Telephone vs face-to-face cognitive behavioral therapy for depression

JAMA

Volumn 308, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 1090-1091

  Sarkar, Siddharth ^a   Gupta, Rishab ^b  

^a POSTGRADUATE INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH   (India)

^b ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIDEPRESSANT AGENT;

COGNITIVE THERAPY; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; DEPRESSION; DRUG USE; FACE TO FACE COGNITIVE BEHAVIORAL THERAPY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LETTER; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TELEPHONE COGNITIVE BEHAVIORAL THERAPY; THERAPY EFFECT; TREATMENT DURATION; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

EID: 84866353960     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: 15383598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/2012.jama.10723     Document Type: Letter

References (3)

1. Mohr DC, Ho J, Duffecy J, et al. Effect of telephone-administered vs face-to-face cognitive behavioral therapy on adherence to therapy and depression outcomes among primary care patients: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2012;307(21): 2278-2285.
2. Blatt SJ, Zuroff DC, Hawley LL, Auerbach JS. Predictors of sustained therapeutic change. Psychother Res. 2010;20(1):37-54.
3. Cipriani A, Furukawa TA, Salanti G, et al. Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 12 new-generation antidepressants: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis. Lancet. 2009;373(9665):746-758.