Validity of A Short-Term Quality of Life Questionnaire in Patients Undergoing Joint Replacement: The Quality of Recovery-40

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 27, Issue 9, 2012, Pages

  Poitras, Stephane ^a   Beaule, Paul E ^b   Dervin, Geoffrey F ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Hip or knee arthroplasty; Post surgery; Psychometric properties; Quality of life; Quality of Recovery 40; Questionnaire

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INDEPENDENCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OSTEOARTHRITIS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUALITY OF RECOVERY 40 QUESTIONNAIRE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; SHORT FORM 12; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; VALIDITY;

EID: 84866391861     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.03.015     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Kim S. Changes in surgical loads and economic burden of hip and knee replacements in the US: 1997-2004. Arthritis Rheum 2008, 59:4.
2. Ethgen O. Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. A qualitative and systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004, 86-A:5.
3. Fitzgerald J.D. Patient quality of life during the 12 months following joint replacement surgery. Arthritis Rheum 2004, 51:1.
4. Van Herck P. Key interventions and outcomes in joint arthroplasty clinical pathways: a systematic review. J Eval Clin Pract 2010, 16:1.
5. Kluivers K.B. Systematic review on recovery specific quality-of-life instruments. Surgery 2008, 143:2.
6. Riddle D.L. Findings of extensive variation in the types of outcome measures used in hip and knee replacement clinical trials: a systematic review. Arthritis Rheum 2008, 59:6.
7. Myles P.S. Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40. Br J Anaesth 2000, 84:1.
8. Shoukri M. Sample size requirements for the design of reliability study: review and new results. Stat Methods Med Res 2004, 13:4.
9. Terwee C.B. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007, 60:1.
10. Bachmeier C.J. A comparison of outcomes in osteoarthritis patients undergoing total hip and knee replacement surgery. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2001, 9:2.
11. Petrie K. The psychological impact of hip arthroplasty. Aust N Z J Surg 1994, 64:2.
12. Gardner FV: Psychological effects of cardiac surgery: a review of the literature. 117:4, 1997.
13. Mancuso C.A. Patients with poor preoperative functional status have high expectations of total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2003, 18:7.
14. Bost J.E. The 8-item Short-Form Health Survey and the physical comfort composite score of the quality of recovery 40-item scale provide the most responsive assessments of pain, physical function, and mental function during the first 4 days after ambulatory knee surgery with regional anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2007, 105:6.
15. Wang T. Functional recovery and timing of hospital discharge after primary total hip arthroplasty. Aust N Z J Surg 1998, 68:8.
16. Pisoni C. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) core sets for osteoarthritis. A useful tool in the follow-up of patients after joint arthroplasty. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2008, 44:4.
17. Singh J. Challenges with health-related quality of life assessment in arthroplasty patients: problems and solutions. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2010, 18:2.
18. Stratford P.W. Performance measures were necessary to obtain a complete picture of osteoarthritic patients. J Clin Epidemiol 2006, 59:2.
19. Stratford P.W. New study design evaluated the validity of measures to assess change after hip or knee arthroplasty. J Clin Epidemiol 2009, 62:3.