The use of speech disfluency as an indicant of paradigm development in pharmacy's academic subdisciplines

Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy

Volumn 8, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 443-454

  Holmes, Erin R ^a   Desselle, Shane P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Paradigm development; Pharmacy subdisciplines; Scholarly consensus; Scientific paradigm; Speech disfluency

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EDUCATION; FEAR; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PERFORMANCE ANXIETY; SELF CONCEPT; SPEECH; UNIVERSITY;

EDUCATION, PHARMACY; FACULTY; FEAR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PERFORMANCE ANXIETY; SELF CONCEPT; SPEECH;

EID: 84866356906     PISSN: 15517411     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2011.11.005     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Braxton J.M., Hargens L.L. Variation among academic disciplines: analytical frameworks and research. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research 1996, 1-46. Agathon, New York, NY. J.C. Smart (Ed.).
2. Kuhn T.S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 1970, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
3. Lodahl J.B., Gordon G. The structure of scientific fields and the functioning of university graduate departments. Am Sociol Rev 1972, 37:57-72.
4. Biglan A. The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. J Appl Psychol 1973, 57:195-203.
5. Biglan A. Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments. J Appl Psychol 1973, 57:204-213.
6. Desselle S.P., Collins C.C., Harrold M.W., Kalis M.M., Quattrocchi E.J. Consensus within five academic subdisciplines of pharmacy: progress toward establishing their scientific paradigms. J Pharm Teach 2002, 9(2):27-46.
7. Desselle S.P., Collins C.C., Harrold M.W., Kalis M.M., Quattrocchi E.J. Quantitative and qualitative assessments of consensus within pharmacy's academic subdisciplines. J Pharm Teach 2002, 9(4):1-33.
8. Bazerman C. Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science 1988, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI.
9. Zuckerman H., Merton R.K. Patterns of evaluation in science: institutionalization, structure and functions of the referee system. Minerva 1971, 9:66-100.
10. Hargens L.L. Scholarly consensus and journal rejection rates. Am Sociol Rev 1988, 53:139-151.
11. Pfeffer J., Leong A., Strehl K. Paradigm development and particularism: journal publication in three scientific disciplines. Soc Forces 1977, 55:938-951.
12. Lodahl J.B., Gordon G. Funding the sciences in university departments. Educ Rec 1973, 54:74-82.
13. Hargens L.L., Kelly-Wilson L. Determinants of disciplinary discontent. Soc Forces 1994, 72:1177-1195.
14. Braxton J.M., Berger J.B. How disciplinary consensus affects faculty. Faculty in New Jobs 1999, 243-267. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA. Menges RJ and Associates (Ed.).
15. Schwartz M.A. Strategic plan for pharmacy's future. Am J Pharm Educ 1989, 53:152-156.
16. Robertson K.E., McDaniel A.M. Interdisciplinary education: collaborative clinical teaching project. Am J Pharm Educ 1995, 59:131-136.
17. Commission to Implement Change in Pharmaceutical Education Background paper II. Entry-level, curricular outcomes, curricular content and education process. Am J Pharm Educ 1993, 57:377-385.
18. Zito S.W. Wouldn't it be nice?. Am J Pharm Educ 1998, 62:473-474.
19. Schachter S., Christenfeld N., Rvina B., Bilous R. Speech disfluency and the structure of knowledge. J Pers Soc Psychol 1991, 60:362-367.
20. Rochester S.R. The significance of pauses in spontaneous speech. J Psycholinguist Res 1973, 2:51-81.
21. Lounsbury F.G. Transitional probability, linguistic structure, and systems of habit-family hierarchies. Psycholinguistics: A Survey of Theory and Research Problems 1954, 93-101. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD. C.E. Osgood, T.A. Sebeok (Eds.).
22. Goldman-Eisler F. Psycholinguistics: Experiments in Spontaneous Speech 1968, Academic Press, London, UK.
23. Christenfeld N. Anxiety, alcohol, aphasia, and ums. J Pers Soc Psychol 1996, 70(3):451-460.
24. Watson D., Friend R. Measurement of social-evaluative anxiety. J Consult Clin Psychol 1969, 33:48-457.
25. Cook M. Anxiety, speech disturbances and speech rate. Br J Soc Clin Psychol 1969, 8(1):13-21.
26. Mahl G.F. Everyday speech disturbances and anxiety: summary. Explorations in Nonverbal and Vocal Behavior 1987, 259. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
27. Schriberg E. Disfluencies in switchboard. In: Proceedings, International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP '96) Vol. Addendum, 11-14; October 3-6, 1996; Philadelphia, PA.
28. Burke D.M., Mackay D.G., Worthley J.S., Wade E. On the tip of the tongue: what causes word finding failures in young and older adults?. J Mem Lang 1991, 30:542-579.
29. Roster of Faculty and Professional Staff 2002-2003 2001, American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy, Alexandria, VA.
30. Maclay H., Osgood C.E. Hesitation phenomena in spontaneous English speech. Word 1959, 15:19-44.
31. Bortfield H., Leon S.D., Bloom J.E., et al. Disfluency rates in conversation: effects of age, relationship, topic, role, and gender. Lang Speech 2001, 44(2):123-147.
32. Schlenker B.R., Leary M.R. Social anxiety and self-presentation: a conceptualization and model. Psychol Bull 1982, 92:641-669.
33. Leary M.R. A brief version of the fear of negative evaluation scale. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 1983, 9(3):371-375.
34. McCroskey J.C. An Introduction to Rhetorical Communication 1982, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
35. Hourtman I.L., Bakker F.C. The anxiety thermometer: a validation study. J Pers Assess 1989, 53:575-582.
36. American Council on Pharmaceutical Education. Accreditation standards and guidelines. Available at: Accessed 11.10.11. http://www.acpe-accredit.org/pdf/S2007Guidelines2.0_ChangesIdentifiedInRed.pdf.
37. Babbage D.R., Ronan K.R. Philosophical worldview and personality factors in traditional and social scientists: studying the world in our own image. Pers Indiv Differ 2000, 28:405-420.