The effects of combined perirhinal and postrhinal damage on complex discrimination tasks

Hippocampus

Volumn 22, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 2059-2067

  Gastelum, Emily D ^a,d   Guilhardi, Paulo ^b,c   Burwell, Rebecca D ^a,b  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Beacon ABA Services Inc   (United States)

^d Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

Configural; Excitatory conditioning; Inhibitory conditioning; Parahippocampal; Timing

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BRAIN DAMAGE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; NONHUMAN; PARAHIPPOCAMPAL GYRUS; PERIRHINAL CORTEX; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; REWARD; TASK PERFORMANCE; WHITE NOISE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANIMALS; BRAIN INJURIES; CEREBRAL CORTEX; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RATS; RATS, LONG-EVANS;

EID: 84866324045     PISSN: 10509631     EISSN: 10981063     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hipo.22063     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Alvarado MC, Rudy JW. 1995. A comparison of kainic acid plus chochicine and ibotenic acid-induced hippocampal formation damage on four configural tasks in rats. Behav Neurosci 109: 1052-1062.
2. Aminoff E, Gronau N, Bar M. 2007. The parahippocampal cortex mediates spatial and nonspatial associations. Cereb Cortex 17: 1493-1503.
3. Bar M, Aminoff E. 2003. Cortical analysis of visual context. Neuron 38: 347-358.
4. Bartko SJ, Winters BD, Cowell RA, Saksida LM, Bussey TJ. 2007. Perceptual functions of perirhinal cortex in rats: Zero-delay object recognition and simultaneous oddity discriminations. J Neurosci 27: 2548-2559.
5. Bouton ME, Nelson JB. 1994. Context-specificity of target versus feature inhibition in a feature-negative discrimination. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 20: 51-65.
6. Bucci DJ, Burwell RD. 2004. Deficits in attentional orienting following damage to the perirhinal or postrhinal cortices. Behav Neurosci 118: 1117-1122.
7. Bucci DJ, Phillips RG, Burwell RD. 2000. Contributions of postrhinal and perirhinal cortex to contextual information processing. Behav Neurosci 114: 882-894.
8. Bucci DJ, Saddoris MP, Burwell RD. 2002. Contextual fear discrimination is impaired by damage to postrhinal or perirhinal cortex. Behav Neurosci 116: 479-488.
9. Burwell RD. 2001. The perirhinal and postrhinal cortices of the rat: Borders and cytoarchitecture. J Comp Neurol 437: 17-41.
10. Burwell RD, Amaral DG. 1998. Perirhinal and postrhinal cortices of the rat: Interconnectivity and connections with the entorhinal cortex. J Comp Neurol 391: 293-321.
11. Burwell RD, Bucci DJ, Sanborn MR, Jutras MJ. 2004. Postrhinal and perirhinal contributions to remote memory for context. J Neurosci 24: 11023-11028.
12. Campolattaro MM, Freeman JH. 2006a. Perirhinal cortex lesions impair feature-negative discrimination. Neurobiol Learn Mem 86: 205-213.
13. Campolattaro MM, Freeman JH. 2006b. Perirhinal cortex lesions impair simultaneous but not serial feature-positive discrimination learning. Behav Neurosci 120: 970-975.
14. Corodimas KP, LeDoux JE. 1995. Disruptive effects of posttraining perirhinal cortex lesions on conditioned fear: Contributions of contextual cues. Behav Neurosci 109: 613-619.
15. Davies M, Machin PE, Sanderson DJ, Pearce JM, Aggleton JP. 2007. Neurotoxic lesions of the rat perirhinal and postrhinal cortices and their impact on biconditional visual discrimination tasks. Behav Brain Res 176: 274-283.
16. Dolorfo CL, Amaral DG. 1998. The entorhinal cortex of the rat: Topographic organization of the cells of origin of the perforant path projection to the dentate gyrus. J Comp Neurol 398: 25-48.
17. Eacott MJ, Machin PE, Gaffan EA. 2001. Elemental and configural visual discrimination learning following lesions to perirhinal cortex in the rat. Behav Brain Res 124: 55-70.
18. Eichenbaum H. 2000. A cortical-hippocampal system for declarative memory. Nat Rev Neurosci 1: 41-50.
