Space requirements to optimize welfare and performance in group housed pigs-A review

American Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 48-54

  Whittaker, Alexandra L ^a   van Wettere, William H ^a   Hughes, Paul E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Commercial farming; Confounding variable; Group housed systems; Minimum space allocation; Remains problematic; Resulting injury

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA; SUIDAE; SUS SCROFA DOMESTICA;

EID: 84866368580     PISSN: 15574555     EISSN: 15574563     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3844/ajavsp.2012.48.54     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Andersen, I.L., K.E. Boe and K. Hove, 2000. Behavioural and physiological thermoregulation in groups of pregnant sows housed in a kennel system at low temperatures. Can. J. Anim. Sci., 80: 1-8.
2. Barnett, J.L., P.H. Hemsworth, G.M. Cronin, E.A. Newman and T.H. McCallum et al., 1992. Effects of pen size, partial stalls and method of feeding on welfare-related behavioral and physiological responses of group-housed pigs. Applied Anim. Behav. Sci., 34: 207-220.
3. Beattie, V.E., N. Walker and I.A. Sneddon, 1996. An investigation of the effect of environmental enrichment and space allowance on the behavior and production of growing pigs. Applied Anim. Behav. Sci., 48: 151-158.
4. Beattie, V.E., N. Walker and I.A. Sneddon, 1995. Effects of environmental enrichment on behavior and productivity of growing pigs. Anim. Welfare, 4: 207-220.
5. Bogner, H., 1982. Ethological demands in the keeping of pigs. Applied Anim. Ethol., 8: 301-305.
6. Bronson, F.H. and B.E. Eleftheriou, 1963. Adrenal responses to crowding in Peromyscus and C57BL/10J mice. Physiol. Zool., 36: 161-166.
7. Brumm, M.C. and P.S. Miller, 1996. Response of pigs to space allocation and diets varying in nutrient density. J. Anim. Sci. 74: 2730-2737. PMID: 8923187
8. Brumm, M.C., 1996. Effect of space allowance on barrow performance to 136 kilograms body weight. NCR-89 Committee on Management of Swine. J. Anim. Sci., 74: 745-749. PMID: 8727994
9. Cale, W.H., 1979. Housing of breeding stock. Australian Pig Industry Research Committee.
10. Christian, J.J., 1955. Effect of population size on the adrenal glands and reproductive organs of male mice in populations of fixed size. Am. J. Physiol., 182: 292-300. PMID: 13258805
11. Cronin, G.M., P.H. Hemsworth, C.G. Winfield, B. Muller and W.A. Chamley, 1983. The incidence of and factors associated with, failure to mate by 245 days of age in the gilt. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 5: 199-205.
12. Ewbank, R. and M.J. Bryant, 1972. Aggressive behavior amongst groups of domesticated pigs kept at various stocking rates. Anim. Behav., 20: 21-28. DOI: 10.1016/S0003-3472(72)80169-6
13. Ford, J.J. and H.S. Teague, 1978. Effect of floor space restriction on age at puberty in gilts and on performance of barrows and gilts. J. Anim. Sci., 47: 828-832.
14. Fraser, A.F. and D.M. Broom, 1990. Farm Animal Behavior and Welfare. 3rd Edn., CAB International, Wallingford, ISBN-10: 0851991602 pp: 437.
15. Gehlbach, G.D., D.E. Becker, J.L. Cox, B.G. Harmon and A.H. Jensen, 1966. Effects of Floor Space Allowance and Number per Group on Performance of Growing-Finishing Swine. J. Anim. Sci., 25: 386-391.
16. Gonyou, H.W. and W.R. Stricklin, 1998. Effects of floor area allowance and group size on the productivity of growing/finishing pigs. J. Anim. Sci., 76: 1326-1330.
17. Heitman, H., L. Hahn, C.F. Kelly and T.E. Bond, 1961. Space allotment and performance of growingfinishing swine raised in confinement. J. Anim. Sci., 20: 543-546.
18. Hemsworth, P.H., J.L. Barnett, C. Hansen and C.G. Winfield, 1986. Effects of social environment on welfare status and sexual behavior of female pigs. II. Effects of space allowance. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 16: 259-267.
