Doing, seeing, or both: Effects of learning condition on subsequent action perception

Social Neuroscience

Volumn 7, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 606-621

  Wiggett, Alison J ^a   Hudson, Matthew ^b   Clifford, Angela ^c   Tipper, Steven P ^a   Downing, Paul E ^a  

^a BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSIDAD DEL NORTE   (Colombia)

^c LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Action observation; Learning; Mirror systems

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MIRROR NEURON; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; VISION;

ADULT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LEARNING; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIRROR NEURONS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; VISION, OCULAR; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84866331556     PISSN: 17470919     EISSN: 17470927     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470919.2012.686926     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Aglioti, S. M., Cesari, P., Romani, M. and Urgesi, C. 2008. Action anticipation and motor resonance in elite basketball players. Nature Neuroscience, 11: 1109-1116.
2. Bach, P., Peatfield, N. A. and Tipper, S. P. 2007. Focusing on body sites: The role of spatial attention in action perception. Experimental Brain Research, 178: 509-517.
3. Bach, P. and Tipper, S. P. 2007. Implicit action encoding influences personal-trait judgments. Cognition, 102: 151-178.
4. Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Wohlschläger, A. and Prinz, W. 2000. Compatibility between observed and executed finger movements: Comparing symbolic, spatial and imitative cues. Brain and Cognition, 44: 124-143.
5. Buccino, G., Binkofski, F., Fink, G. R., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., Seitz, R. J., Zilles, K., Rizzolatti, G. and Freund, H.-J. 2001. Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: An fMRI study. European Journal of Neuroscience, 13: 400-404.
6. Buccino, G., Lui, F., Canessa, N., Patteri, I., Lagravinese, G., Benuzzi, F., Porro, C. A. and Rizzolatti, G. 2004a. Neural circuits involved in the recognition of actions performed by nonconspecifics: An fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16: 114-126.
7. Buccino, G., Vogt, S., Ritzl, A., Fink, G. R., Zilles, K., Freund, H.-J. and Rizzolatti, G. 2004b. Neural circuits underlying imitation learning of hand actions: An event-related fMRI study. Neuron, 42: 323-334.
8. Caggiano, V., Fogassi, L., Rizzolatti, G., Pomper, J. K., Thier, P., Giese, M. A. and Casile, A. 2011. View-based encoding of actions in mirror neurons of area f5 in macaque premotor cortex. Current Biology, 21: 144-148.
9. Calvo-Merino, B., Ehrenberg, S., Leung, D. and Haggard, P. 2010. Experts see it all: Configural effects in action observation. Psychological Research, 74: 400-406.
10. Calvo-Merino, B., Glaser, D. E., Grèzes, J., Passingham, R. E. and Haggard, P. 2005. Action observation and acquired motor skills: An fMRI study with expert dancers. Cerebral Cortex, 15: 1243-1249.
11. Calvo-Merino, B., Grèzes, J., Glaser, D. E., Passingham, R. E. and Haggard, P. 2006. Seeing or doing? Influence of visual and motor familiarity in action observation. Current Biology, 16: 1905-1910.
12. Casile, A. and Giese, M. A. 2006. Nonvisual motor training influences biological motion perception. Current Biology, 16: 69-74.
13. Catmur, C., Gillmeister, H., Bird, G., Liepelt, R., Brass, M. and Heyes, C. 2008. Through the looking glass: Counter-mirror activation following incompatible sensorimotor learning. European Journal of Neuroscience, 28: 1208-1215.
14. Catmur, C., Walsh, V. and Heyes, C. M. 2007. Sensorimotor learning configures the human mirror system. Current Biology, 17: 1527-1531.
15. Chong, T. T., Cunnington, R., Williams, M. A., Kanwisher, N. and Mattingley, J. B. 2008. fMRI adaptation reveals mirror neurons in human inferior parietal cortex. Current Biology, 18: 1576-1580.
16. Cook, R., Press, C., Dickinson, A. and Heyes, C. 2010. Acquisition of automatic imitation is sensitive to sensorimotor contingency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36: 840-852.
17. Cross, E. S., Hamilton, A. F. de C. and Grafton, S. T. 2006. Building a motor simulation de novo: Observation of dance by dancers. NeuroImage, 31: 1257-1267.
18. Cross, E. S., Hamilton, A. F. de C., Kraemer, D. J. M., Kelley, W. M. and Grafton, S. T. 2009. Dissociable substrates for body motion and physical experience in the human action observation network. European Journal of Neuroscience, 30: 1383-1392.
19. Cross, E. S., Kraemer, D. J. M., Hamilton, A. F. de C., Kelley, W. M. and Grafton, S. T. 2009. Sensitivity of the action observation network to physical and observational learning. Cerebral Cortex, 19: 315-326.
20. Dinstein, I., Gardner, J. L., Jazayeri, M. and Heeger, D. J. 2008. Executed and observed movements have different distributed representations in human aIPS. Journal of Neuroscience, 28: 11231-11239.
