Designing and Evaluating the Campus Organ Donor Project

Communication Quarterly

Volumn 60, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 504-519

  Weber, Keith ^a   Martin, Matthew M ^a  

^a WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Campaigns; Evaluation; Organ Donation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84866318328     PISSN: 01463373     EISSN: 17464102     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01463373.2012.704575     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Arbuckle, J. L., & Wothke, W. (1999). Amos 4.0 user's guide. Chicago, IL: SPSS.
2. Bagozzi, R. P., Lee, K. H., & Van Loo, M. F. (2001). Decisions to donate bone marrow: The role of attitudes and subjective norms across cultures. Psychology & Health, 16, 29-56. doi:10.1080/08870440108405488
3. Bless, H., & Schwarz, N. (1999). Sufficient and necessary conditions in the dual-process models: The case of mood and information processing. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in psychology (pp. 423-440). New York: Guilford.
4. Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Conner, M., & Armitage, C. J. (1998). Extending the theory of planned behavior: A review and avenues for further research. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 1429-1464. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01685.x
6. Cosse, T. J., & Weisenberger, T. M. (2000). Words versus actions about organ donation: A four-year tracking study of attitudes and self-reported behavior. Journal of Business Research, 50, 297-303. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(99)00024-7
7. Cox, J. (1986). Organ donation: The challenge for emergency nursing. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 12, 199-204.
8. DeJong, W., Franz, H. G., Wolfe, S. M., Nathan, H., Payne, D., Reitsma, W., & Beasley, C. (1998). Requesting organ donation: An interview study of donor and nondonor families. American Journal of Critical Care, 7, 13-23.
9. Dillard, J. P., & Meijnders, A. (2002). Persuasion and the structure of affect. In J. P. Dillard & M. Pfau (Eds.), The persuasion handbook (pp. 427-444). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Dillard, J. P., & Peck, E. (2001). Persuasion and the structure of affect: Dual systems and discrete emotions as complimentary models. Human Communication Research, 27, 38-68. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2001.tb00775.x
11. Feeley, T. H. (2007). College students' knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding organ donation: An integrated review of the literature. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 243-271. doi:10.1111/j.0021-9029.2007.00159.x
12. Feeley, T. H., Marshall, H. M., & Reinhart, A. M. (2006). Reactions to narrative and statistical written messages promoting organ donation. Communication Reports, 19, 89-100. doi:10.1080/08934210600918758
13. Feeley, T. H., & Moon, S. (2009). A meta-analytic review of communication campaigns to promote organ donation. Communication Reports, 22, 63-73. doi:10.1080/08934210903258852
14. Feeley, T. H., & Servoss, T. J. (2005). Examining college students' intentions to become organ donors. Journal of Health Communication, 10, 237-249. doi:10.1080/10810730590934262
15. Feeley, T. H., & Vincent III, D. (2007). How organ donation is represented in newspaper articles in the United States. Health Communication, 21, 125-131. doi:10.1080/10410230701307022
16. Hall, K. L., Robbins, M. L., Pavia, A., Knott, J. E., Harris, L., & Mattice, B. (2007). Donation intentions among African American college students: Decisional balance and self-efficacy measures. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 30, 483-495. doi:10.1007/s10865-007-9121-8
17. Hatcher, L. (1994). A step by step approach to using the SAS system for factor analysis and structural equation modeling. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
18. Horton, R. L., & Horton, P. J. (1990). Knowledge regarding organ donation: Identifying and overcoming barriers to organ donation. Social Science & Medicine, 31, 791-800. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(90)90174-Q
19. Horton, R. L., & Horton, P. J. (1991). A model of willingness to become a potential organ donor. Social Science & Medicine, 33, 1037-1051. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(91)90009-2
20. Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. (1955). Personal influence. New York: The Free Press.
21. Kopfman, J. E., & Smith, S. W. (1996). Understanding the audiences of a health communication campaign: A discriminant analysis of potential organ donors based on intent to donate. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 24, 33-49. doi:10.1080/00909889609365438
22. Kopfman, J. E., Smith, S. W., Yun, J. K. A., & Hodges, A. (1998). Affective and cognitive reactions to narrative versus statistical evidence organ donation messages. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 26, 279-300. doi:10.1080/00909889809365508
23. Lenehan, G. P. (1986). The gift of life: Organ donation and the emergency nurse. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 12, 189-191.
24. Marshall, H. M., & Feeley, T. H. (2006). A normative approach to shaping college students' attitudes toward organ donation. Communication Studies, 57, 435-453. doi:10.1080/10510970600946343
25. McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. A. (1992). Introduction to interpersonal communication. Edina, MN: Burgess International Group.