19. Humik, J.F. and N.J. Lewis, 1991. Use of body surface area to set minimum space allowances for confined pigs and cattle. Can. J. Anim. Sci., 71: 577-580.
20. Hyun, Y., M. Ellis and R.W. Johnson, 1998. Effects of feeder type, space allowance and mixing on the growth performance and feed intake pattern of growing pigs. J. Anim. Sci., 76: 2771-2778. PMID: 9856385
21. Jensen, A. H., D.E. Becker and B.G. Harmon, 1966. Management factors and young pig performance. J. Anim. Sci., 25: 1273.
22. Jensen, A.H. and S.E. Curtis, 1976. Effects of group size and of negative air ionization on performance of growing-finishing swine. J. Anim. Sci., 42: 8-11.
23. Jensen, A.H., 1971. Biological implications of intensive swine rearing systems. J. Anim. Sci., 31: 560-565.
24. Kattesh, H.G., E.T. Kornegay, J.W. Knight, F.G. Gwazdauskas and H.R. H.R. Thomas et al., 1980. Glucocorticoid concentrations, corticosteroid binding protein characteristics and reproductive performance of sows and gilts subjected to applied stress during mid-gestation. J. Anim. Sci., 50: 897-905. PMID: 7390944
25. Kuhlers, D.L., S.B. Jungst, D.N. Marple and C.H. Rahe, 1985. The effect of pen density during rearing on subsequent reproductive performance in gilts. J. Anim. Sci., 61: 1066-1069. PMID: 4077751
26. Meunier-Salaun, M.C., M.N. Vantrimponte, A. Raab and R. Dantzer, 1987. Effect of floor area restriction upon performance, behavior and physiology of growing-finishing pigs. J. Anim. Sci., 64: 1371-1377. PMID: 3583943
27. Moser, R.L., S.G. Cornelius, J.E. Pettigrew, H.E. Hanke and C.D. Hagen, 1985. Response of growing-finishing pigs to decreasing floor space allowance and (or) virginiamycin in diet. J. Anim. Sci., 61: 337-342. PMID: 3930458
28. Pickett, R.A., W.H. Fugate, R.B. Harrington, T.W. Perry and T.M. Curtin, 1969. Influence of feed preparation and number of pigs per pen on performance and occurrence of esophagogastric ulcers in swine. J. Anim. Sci., 28: 837-841. PMID: 5390353
29. Randolph, J.H., G.L. Cromwell, T.S. Stahly and D.D. Kratzer, 1981. Effects of group size and space allowance on performance and behavior of swine. J. Anim. Sci., 53: 922-927.
30. Remience, V., 2008. Effects of space allowance on the welfare of dry sows kept in dynamic groups and fed with an electronic sow feeder. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 112: 284-296.
31. Ross, M.C. and S.E. Curtis, 1976. Space allowance and pig behavior. J. Anim. Sci., Salak-Johnson, J. L., S.R.
32. Niekamp, S.L. Rodriguez-Zas, M. Ellis and S.E. Curtis, 2007. Space allowance for dry, pregnant sows in pens: body condition, skin lesions and performance. J. Anim. Sci., 85: 1758-1769. PMID: 17371790
33. ECVSC, 1997. The Welfare of Intensively Kept Pigs. 1st Edn., European Commission, Brussels, pp: 191.
34. Spicer, H.M. and F.X. Aherne, 1987. The effects of group size/stocking density on weanling pig performance and behavior. Applied Anim. Behav. Sci., 19: 89-98. DOI: 10.1016/0168-1591 (87)90206-1
35. Street, B.R. and H.W. Gonyou, 2008. Effects of housing finishing pigs in two group sizes and at two floor space allocations on production, health, behavior and physiological variables. J. Anim. Sci., 86: 982-991. PMID: 17965323
36. Weng, R.C., S.A. Edwards and P.R. English, 1998. Behavior, social interactions and lesion scores of group-housed sows in relation to floor space allowance. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 59: 307-316.
37. Wolter, B.F., M. Ellis, S.E. Curtis, E.N. Parr and D.M. Webel, 2000. Group size and floor-space allowance can affect weanling-pig performance. J. Anim. Sci., 78: 2062-2067. PMID: 10947088
38. Young, M.G., M.D. Tokach, F.X. Aherne, S.S. Dritz and R.D. Goodband et al., 2008. Effect of space allowance during rearing and selection criteria of performance of gilts over three parities in a commercial swine production system. J. Anim. Sci., 86: 3181-3193. PMID: 18567731