21. Dinstein, I., Hasson, U., Rubin, N. and Heeger, D. J. 2007. Brain areas selective for both observed and executed movements. Journal of Neurophysiology, 98: 1415-1427.
22. Di Pellegrino, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V. and Rizzolatti, G. 1992. Understanding motor events: A neurophysiological study. Experimental Brain Research, 91: 176-189.
23. Etzel, J. A., Gazzola, V. and Keysers, C. 2008. Testing simulation theory with cross-modal multivariate classification of fMRI data. PLoS One, 3: e3690
24. Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Pavesi, G. and Rizzolatti, G. 1995. Motor facilitation during action observation: A magnetic stimulation study. Journal of Neurophysiology, 73: 2608-2611.
25. Gazzola, V. and Keysers, C. 2009. The observation and execution of actions share motor and somatosensory voxels in all tested subjects: Single-subject analyses of unsmoothed fMRI data. Cerebral Cortex, 19: 1239-1255.
26. Greenwald, A. G. 1970. Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: With special reference to the ideomotor mechanism. Psychological Review, 77: 73-99.
27. Grezes, J. and Decety, J. 2001. Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: A meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 12: 1-19.
28. Hamilton, A. F. and Grafton, S. T. 2006. Goal representation in human anterior intraparietal sulcus. Journal of Neuroscience, 26: 1133-1137.
29. Hamilton, A. F. and Grafton, S. T. 2008. Action outcomes are represented in human inferior frontoparietal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 18: 1160-1168.
30. Hardy, L. and Callow, N. 1999. Efficacy of external and internal visual imagery perspectives for the enhancement of performance on tasks in which form is important. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 21: 95-112.
31. Hétu, S., Mercier, C., Eugène, F., Michon, P. E. and Jackson, P. L. 2011. Modulation of brain activity during action observation: Influence of perspective, transitivity and meaningfulness. PLoS One, 6: e24728
32. Heyes, C. M. 2001. Causes and consequences of imitation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5: 253-261.
33. Heyes, C. M. 2005. "Imitation by association". In Perspectives on imitation: From mirror neurons to memes, Edited by: Hurley, S. and Chater, N. 157-176. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. Heyes, C., Bird, G., Johnson, H. and Haggard, P. 2005. Experience modulates automatic imitation. Cognitive Brain Research, 22: 233-240.
35. Heyes, C. and Ray, E. 2000. What is the significance of imitation in animals?. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 29: 215-245.
36. Hickok, G. 2009. Eight problems for the mirror neuron theory of action understanding in monkeys and humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21: 1229-1243.
37. Hommel, B., Musseler, J., Aschersleben, G. and Prinz, W. 2001. The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24: 849-878.
38. Kawato, M. 1999. Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 9: 718-727.
39. Keysers, C. and Perrett, D. I. 2004. Demystifying social cognition: A Hebbian perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8: 501-550.
40. Kilner, J. M., Neal, A., Weiskopf, N., Friston, K. J. and Frith, C. D. 2009. Evidence of mirror neurons in human inferior frontal gyrus. Journal of Neuroscience, 29: 10153-10159.
41. Lingnau, A., Gesierich, B. and Caramazza, A. 2009. Asymmetric fMRI adaptation reveals no evidence for mirror neurons in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106: 9925-9930.
42. Mukamel, R., Ekstrom, A. D., Kaplan, J., Iacoboni, M. and Fried, I. 2010. Single-neuron responses in humans during execution and observation of actions. Current Biology, 20: 750-756.
43. Oosterhof, N. N., Tipper, S. P. and Downing, P. E. 2012. Viewpoint (in)dependence of action representations: An MVPA study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24: 975-989.
44. Oosterhof, N. N., Wiggett, A. J., Diedrichsen, J., Tipper, S. P. and Downing, P. E. 2010. Surface-based information mapping reveals crossmodal vision-action representations in human parietal and occipitotemporal cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 104: 1077-1089.
45. Rizzolatti, G. and Craighero, L. 2004. The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27: 169-192.
46. Romani, M., Cesari, P., Urgesi, C., Facchini, S. and Aglioti, S. M. 2005. Motor facilitation of the human cortico-spinal system during observation of bio-mechanically impossible movements. NeuroImage, 26: 755-763.
47. Serino, A., De Filippo, L., Casavecchia, C., Coccia, M., Shiffrar, M. and Làdavas, E. 2010. Lesions to the motor system affect action perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22: 413-426.
48. Strafella, A. P. and Paus, T. 2000. Modulation of cortical excitability during action observation: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study. NeuroReport, 11: 2289-2292.
49. Talairach, J. and Tournoux, P. 1988. Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain, Stuttgart: Thieme.