Embryonic pretreatment with bromodeoxyuridine blocks regeneration and functional recovery from perinatal medial frontal lesions in rats

Developmental Neuroscience

Volumn 34, Issue 2-3, 2012, Pages 228-239

  Kolb, Bryan ^a   Pedersen, Brian ^a   Gibb, Robbin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LETHBRIDGE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU); Neurogenesis; Prefrontal cortex

Indexed keywords

BROXURIDINE;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BODY WEIGHT; BRAIN WEIGHT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; FEMALE; FRONTAL CORTEX; GOLGI STAIN; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; MITOSIS RATE; NEOCORTEX; NERVOUS SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT; NONHUMAN; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PYRAMIDAL NERVE CELL; RAT; TISSUE REGENERATION;

ANIMALS; BRAIN INJURIES; BROMODEOXYURIDINE; MAZE LEARNING; NERVE REGENERATION; NEURONS; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; RATS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION;

EID: 84866298416     PISSN: 03785866     EISSN: 14219859     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000336645     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Freeman JH Jr, Stanton ME: Medial prefrontal lesions and spatial delayed alternation in the developing rat: Recovery or sparing? Behav Neurosci 1992; 106: 924-932.
2. Kolb B, Whishaw IQ: Neonatal frontal lesions in the rat: Sparing of learned but not species-typical behavior in the presence of reduced brain weight and cortical thickness. J Comp Physiol Psychol 1981; 95: 863-879.
3. Nonneman AJ, et al: Functional development of the prefrontal system; in Finger S, Almli CR (eds): Early Brain Damage. New York, Academic Press, 1984, vol 2, pp 139- 153.
4. Schneider M, Koch M: Behavioral and morphological alterations following neonatal excitotoxic lesions of the medial frontal cortex in rats. Exp Neurol 2005; 195: 185-198.
5. Kolb B: Recovery from early cortical damage in rats. 1. Differential behavioral and anatomical effects of frontal lesions at different ages of neural maturation. Behav Brain Res 1987; 25: 205-220.
6. Kolb B, Gibb R: Anatomical correlates of behavioural change after neonatal prefrontal lesions in rats. Prog Brain Res 1990; 85: 241- 256.
7. de Brabander J, Kolb B: Development of pyramidal cells in medial frontal cortex following neonatal lesions of anterior midline cortex. Restor Neurol Neurosci 1997; 11: 91-97.
8. Kolb B, Petrie B, Cioe J: Recovery from early cortical damage in rats. 7. Comparison of the behavioural and anatomical effects of medial prefrontal lesions at different ages of neural maturation. Behav Brain Res 1996; 79: 1-13.
9. Kolb B, et al: Possible regeneration of rat medial frontal cortex following neonatal frontal lesions. Behav Brain Res 1998; 91: 127- 141.
10. Driscoll I, et al: Neurophysiological properties of cells filling the neonatal medial prefrontal cortex lesion cavity. Brain Res 2007; 1178: 1209-1218.
11. Dallison A, Kolb B: Recovery from infant frontal cortical lesions in rats can be reversed by cortical lesions in adulthood. Behav Brain Res 2003; 146: 57-63.
12. Monfils MH, et al: Basic fibroblast growth factor stimulates functional recovery after neonatal lesions of motor cortex in rats. Neuroscience 2005; 134: 1-8.
13. Monfils MH, et al: FGF-2-induced cell proliferation stimulates anatomical, neurophysiological, and functional recovery from neonatal motor cortex injury. Eur J Neurosci 2006; 24: 739-749.
14. Kolb B, et al: Embryonic and postnatal injections of bromodeoxyuridine produce agedependent morphological and behavioral abnormalities. J Neurosci 1999; 19: 2337- 2346.
15. Zilles K: The Cortex of the Rat: A Stereotaxic atlas. Berlin, Springer, 1985. 16 Sutherland RJ, Whishaw IQ, Kolb B: A behavioural analysis of spatial localization following electrolytic, kainate-, or colchicineinduced damage to the hippocampal formation in the rat. Behav Brain Res 1983; 7: 133-153.
