to disentangle a case-mix effect from incorrect coefficients. Am J Epidemiol: 2010; 172 971 980
17. Donders AR, van der Heijden GJ, Stijnen T, Moons KG. Review: a gentle introduction to imputation of missing values. J Clin Epidemiol: 2006; 59 1087 1091 (Pubitemid 44374314)
18. Greenland S, Finkle WD. A critical look at methods for handling missing covariates in epidemiologic regression analyses. Am J Epidemiol: 1995; 142 1255 1264 (Pubitemid 26006424)
19. van der Heijden GJ, Donders AR, Stijnen T, Moons KG. Imputation of missing values is superior to complete case analysis and the missing-indicator method in multivariable diagnostic research: a clinical example. J Clin Epidemiol: 2006; 59 1102 1109 (Pubitemid 44374315)
20. Janssen KJ, Vergouwe Y, Donders AR., et al. Dealing with missing predictor values when applying clinical prediction models. Clin Chem: 2009; 55 994 1001
21. Stichting Perinatale Registratie Nederland. Perinatale Zorg in Nederland 2008. Utrecht, the Netherlands Stichting Perinatale Registratie Nederland: 2011
22. Wiberg N, Källén K, Olofsson P. Base deficit estimation in umbilical cord blood is influenced by gestational age, choice of fetal fluid compartment, and algorithm for calculation. Am J Obstet Gynecol: 2006; 195 1651 1656 (Pubitemid 44792636)
23. Reilly BM, Evans AT. Translating clinical research into clinical practice: impact of using prediction rules to make decisions. Ann Intern Med: 2006; 144 201 209 (Pubitemid 46780691)