Governance in and of technoeconomic paradigm shifts: Considerations for and from the nanotechnology surge

Techno-Economic Paradigms: Essays in Honour of Carlota Perez

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 95-104

  Drechsler, Wolfgang ^a  

^a TALLINN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Estonia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84866300741     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.7135/UPO9781843318224.008     Document Type: Chapter

References (30)

1. Castells, M. 2001. The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business, and Society. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Dolata, U. and R. Werle (eds). 2007. Gesellschaft und die Macht der Technik: Sozioökonomischer und institutioneller Wandel durch Technisierung. Frankfurt/Main/New York: Campus.
3. Drechsler, W. 1997. ‘Carl Schmitt: The Leviathan in the State Theory of Thomas Hobbes.’ Perspectives on Political Science26, 125-126.
4. Drechsler, W. 2002. ‘Darin Barney: Prometheus Wired: The Hope for Democracy in the Age of Network Technology, and Hubert L. Dreyfus: On the Internet.’ Philosophy in Review/Comptes Rendus Philosophiques22, 86-89.
5. Drechsler, W. 2003. ‘Good Governance.’ In [Hanno] Drechsler, Hilligen and Neumann (eds). Gesellschaft und Staat. Lexikon der Politik. 10th edn. München: Franz Vahlen (C. H. Beck).
6. Drechsler, W. 2004. ‘Governance, Good Governance, and Government: The Case for Estonian Administrative Capacity.’ Governance and Good Governance, Trames8, 388-396.
7. Drechsler, W. 2005. ‘eGovernment and Public Management Reform.’ Plenary lecture, eGovernance Catalonia Forum ‘05: Public Administration in the age of the Internet.’ Barcelona, 13 June. Available at http://www.gencat.net/forum-egovernance/2005/cat/ponencies.htm
8. Drechsler, W. 2009. ‘NanoGov: Nanotechnologie, Innovation, Governance und Verwaltung aus der Perspektive der Techno-Ökonomischen Paradigmen.’ In A. Scherzberg and J. Wendorff (eds). Nanotechnologie: Grundlagen, Anwendungen, Risiken, Regulierung. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter Recht, 307-325.
9. Drechsler, W. and R. Kattel. 2009. ‘Conclusion: Towards the Neo-Weberian State? Perhaps, but Certainly Adieu, NPM!’ In C. Pollitt et al. A Distinctive European Model? The Neo-Weberian State. The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy1, 2, 95-99.
10. Drechsler, W. et al. 2006. ‘Creative Destruction Management in Central and Eastern Europe: Meeting the Challenges of the Techno-Economic Paradigm Shift.’ In T. Kalvet and R. Kattel (eds). Creative Destruction Management: Meeting the Challenges of the Techno-Economic Paradigm Shift. Tallinn: PRAXIS Center for Policy Studies, 15-30.
11. Drexler, K. E. 2007. Engines of Creation 2.0: The Coming Era of Nanotechnology. Updated and expanded edn. WOWIO Books (www.wowio.com).
12. Gehlen, A. 1970 [1957]. Die Seele im technischen Zeitalter: Sozialpsychologische Probleme in der industriellen Gesellschaft. Hamburg: Rowohlt.
13. Kattel, R. 2004. ‘Governance of Innovation Policy: The Case of Estonia.’ Governance and Good Governance, Trames8, 397-418.
14. Nelson, R. R. 2003. Review of Perez 2002. Journal of Socio-Economics2, 467-469.
15. Nordmann, A., J. Schummer and A. Schwarz (eds). 2006. Nanotechnologien im Kontext: Philosophische, ethische und gesellschaftliche Perspektiven. Berlin: Akademischen Verlagsgesellschaft.
16. Perez, C. 2002. Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital: The Dynamics of Bubbles and Golden Ages, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. [74.1]
17. Perez, C. 2004a. ‘Technological Revolutions, Paradigm Shifts and Socio-Institutional Change.’ In E. S. Reinert (ed.). Globalization, Economic Development and Inequality: An Alternative Perspective. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 217-242. [75.1]
18. Perez, C. 2004b. ‘The Context for Innovation Policies and Strategies after the Financial Frenzy of the 1990s.’ Keynote address, 4th European Forum for Innovative Enterprises, Stuttgart, 6 December (ppt).
19. Perez, C. 2006a. ‘Respecialisation and the Deployment of the ICT Paradigm: An Essay on the Present Challenges of Globalization.’ In R. Compañó et al. (eds). The Future of the Information Society in Europe: Contributions to the Debate, [Seville:] IPTS/Luxembourg: OOPEC, EUR 22353 EN, 33-66. [77.2]
20. Perez, C. 2006b. ‘The Turning Point: An Open Stage for Socio-Political Choice.’ Lecture, 40th Anniversary of the Research Policy Institute/CIRCLE, Lund University, Lund, September (ppt).
21. Perez, C. 2007. ‘Technological Revolutions, Paradigm Shifts, and Social Goals.’ The 2007 Marie Jahoda Annual Lecture, SPRU, University of Sussex, Brighton, October (ppt).
22. Perez, C. and C. Freeman. 1988. ‘Structural Crises of Adjustment, Business Cycles and Investment Behaviour.’ In G. Dosi et al. (eds). Technical Change and Economic Theory. London: Pinter, 38-66. [20.1]
23. Pollitt, C. and G. Bouckaert. 2004. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis. 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24. Pollitt, C. et al. 2009. A Distinctive European Model? The Neo-Weberian State. The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 1, 2.
25. Reinert, E. S. 1999. ‘The Role of the State in Economic Growth.’ Journal of Economic Studies26, 268-326.
26. Rochet, C. 2007. L’innovation, une affaire d’Etat: Gagnants et perdants de la IIIe révolution industrielle. Paris: L’Harmattan.
27. Roco, M. C. and W. S. Bainbridge (eds). 2003. Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance: Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology and the Cognitive Science. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
28. Schummer, J. and D. Baird. 2006. Nanotechnology Challenges: Implications for Philosophy, Ethics and Society. Singapore: World Scientific.
29. Smith, M. R. and L. Marx. 1994. Does Technology Drive History? The Dilemma of Technological Determinism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. Wade, R. 2003. Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization. Reprint. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.