The affordable care act largely survives the supreme court's scrutiny-but barely

Health Affairs

Volumn 31, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 1659-1662

  Jost, Timothy Stoltzfus ^a  

^a WASHINGTON AND LEE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COURT; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; LAW; MEDICAID; TAX;

COMMERCE; MEDICAID; PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT; STATE HEALTH PLANS; SUPREME COURT DECISIONS; TAXES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84866324294     PISSN: 02782715     EISSN: 15445208     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0738     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, 567 U.S., 2012 WL 2427810 (2012 Jun 28).
2. [26] U.S. Code sec. 5000A(a) and (b).
3. U.S. Const. art. 1, sec. 8, cl. 1.
4. [42] U.S. Code sec. 1396a(a)(10)(A) (i)(VIII).
5. Crawford J. Roberts switched views to support health care law. CBS News [serial on the Internet]. 2012 Jul 1 [cited 2012 Jul 10]. Available from: http://www .cbsnews.com/8301-3460_162-57464549/roberts-switchedviews-to-uphold-health-care-law/
6. [26] U.S. Code sec. 7421(a)
7. U.S. Const. art. 1, sec. 8, cl. 3
8. [42] U.S. Code sec. 1395dd(a) and (b).
9. U.S. Const. art. 1, sec. 8, cl. 18.
10. Seven Sky v. Holder, 661 F.3d, 1, 53 (D.C. Cir. 2011).
11. Liberty University v. Geithner, 671 F.3d 391, 415 (4th Cir. 2011).
12. South Dakota v. Dole, 483 U.S. 203, 211-2 (1987).
13. Steward Machine Co. v. Davis, 301 U.S. 548, 590 (1937).