A first step forward: Context assessment

New Directions for Evaluation

Volumn 2012, Issue 135, 2012, Pages 89-105

  Conner, Ross F ^a   Fitzpatrick, Jody L ^b   Rog, Debra J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^c Rockville Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84866306182     PISSN: 10976736     EISSN: 1534875X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ev.20029     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Dahler-Larsen, J., & Schwandt, T. A. (2012). Political culture as context for evaluation. In D. J. Rog, J. L. Fitzpatrick, & R. F. Conner (Eds.), Context: A framework for its influence on evaluation practice. New Directions for Evaluation, 135, 75-87.
2. Fitzpatrick, J., Christie, C., & Mark, M. (2009). Evaluation in action: Interviews with expert evaluators. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. LaFrance, J., Nichols, R., & Kirkhart, K. E. (2012). Culture writes the script: On the centrality of context in indigenous evaluation. In D. J. Rog, J. L. Fitzpatrick, & R. F. Conner (Eds.), Context: A framework for its influence on evaluation practice. New Directions for Evaluation, 135, 59-74.
4. Rog, D. J. (2009, November). Toward context-sensitive evaluation practice. Presidential Address. Evaluation 2009: 23rd annual conference of the American Evaluation Association, Orlando, FL.
5. Rog, D. J. (2012). When background becomes foreground: Toward context-sensitive evaluation practice. In D. J. Rog, J. L. Fitzpatrick, & R. F. Conner (Eds.), Context: A framework for its influence on evaluation practice. New Directions for Evaluation, 135, 25-40.
6. Thurston, L. P., Smith, C. A., Genskow, K., Prokopy, L. S., & Hargrove, W. L. (2012). The social context of water quality improvement evaluation. In D. J. Rog, J. L. Fitzpatrick, & R. F. Conner (Eds.), Context: A framework for its influence on evaluation practice. New Directions for Evaluation, 135, 41-58.