Prospective multicenter evaluation of colon capsule examination indicated by colonoscopy failure or anesthesia contraindication

Endoscopy

Volumn 44, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 911-916

  Pioche, M ^a   De Leusse, A ^a   Filoche, B ^b   Dalbies P A ^c   Adenis Lamarre, P ^d   Jacob, P ^e   Gaudin, J L ^f   Coulom, P ^g   Letard, J C ^a   Borotto, E ^h   Duriez, A ⁱ   Chabaud, J M ^c   Crampon, D ^a   Gincul, R ^a   Levy, P ^a   Ben Soussan, E ^j   Garret, M ^k   Lapuelle, J ^f   Saurin, J C ^a  

^a Pavillon H Hôpital Edouard Herriot ^*  (France)

^b Centre Hospitalier Saint Philibert GHICL   (France)

^c Gastroenterology Practice   (France)

^d Department of Gastroenterology   (France)

^e Gastroenterology Practice   (France)

^f Clinique Val dOuest   (France)

^g Clinique Saint Jean Languedoc   (France)

^h CAEN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

ⁱ CENTRE HOSPITALIER DE ROUBAIX   (France)

^j ROUEN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^k Department of Gastroenterology   (France)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MOVIPREP; SODIUM DIHYDROGEN PHOSPHATE;

ADULT; AGED; ANESTHESIA; ARTICLE; CAPSULE ENDOSCOPE; CAPSULE ENDOSCOPY; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL ADENOMA; COLORECTAL POLYP; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIVERTICULOSIS; EVALUATION; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FRANCE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SIGMOIDOSCOPY; SYMPTOM; TELANGIECTASIA;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANESTHESIA; CAPSULE ENDOSCOPY; COLONOSCOPY; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; FRANCE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT FAILURE;

EID: 84866369171     PISSN: 0013726X     EISSN: 14388812     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1310008     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Canard JM, Debette-Gratien M, Dumas R et al. A prospective national study on colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy in 2000 in France. Gastroenterol Clin Biol: 2005; 29 17 22
2. Halligan S, Altman DG, Taylor SA et al. CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: systematic review, meta-analysis, and proposed minimum data set for study level reporting. Radiology: 2005; 237 893 904
3. Gay G, Delvaux M. Small-bowel endoscopy. Endoscopy: 2008; 40 140 146
4. Eliakim R. Video capsule endoscopy of the small bowel. Curr Opin Gastroenterol: 2008; 24 159 163
5. Triester SL, Leighton JA, Leontiadis GI et al. A meta-analysis of the yield of capsule endoscopy compared to other diagnostic modalities in patients with non-stricturing small bowel Crohn's disease. Am J Gastroenterol: 2006; 101 954 964
6. Leighton JA, Triester SL, Sharma VK. Capsule endoscopy: a meta-analysis for use with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding and Crohns disease. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am: 2006; 16 229 250
7. Pioche M, Gaudin JL, Filoche B et al. Prospective, randomized comparison of two small-bowel capsule endoscopy systems in patients with obscure GI bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc: 2011; 73 1181 1188
8. Eliakim R, Fireman Z, Gralnek IM et al. Evaluation of the PillCam Colon capsule in the detection of colonic pathology: results of the first multicenter, prospective, comparative study. Endoscopy: 2006; 38 963 970
9. Schoofs N, Deviere J, Van Gossum A. PillCam colon capsule endoscopy compared with colonoscopy for colorectal tumor diagnosis: a prospective pilot study. Endoscopy: 2006; 38 971 977
10. Van Gossum A, Munoz-Navas M, Fernandez-Urien I et al. Capsule endoscopy versus colonoscopy for the detection of polyps and cancer. N Engl J Med: 2009; 361 264 270
11. Spada C, Hassan C, Munoz-Navas M et al. Second-generation colon capsule endoscopy compared with colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc: 2011; 74 581 9
12. Eliakim R, Yassin K, Niv Y et al. Prospective multicenter performance evaluation of the second-generation colon capsule compared with colonoscopy. Endoscopy: 2009; 41 1026 1031
13. Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS) Endoscopie digestive basse: indications. Recommandations. 2004; Available at: http://www.has-sante.fr/ portail/upload/docs/application/pdf/endoscopie-2004-recommandations-mise-en- forme-2006.pdf
14. Aronchick CA. Bowel preparation scale. Gastrointest Endosc: 2004; 60 1037 1038; author reply 1038-1039
15. Metcalf JV, Smith J, Jones R, Record CO. Incidence and causes of rectal bleeding in general practice as detected by colonoscopy. Br J Gen Pract: 1996; 46 161 164
16. Exbrayat C, Garnier A, Billette De Villemeur A et al. [Yield of colonoscopy by indication and consequences for colorectal polyp and cancer screening: a prospective survey in Isere, France]. Gastroenterol Clin Biol: 2002; 26 225 230
17. Yucel C, Lev-Toaff AS, Moussa N, Durrani H. CT colonography for incomplete or contraindicated optical colonoscopy in older patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol: 2008; 190 145 150
18. Sali L, Falchini M, Bonanomi AG et al. CT colonography after incomplete colonoscopy in subjects with positive faecal occult blood test. World J Gastroenterol: 2008; 14 4499 4504
19. Pasha SF, Harrison ME, Das A et al. Utility of double-balloon colonoscopy for completion of colon examination after incomplete colonoscopy with conventional colonoscope. Gastrointest Endosc: 2007; 65 848 853
20. Gay G, Delvaux M. Double-balloon colonoscopy after failed conventional colonoscopy: a pilot series with a new instrument. Endoscopy: 2007; 39 788 792
21. Moreels TG, Macken EJ, Roth B et al. Cecal intubation rate with the double-balloon endoscope after incomplete conventional colonoscopy: a study in 45 patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol: 2010; 25 80 83
22. Spada C, Hassan C, Ingrosso M et al. A new regimen of bowel preparation for PillCam colon capsule endoscopy: a pilot study. Dig Liver Dis: 2011; 43 300 304
23. Spada C, Riccioni ME, Hassan C et al. PillCam colon capsule endoscopy: a prospective, randomized trial comparing two regimens of preparation. J Clin Gastroenterol: 2011; 45 119 124