Glove selection for work with UV/EB-curing acrylates

Protective Gloves for Occupational Use, Second Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 287-298

  Zwanenburg, Rob ^a   Jolanki, Riitta ^b   Mäkelä, Erja A ^b   Estlander, Tuula ^b  

^a RadTech Europe   (Netherlands)

^b FINNISH INSTITUTE OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84866387406     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (60)

1. Knight, R., UV curing equipments and applications, in Markets and Curing Equipment, Dufour, P., Pincus, A., Tanihata, A., Skelhorne, G., and Knight, R., Eds., Vol. 1, SITA Technology, London, 1991, 159-269.
2. Cavelier, C., Jelen, G., Hervé-Bazin, B., and Foussereau, J., Irritation et allergie aux acrylates et méthacrylates, Ann. Dermatol. Venereol. (Paris), 108, 59-66, 1981.
3. Lovell, C.R., Rycroft, R.C.G., and Williams, D.M.J., Contact dermatitis from the irritancy (immediate and delayed) and allergenicity of hydroxypropyl acrylate, Contact Dermatitis, 12, 117-118, 1985.
4. Malten, K.E., den Arend, J.A.C.J., and Wiggers, R.E., Delayed irritation: hexanediol diacrylate and butanediol diacrylate, Contact Dermatitis, 5, 178-184, 1979.
5. Nethercott, J.R., Dermatitis in the printing industry, Dermatol. Clin., 6, 61-66, 1988.
6. van der Walle, H.B., Sensitizing Potential of Acrylic Monomers in Guinea Pigs, thesis, Nijmegen, 1982.
7. Björkner, B., Sensitizing Capacity of Ultraviolet Curable Acrylic Compounds, thesis, Lund, 1984.
8. Nylander-French, L.A., Identification of Risk to Workers in the Ultraviolet Radiation Curing Wood Surface Coating Industry, doctoral thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, 1994.
9. Surakka, J., Dermal Exposure to UV-Radiation and UV-Curable Acrylate Coatings in the Wood Working Industry, doctoral thesis, Luleå Universitiy of Technology, Luleå, Sweden, 2000.
10. Oldring, P.K.T., Ed., Chemistry and Technology of UV & EB Formulation for Coatings, Inks and Paints, SITA Technology, London, 1991.
11. Webster, G., Ed., Chemistry and Technology of UV and EB Formulation for Coatings, Inks and Paints: Prepolymers and Reactive Diluents for UV and EB Curable Formulations, Wiley-SITA, London, 1997.
12. Brack, K. and Braddock, J., Eds., Radiation-Curable Coatings, Adhesives, and Inks:Technology and Practical Applications, Technomic Publishing, Lancaster, PA, 1999.
13. Neckers, D.C., Chemistry and Technology of UV and EB Formulation for Coatings, Inks and Paints: UV and EB at the Millennium, Wiley-SITA, London, 1999.
14. RadTech Europe: http://www.radtech-europe.com/.
15. RadTech North America: http://www.radtech.org/.
16. Magnusson, B. and Mobacken, H., Allergic contact dermatitis from acrylate printing plates in a printing plant, Berufsdermatosen, 20, 138, 1972.
17. Emmett, E.A., Contact dermatitis from polyfunctional acrylic monomers, Contact Dermatitis, 3, 245-248, 1977.
18. Emmett, E.A., Allergic contact dermatitis from ultraviolet cured inks, J. Occup. Med., 19, 113-115, 1977.
19. Malten, K.E., Contact sensitization to Letterflex urethane photopolymer mixture used in printing, Contact Dermatitis, 3, 115-121, 1977.
20. Malten, K.E. and Seutter, E., Contact dermatitis from acrylated resins in UV Ebecryl printing ink, Contact Dermatitis, 11, 56-58, 1984.
21. Nethercott, J.R., Skin problems associated with multifunctional acrylic monomers in ultraviolet curing inks, Br. J. Dermatol., 98, 541-552, 1978.
22. Nethercott, J.R., Allergic contact dermatitis due to an epoxy acrylate, Br. J. Dermatol., 104, 697-703, 1981.
23. Nethercott, J.R., Jakubovic, H.R., Pilger, C., and Smith, J.W., Allergic contact dermatitis due to urethane acrylate in ultraviolet cured inks, Br. J. Ind. Med., 40, 241-250, 1983.
24. Nethercott, J.R., Gupta, S., Rosen, C.I., Enders, L.J., and Piger, C.W., Tetraethylene glycol diacrylate. A cause of delayed cutaneous irritant reaction and allergic contact dermatitis, J. Occup. Med., 26, 513-516, 1984.
25. Nethercott, J.R. and Nosal, R., Contact dermatitis in printing tradesmen, Contact Dermatitis, 14, 280-287, 1986.
26. Nethercott, J.R., Dermatitis in the printing industry, Dermatol. Clin., 6, 61-66, 1988.
27. Widström, L., Contact allergy to acrylate monomer in a printing plate, Contact Dermatitis, 8, 68-80, 1982.
28. Pedersen, N.B., Senning, A., and Nielsen, A.O., Different sensitising acrylic monomers in Napp® printing plate, Contact Dermatitis, 9, 459-464, 1983.
29. Wahlberg, J.E., Contact sensitivity to Napp® printing plates secondary to a relapsing hand dermatitis, Contact Dermatitis, 9, 239, 1983.
30. van der Walle, H.B., Klecak, G., Geleick, H., and Bensink, T., Sensitizing potential of 14 mono(meth)acrylates in the guinea pig, Contact Dermatitis, 8, 223-235, 1982.