19. Gallagher M, Holland PC. 1992. Preserved configural learning and spatial learning impairment in rats with hippocampal damage. Hippocampus 2: 81-88.
20. Gilbert PE, Kesner RP. 2003. Recognition memory for complex visual discriminations is influenced by stimulus interference in rodents with perirhinal cortex damage. Learn Mem 10: 525-530.
21. Guilhardi P, Church RM. 2005. Dynamics of temporal discrimination. Learn Behav 33: 399-416.
22. Han J-S, Holland P, Gallagher M. 1998. Hippocampal lesions enhance configural learning by reducing proactive interference. Behav Neurosci 113: 143-151.
23. Holland P, Reeve C. 1991. Acquisition and transfer of control by an ambiguous cue. Learn Behav 19: 113-124.
24. Holland PC. 1991. Transfer of control in ambiguous discriminations. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 17: 231-248.
25. Holland PC, Bouton ME. 1999. Hippocampus and context in classical conditioning. Curr Opin Neurobiol 9: 195-202.
26. Holland PC, Gallagher M. 1993. Amygdala central nucleus lesions disrupt increments, but not decrements, in conditioned stimulus processing. Behav Neurosci 107: 246-253.
27. Holland PC, Lamoureux JA, Han J-S, Gallagher M. 1999. Hippocampal lesions interfere with Pavlovian negative occasion setting. Hippocampus 9: 143-157.
28. Jarrard LE, Meldrum BS. 1993. Selective excitotoxic pathology in the rat hippocampus. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 19: 381-389.
29. Kerr KM, Agster KL, Furtak SC, Burwell RD. 2007. Functional neuroanatomy of the parahippocampal region: The lateral and medial entorhinal areas. Hippocampus 17: 697-708.
30. Kholodar-Smith DB, Allen TA, Brown TH. 2008a. Fear conditioning to discontinuous auditory cues requires perirhinal cortical function. Behav Neurosci 122: 1178-1185.
31. Kholodar-Smith DB, Boguszewski P, Brown TH. 2008b. Auditory trace fear conditioning requires perirhinal cortex. Neurobiol Learn Mem 90: 537-543.
32. Moyer JRJr, Brown TH. 2006. Impaired trace and contextual fear conditioning in aged rats. Behav Neurosci 120: 612-624.
33. Mullally SL, Maguire EA. 2011. A new role for the parahippocampal cortex in representing space. J Neurosci 31: 7441-7449.
34. Norman G, Eacott MJ. 2005. Dissociable effects of lesions to the perirhinal cortex and the postrhinal cortex on memory for context and objects in rats. Behav Neurosci 119: 557-566.
35. Peterson MA, Cacciamani L, Barense MD, Scalf PE. 2012. The perirhinal cortex modulates V2 activity in response to the agreement between part familiarity and configuration familiarity. Hippocampus.Behav Neurosci 22: 1965-1977.
36. Preston AR, Gabrieli JD. 2008. Dissociation between explicit memory and configural memory in the human medial temporal lobe. Cereb Cortex 18: 2192-2207.
37. Rudy JW, Sutherland RJ. 1989. The hippocampal formation is necessary for rats to learn and remember configural discriminations. Behav Brain Res 34: 97-109.
38. Saksida LM, Bussey TJ, Buckmaster CA, Murray EA. 2007. Impairment and facilitation of transverse patterning after lesions of the perirhinal cortex and hippocampus, respectively. Cereb Cortex 17: 108-115.
39. Sanderson DJ, Rawlins JN, Deacon RM, Cunningham C, Barkus C, Bannerman DM. 2011. Hippocampal lesions can enhance discrimination learning despite normal sensitivity to interference from incidental information. Hippocampus 22: 1553-1566.
40. Squire LR, Stark CE, Clark RE. 2004. The medial temporal lobe. Annu Rev Neurosci 27: 279-306.
41. Sutherland RJ, Rudy JW. 1990. Configural association theory: The role of the hippocampal formation in learning, memory, and amnesia. Psychobiology 17: 129-144.
42. Watson HC, Wilding EL, Graham KS. 2012. A role for perirhinal cortex in memory for novel object-context associations. J Neurosci 32: 4473-4481.
43. Wiig KA, Burwell RD. 1998. Memory impairment on a delayed-non-matching-to-position task following lesions of the perirhinal cortex in the rat. Behav Neurosci 112: 828-838.
44. Wisden W, Seeburg PH. 1993. A complex mosaic of high-affinity kainate receptors in rat brain. J Neurosci 13: 3582-3598.