Postpericardiotomy syndrome - Post-cardiac injury syndrome

Bratislava Medical Journal

Volumn 113, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 481-485

  Bucekova, E ^a   Simkova, I ^b   Hulman M ^a  

^a National Institute of Cardiovacular Diseases   (Slovakia)

^b SLOVAK MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Slovakia)

Author keywords

Diagnose; Etiology; Heart operation; Pericardial effusion; Pericarditis; Postpericardiotomy syndrome

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION;

HUMANS; POSTPERICARDIOTOMY SYNDROME;

EID: 84866286026     PISSN: 00069248     EISSN: 13360345     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4149/bll_2012_106     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Spodick DH. Pericardial disease. In: Braunwald E, Zippes DP, Libby P (Eds). Heart Disease. 6th ed. Philadelphia-London-Toronto-Montreal-Sydney-Tokyo: W.B. Saunders, 2001, 1823-1876.
2. Maisch B, Berg PA, Kochsiek K. Clinical significance of Immuno-pathological findings in patients with post-pericardiotomy syndromes. I. Relevance of antibody pattern. Clin Exp Immunol 1979; 38: 189-197. (Pubitemid 10196183)
3. Buckman RF, Buckman PD. Vertical deceleration trauma: priciples of management Surg Clin North Am 1991; 71: 331-340.
4. Kuvin JT, Hárati NA, Pandian NG et al. Postoperative cardiac tam-ponade in the modern surgical era. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 74:1148-1153. (Pubitemid 35176736)
5. Asensio JA, Berne JD, Demetriades D et al. Penetrating cardiac in-juries: a prospective study of variables predicting aoutcomes. J Am Coll Surg 1998; 186: 24-34. (Pubitemid 28104039)
6. Morton MJ, DeMots HL. Complications of transseptal cathetrization and transthoracic left ventriculare puncture. In: Kron J, Morton MJ, edi-tors. Complications of cardiac cathetrization and angiography. New York: Futura, 1989,77-103.
7. Engle MU, McCabe JC, Ebert PA et al. Postpericardiotomy syndrome and antiheart antibodies. Circulation 1974; 9: 401.
8. Levine MJ, Lorell BH, Diver DJ et al. Implications of echocardio-graphically of echocardiographically assisted diagnosis of pericardial tam-ponade in contemporary medical patients; detection before hemodynamic embarrassment. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 17: 59-65.
9. D'Cruz IA, Hoffman PK. A new cross sectional echocardiographic method of estimating the volume of large - pericardial effusion. Br Heart J 1991; 66: 448.
10. D'CruzIA, Cohen HC, Prabhu R et al. Diagnosis of cardiac tam-ponade by echocardiography. Changes in mitral valve motion and ven-tricular dimensions, with special reference to paradoxal pulse. Circulation 1975;52:460-5.
11. Haaz WS, Mintz GS, Kotler MN, Parry W et al. Two-dimensional echocardiographic recognition of the descending thoracic aorta value in dif-ferentiating pericardial from pleural effusion. Am J Cardiol 1980; 46:739.
12. Marinella M A. Electrocardiographic manifestation and differential diagnosis of acute pericarditis. Amer Farn Phys 1998; 57: 532.
13. Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Management of Pericardial Dis-eases. Full text: The task force on the diagnosis and management of pericardial diseases of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2004; 15: 1-28.
14. Horneffer PJ, Miller RH, Pearson TA, Rykiel MF, Reitz BA, Gard-ner TJ. Effective treatment of postpericardiotomy syndrome after cardiac operations: J Thorac Cardiovcasc Surg 1990; 100: 292-296.
15. Filkenstein Y, Shemesh J, Mahlab K et al. Colchicine for the preven-tion of postpericardiotomy syndrome. Herz 2002; 27: 791-794.