How to choose needles and probes for ultrasonographically guided percutaneous breast biopsy: A systematic approach

Breast Cancer

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 238-241

  Uematsu, Takayoshi ^a  

^a SHIZUOKA CANCER CENTER   (Japan)

Author keywords

Breast; Core needle biopsy; Non mass like lesion; Ultrasonographically guided percutaneous breast biopsy; Vacuumassisted biopsy

Indexed keywords

BIOPSY TECHNIQUE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST LESION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ECHOGRAPHY; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; NEEDLE; NEEDLE BIOPSY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHICALLY GUIDED PERCUTANEOUS BREAST BIOPSY; VACUUM ASSISTED BIOPSY;

BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 84866400711     PISSN: 13406868     EISSN: 18804233     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12282-012-0340-7     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. O'Flynn EA, Wilson AR, Michell MJ. Image-guided breast biopsy: state-of-the-art. Clin Radiol. 2010;65:259-70.
2. Liberman L. Percutaneous image-guided core breast biopsy: state of the art at the millennium. Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:1191-9. (Pubitemid 30261759)
3. Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Heinig A, Hellerhoff K, Holzhausen HJ, Nahrig J. Use of ultrasound-guided percutaneous vacuumassisted breast biopsy for selected difficult indications. Breast J. 2009;15:348-56.
4. Uematsu T, Kasami M, Uchida Y, Yuen S, Sanuki J, Kimura K, et al. Ultrasonographically guided 18-gauge automated core needle breast biopsy wit post-fire needle position verification (PNPV). Breast Cancer. 2007;14:219-28.
5. Uematsu T, Kasami M. The use positive core was cytology to estimate potential risk of needle tract seeding of breast cancer: directional vacuum-assisted biopsy versus automated core needle biopsy. Breast Cancer. 2010;17:61-7.
6. Zagouri F, Gounaris A, Liakou P, Chersikos D, Flessas I, Bletsa G, et al. Vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: more cores, more hematomas? In Vivo. 2011;25:703-5.
7. Yazici B, Sever AR, Mills P, Fish D, Jones SE, Jones PA. Scar formation after stereotactic vacuum-assisted core biopsy of benign breast lesions. Clin Radiol. 2006;61:619-24. (Pubitemid 43899335)
8. Park HL, Kim LS. The current role of vacuum assisted breast biopsy system in breast disease. J Breast Cancer. 2011;14:1-7.
9. Parker SH, Burbank F, Jackman RJ, et al. Percutaneous largecore breast biopsy: a multi-institutional study. Radiology. 1994;193:359-64. (Pubitemid 24338314)
10. Kasami M, Uematsu T, Honda M, Yabuzaki T, Sanuki J, Uchida Y, et al. Comparison of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and Her-2 status in breast cancer pre- and post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast. 2008;17:523-7.
11. Tamaki K, Sasano H, Ishida T, Miyashita M, Takeda M, Amari M, et al. Comparison of core needle biopsy (CNB) and surgical specimens for accurate preoperative evaluation of ER, PgR and HER2 status of breast cancer patients. Cancer Sci. 2010;101:2074-9.
12. Uy GB, Laudico AV, Carnate JM Jr, Lim FG, Fernandez AM, Rivera RR, et al. Breast cancer hormone receptor assay results of core needle biopsy and modified radical mastectomy specimens from the same patients. Clin Breast Cancer. 2010;10:154-9.
13. Harvey JA, Moran RE, DeAngelis GA. Technique and pitfalls of ultrasound-guided core-needle biopsy of the breast. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2000;21:362-74.
14. Liberman L. Clinical management issues in percutaneous core breast biopsy. Radiol Clin North Am. 2000;38:791-807. (Pubitemid 30640066)
15. Parker SH. When is core biopsy really core? Radiology. 1992;185:641-2.
16. Maskarinec G, Nagata C, Shimizu H, Kashiki Y. Comparison of mammographic densities and their determinants in women from Japan and Hawaii. Int J Cancer. 2002;102:29-33.
17. Maskarinec G, Pagano I, Chen Z, Nagata C, Gram IT. Ethnic and geographic differences in mammographic density and their association with breast cancer incidence. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007;104:47-56. (Pubitemid 46976628)
18. Philpotts LE, Hooley RJ, Lee CH. Comparison of automated versus vacuum-assisted biopsy methods for sonographically guided core biopsy of the breast. Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180: 347-51. (Pubitemid 36135012)
19. Youk JH, Kim EK, Kim MJ, Oh KK. Sonographically guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy of breast masses: a review of 2,420 cases with long-term follow-up. Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190: 202-7.
20. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). 4th ed. Reston: American College of Radiology; 2003.
21. Hsu HH, Yu JC, Hsu GC, Chang WC, Yu CP, Tung HJ, et al. Ultrasonographic alterations associated with the dilatation of mammary ducts: feature analysis and BI-RADS assessment. Eur Radiol. 2010;20:293-302.
22. Takei J, Tsunoda-Shimizu H, Kikuchi M, Kawasaki T, Yagata H, Tsugawa K, et al. Clinical implications of architectural distortion visualized by breast ultrasonography. Breast Cancer. 2009;16: 132-5.
23. Berg WA, Sechtin AG, Marques H, Zhang Z. Cystic breast masses and the ACRIN 6666 experience. Radiol Clin North Am. 2010;48:931-87.
24. Shin HJ, Kim HH, Kim SM, Yang HR, Sohn JH, Kwon GY, et al. Papillary lesions of the breast diagnosed at percutaneous sonographically guided biopsy: comparison of sonographic features and biopsy methods. Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:630-6. (Pubitemid 351304505)
25. Parker SH, Klaus AJ, McWey PJ, Schilling KJ, Cupples TE, Duchesne N, et al. Sonographically guided directional vacuumassisted breast biopsy using a handheld device. Am J Roentgenol. 2001;177:405-8. (Pubitemid 32660502)
26. Kim MJ, Kim EK, Lee JY, Youk JH, Park BW, Kim SI, et al. Breast lesions with imaging-histologic discordance during USguided 14G automated core biopsy: can the directional vacuumassisted removal replace the surgical excision? Initial findings. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:2376-83. (Pubitemid 47288276)