31. van der Walle, H.B., Waegemaekers, Th., and Bensink, T., Sensitizing potential of 12di(meth)acrylates in the guinea pig, Contact Dermatitis, 9, 10-20, 1983.
32. Björkner, B., Allergenicity of trimethylol propane triacrylate in ultraviolet curing inks in the guinea pig, Acta Derm. Venereol., 60, 528-531, 1980.
33. Björkner, B., Dahlquist, I., and Fregert S., Allergic contact dermatitis from acrylates in ultraviolet curing inks, Contact Dermatitis, 6, 405-409, 1980.
34. Björkner, B. and Niklasson, B., Influence of the vehicle on elicitation of contact allergic reactions to acrylic compounds in the guinea pig, Contact Dermatitis, 11, 268-278, 1984.
35. Parker, D. and Turk, J.L., Contact sensitivity to acrylate compounds in guinea pigs, Contact Dermatitis, 9, 55-60, 1983.
36. Parker, D., Long, P.V., Bull, J.E., and Turk, J.L., Epicutaneous induction of tolerance with acrylates and related compounds, Contact Dermatitis, 12, 146-154, 1985.
37. Basketter, D.A. and Scholes, E.W., Comparison of the local lymph node assay with the guinea-pig maximization test for the detection of a range of contact allergens, Food Chem. Toxicol., 30, 65-69, 1992.
38. Arimura, M., Yokozeki, H., Katayama, I., Nakmura, T., Masuda, M., and Nishioka, K., Experimental study for the development on an in vitro test for contact allergens, Arch. Allergy Immunol., 115, 228-234, 1998
39. Hayes, B.B. and Meade, B.J., Contact sensitivity to selected acrylate compounds in B6C3F1 mice: relative potency, cross reactivity and comparison of test methods, Drug Chem. Toxicol., 22, 491-506, 1999.
40. Andrews, L.S. and Clary, J.J., Review of the toxicity of multifunctional acrylates, J. Toxicol. Environ. Health, 19, 149-164, 1986.
41. Sinka, J.V., Higbie, F.A., and Lieberman, R.A., Radiation-Hardenable Diluents, Eur. Pat. Appl. 0 062 807 B1, 1984.
42. Bergvall, G., Acrylate Monomer Having a Reduced Primary Irritation Index and a Method of Making Same, U.S. Patent 5,543,557, 1996.
43. Taylor, J.S., Acrylic reactions-ten-years experience, in Current Topics in Contact Dermatitis, J.P. Frosch et al., Eds., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1989, 346-351.
44. Kanerva, L., Estlander, T., Jolanki, R., and Tarvainen, K., Statistics on allergic patch test reactions caused by acrylate compounds, including data on ethyl methacrylate, Am. J. Contact Dermatitis, 6, 75-77, 1995.
45. Kanerva, L., Jolanki, R., and Estlander, T., 10 years of patch testing with the (meth)acrylate series, Contact Dermatitis, 37, 255-258, 1997.
46. Tucker, S.C. and Beck, M.H., A 15-year study of patch testing to (meth)acrylates, Contact Dermatitis, 40, 278-279, 1999.
47. Livesley, E., Rushton, L., English, J., and Williams, H., The prevalence of occupational dermatitis in the UK printing industry, poster at 5th ESCD, Amsterdam, 2000.
48. Geukens, S. and Goossens, A., Occupational contact allergy to (meth)acrylates, Contact Dermatitis, 44, 153-159, 2001.
49. Rietschel, R., Huggins, R., Levy, N., and Pruitt, P.A., In vivo and in vitro testing of gloves for protection against UV-curable acrylate resin systems, Contact Dermatitis, 11, 279-282, 1984.
50. Huggins, R., Levy, N., and Pruitt, P.M., Testing of gloves for permeability to UVcurable acrylate coatings, Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J., 48, 656-659, 1987.
51. Renard, E.P., Goydan, R., and Stolki, T., Permeation of multifunctional acrylates through selected protective glove materials, Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J., 53, 117-123, 1992.
52. Munksgaard, E.C., Permeability of protective gloves to (di)methacrylates in resinous dental materials, Scand. J. Dent. Res., 100, 189-192, 1992.
53. Mäkelä, E., Väänänen, V., Alanko, K., Jolanki, R., Estlander, T., and Kanerva, L., Resistance of disposable gloves to permeation by 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate and triethyleneglycol dimethacrylate, Occup. Hyg., 5, 121-129, 1999.
54. Mäkelä, E., Jolanki, R., Väänänen, V., Estlander, T., and Alanko, K., Kertakäyttökäsineiden metakrylaattiläpäisevyys [Methacrylate permeation through disposable gloves], Suomen Hammaslääkärilehti [Finnish Dental Journal] 10, 356-363, 2003 (in Finnish with English summary).
55. Zwanenburg, R.C.W., Adequate Protective Gloves for Working with UV/EB-Curing Acrylates, in Proceedings of RadTech Berlin, 2000.
56. Also published at the sites of RadTech Europe: http://www.radtech-europe.com/
57. RadTech North America:http://www.radtech.org/
58. CEPE: http://www.cepe.org.
59. Forsberg, K. and Mansdorf, S.Z., Quick Selection Guide to Chemical Protective Clothing, 2nd ed., Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1993.
60. 4H Chemical Protection Guide. Safety 4 A/S. 1998:1.