16. Morris RGM: Spatial localization does not require the presence of local cues. Learn Motiv 1980; 12: 239-261.
17. Whishaw IQ, et al: The impairments in reaching and the movements of compensation in rats with motor cortex lesions: An
18. endpoint, videorecording, and movement notation analysis. Behav Brain Res 1991; 42: 77-91.
19. Gibb R, Kolb B: A method for Golgi-Cox staining of vibratome cut tissue. J Neurosci Methods 1998; 79: 1-4.
20. Stewart J, Kolb B: The effects of neonatal gonadectomy and prenatal stress on cortical thickness and asymmetry in rats. Behav Neural Biol 1988; 49: 344-360.
21. Coleman PD, Riesen AH: Environmental effects on cortical dendritic fields. 1. Rearing in the dark. J Anat 1968; 102: 363-374.
22. Sholl DA: The Organization of the Cerebral Cortex. London, Methuen, 1956.
23. Kolb B, Whishaw IQ: Plasticity in the neocortex: Mechanisms underlying recovery from early brain damage. Progr Neurobiol 1989; 32: 235-276.
24. Kolb B: Brain Plasticity and Behavior. Mahwah, Erlbaum, 1995.
25. Kolb B, Gibb R: Brain plasticity and recovery from early cortical injury. Dev Psychobiol 2007; 49: 107-118.
26. Kolb B, Gibb R, van der Kooy D: Neonatal frontal cortical lesions in rats alter cortical structure and connectivity. Brain Res 1994; 645: 85-97.
27. Kolb B, Stewart J, Sutherland RJ: Recovery of function is associated with increased spine density in cortical pyramidal cells after frontal lesions or noradrenaline depletion in neonatal rats. Behav Brain Res 1997; 89: 61-70.
28. Dyck RH, Lazareck SL, Melvin NR: Cortical regeneration in mice following postnatal injury. J Int Soc Dev Neurosci 2002; 19: 711.
29. Lois C, Alvarez-Buylla A: Proliferating subventricularzone cells in the adult mammalian forebrain can differentiate into neurons and glia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994; 90: 2074-2077.
30. Kolb B, et al: Proliferation of neural stem cells in vitro and in vivo is reduced by infant frontal cortex lesions or prenatal BrdU. Soc Neurosci Abstr 1999; 25: 296.1.
31. Kolb B, et al: Growth factor-stimulated generation of new cortical tissue and functional recovery after stroke damage to the motor cortex of rats. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2007; 27: 983-397.
32. Agnish ND, Kochhar DM: Direct exposure of postimplantation mouse embryos to 5-bromodeoxyuridine in vitro and its effect on subsequent chondrogenesis in the limbs. J Embryol Exp Morphol 1976; 36: 623-638.
33. Bannigan J, Langman J: The cellular effect of 5-bromodeoxyuridine on the mammalian embryo. J Embryol Exp Morphol 1976; 50: 123-135.
34. Dolbeare F: Bromodeoxyuridine: A diagnostic tool in biology and medicine. 1. Historical perspectives, histochemical methods and cell kinetics. Histochem J 1994; 27: 339-369.
35. Flore M, et al: Bromodeoxyuridine and methylazoxymethanol exposure during brain development affects behavior in rats
36. consideration for the role of nerve growth factor and brain derived neurotrophic factor. Neurosci Lett 2001; 309: 113-116.
37. Kuwagata M, et al: The evaluation of early embryonic neurogenesis after exposure to the genotoxic agent 5-bromo-deoxyuridine in mice. Neurotoxicology 2007; 28: 780- 789.
38. Shah RM, King KO, Feeley EJ: Pathogenesis of bromodeoxyuridine - Induced cleft palate in hamster. Am J Anat 1991; 190: 219-230.
39. Yu WHA: The effect of 5-bromodeoxyuridine on the postnatal development of the rat cerebellum: A biochemical study. Brain Res 1976; 118: 281-291.
40. Gould E, et al: Proliferation of granule cell precursors in the dentate gyrus of adult monkeys is diminished by stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95: 3168-3171.
41. Kempermann G, Kuhn HG, Gage FH: Experience- induced neurogenesis in the senescent dentate gyrus. J Neurosci 1998; 18: 3206- 3212.