Development of an instrument to measure face validity, feasibility and utility of patient questionnaire use during health care: The QQ-10

International Journal for Quality in Health Care

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 517-524

  Moores, K L ^a   Jones, G L ^b   Radley, S C ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF NORTH STAFFORDSHIRE   (United Kingdom)

^b Regent Court   (United Kingdom)

^c Obstetrics and Gynaecology   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Factor analysis; Patient satisfaction; Psychometrics; Quality of life; Questionnaire; Statistical

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; EPAQ PF QUESTIONNAIRE; EXPERIENCE; FACE VALIDITY; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE; HOSPITAL DEPARTMENT; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; QQ 10 QUESTIONNAIRE; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84866369568     PISSN: 13534505     EISSN: 14643677     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzs051     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Steine S, Finset A, Laerum E. A new, brief questionnaire (PEQ) developed in primary health care for measuring patients' experience of interaction, emotion and consultation outcome. Fam Pract 2001;18:410-8.
2. Timmins N. Assessing patient care. NHS goes to the PROMS. BMJ 2008;336:1464-5.
3. Velikova G, Booth L, Smith AB et al. Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:714-24.
4. Detmar SB, Muller MJ, Schornagel JH et al. Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient-physician communication: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2002;288: 3027-34.
5. Coates A, Porzsolt F, Osoba D. Quality of life in oncology practice: prognostic value of EORTC QLQ-C30 scores in patients with advanced malignancy. Eur J Cancer 1997;33: 1025-30.
6. Dancey J, Zee B, Osoba D. Quality of life scores: an independent prognostic variable in a general population of cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Qual Life Res 1997;6:151-8.
7. Cella D, Fairclough DL, Bonomi PB. Quality of life in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): results from Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) study E5592. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 1997;16:2a (abstract 4).
8. Radley SC, Jones GL, Tanguy EA et al. Computer interviewing in urogynaecology: concept, development and psychometric testing of an electronic pelvic floor assessment questionnaire in primary and secondary care. BJOG 2006;113:231-8.
9. Nunnally JC. Psychometric Theory. New Delhi: Tate McGraw Hill, 1978.
10. Gilbody SM, House AO, Sheldon T. Routine administration of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and needs assessment instruments to improve psychological outcome-a systematic review. Psychol Med 2002;32:1345-56.
11. Sonke Gabe S, Verbeek André LM, Kiemeney Lambertus ALM. A philosophical perspective supports the need for patient-outcome studies in diagnostic test evaluation. J Clin Epidemiol 2008;62:58-61.
12. Rothwell PM, McDowell Z, Wong CK et al. Quality of life in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1998;65:433.
13. Ibbotson T, Maguire P, Selby P. Screening for anxiety and depression in cancer patients: the effects of disease and treatment. Eur J Cancer 1994;30A:37-40.
14. Kline P. A Handbook of Test Construction. London: Methuen & Co, 1986.
15. Streiner DL, Norman G. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to their Development and Use, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
16. Hawkes N. Measuring up the NHS. BMJ 2009;338:504-5.
17. Valderas JM, Alonso J, Guyatt GH. Measuring patient-reported outcomes: moving from clinical trials into clinical practice. MJA 2008;189:93-94.
18. Valderas JM, Kotzeva A, Espallargues M et al. The impact of measuring patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: a systematic review of the literature. Qual Life Res 2008;17: 179-93.
19. Lohr KN, Zebrack BJ. Using patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: challenges and opportunities. Qual Life Res 2009;18:99-107.
20. McHorney CA. Health status assessment methods for adults: past accomplishments and future challenges. Ann Rev Public Health 1999;20:309-35.
21. Greenhalgh J, Meadows K. The effectiveness of the use of patient-based measures of health in routine practice in improving the process and outcomes of patient care: a literature review. J Eval Clin Pract 1999;5:401-16.
22. Espallargues M, Valderas JM, Alonso J. Provision of feedback on perceived health status to health care professionals: a systematic review of its impact. Med Care 2000;38:175-86.
23. Guyatt GH, Ferrans CE, Halyard MY et al. Clinical Significance Consensus Meeting Group. Exploration of the value of health-related quality-of-life information from clinical research and into clinical practice. Mayo Clin Proc 2007;82:1229-39.
24. Freeman JA, Hobart JC, Langdon DW et al. Clinical appropriateness: a key factor in outcome measure selection: the 36 item short form health survey in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000;68:150-6.
25. Morris J, Perez D, McNoe B. The use of quality of life data in clinical practice. Qual Life Res 1997;7:85-91.