26. McDonald, D. D., Ferreri, R., Jin, C., Mendez, A., Smail, J., et al. (2007). Willingness to communicate organ donor intention. Public Health Nursing, 24, 151-159. doi:10.1111/j.1525-1446.2007.00619.x
27. Morgan, S. E. (2009). The intersection of conversation, cognitions, and campaigns: The social representation of organ donation. Communication Theory, 19, 29-48. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.01331.x
28. Morgan, S. E., & Harrison, T. R. (2010). The impact of health communication research on organ donation outcomes in the United States. Health Communication, 25, 589-592. doi:10.1080/10410236.2010.496834
29. Morgan, S. E., Harrison, T. R., Afifi, W. A., Long, S. D., & Stephenson, M. T. (2008). In their own words: The reasons why people will (not) sign an organ donor card. Health Communication, 23, 23-33. doi:10.1080/10410230701805158
30. Morgan, S. E., Harrison, T. R., Chewning, L., Davis, L., & DiCorcia, M. (2007). Entertainment (mis)education: The framing of organ donation in entertainment television. Health Communication, 22, 143-151. doi:10.1080/10410230701454114
31. Morgan, S. E., & Miller, J. K. (2002). Communicating about gifts of life: The effect of knowledge, attitudes, and altruism on behavior and behavioral intentions regarding organ donation. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 30, 163-178. doi:10.1080/00909880216580
32. Morgan, S. E., Miller, J. K., & Arasaratnam, L. A. (2002). Signing cards, saving lives: An evaluation of the worksite organ donation promotion project. Communication Monographs, 69, 253-273. doi:10.1080/03637750216540
33. Nabi, R. L. (2002). Discrete emotions and persuasion. In J. P. Dillard & M. Pfau (Eds.), The persuasion handbook (pp. 427-444). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Issue involvement as a moderator of the effects on attitude of advertising content and context. Advances in Consumer Research, 8, 20-24.
35. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986a). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag.
36. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986b). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123-208. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2
37. Prochaska, J. O., DiClemente, C. C., & Norcross, J. C. (1992). In search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviors. American Psychologist, 47, 1102-1114. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.47.9.1102
38. Quick, B. L., Kim, D. K., & Meyer, K. (2009). A 15-year review of ABC, CBS, and NBC news coverage of organ donation: Implications for organ donation campaigns. Health Communication, 24, 137-145. doi:10.1080/10410230802676516
39. Radecki, C. M., & Jaccard, J. (1999). Signing an organ donation letter: The prediction of behavior from behavioral intentions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 1833-1853. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb00154.x
40. Reinhart, A. M., Marshall, H. M., Feeley, T. H., & Tutzauer, F. (2007). The persuasive effects of message framing in organ donation: The mediating role of psychological reactance. Communication Monographs, 74, 229-255. doi:10.1080/03637750701397098
41. Sanner, M. (1994). Attitudes toward organ donation and transplantation. Social Science & Medicine, 38, 1141-1152. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(94)90229-1
42. Sanner, M., Hedman, H., & Tufveson, G. (1995). Evaluation of an organ-donor-card campaign in Sweden. Clinical Transplantation, 9, 326-333.
43. Singh, M., Katz, R. C., Beauchamp, K., & Hannon, R. (2002). Effects of anonymous information about potential organ transplant recipients on attitudes toward organ transplantation and the willingness to donate organs. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 25, 469-476. doi:10.1023/A:1020471007837
44. Slater, M. D. (1999). Integrating application of media effects, persuasion, and behavior change theories to communication campaigns: A stages-of-change framework. Health Communication, 11, 335-354. doi:10.1207/S15327027HC1104_2
45. Spital, A. (1992). Mandated choice: The preferred solution to the organ donor shortage? Archives of Internal Medicine, 152, 2421-2424. doi:10.1001/archinte.1992.00400240045007
46. Terry, D. J., & Hogg, M. A. (1996). Group norms and the attitude-behavior relationship: A role for group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 776-793. doi:10.1177/0146167296228002
47. United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS). (2010). Homepage. Retrieved from the United Network for Organ Sharing website:http://www.UNOS.org
48. Weber, K., Martin, M. M., Members of COMM401, & Corrigan, M. (2006). Creating persuasive messages advocating organ donation. Communication Quarterly, 54, 67-88. doi:10.1080/01463370500270413
49. Weber, K., Martin, M. M., Members of COMM401, & Corrigan, M. (2007). Real donors, real consent: Testing the theory of reasoned action on organ donor consent. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 2435-2456. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00265.x
50. Wegener, T. D., & Petty, R. E. (2001). Understanding the effects of mood through the elaboration likelihood and flexible correction models. In L. L. Martin & G. L. Clore (Eds.), Theories of mood and cognition: A user's guidebook (pp. 177-210). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.