A proposal for measuring interactivity that brings learning effectiveness

Knowledge Management and E-Learning

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 6-16

  Yamamoto, Tosh ^a  

^a KANAZAWA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

Author keywords

E Learning; Interactivity; Interests in Learning; Learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84866257156     PISSN: 20737904     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Dewey, J. (1913). Interest And Effort in Education. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
2. Dewey, J. (1897). My Pedagogic Creed. School Journal, 54, 77-80.
3. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. New York: Touchstone.
4. Doll. R. C. (1996). Curriculum Improvement. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
5. Flinders, D.J., & Thornton, S.J. (1997). The Curriculum Studies Reader. New York: Routledge.
6. Geoghegan, W. H. (1994). Stuck at the barricades: Can information technology really enter the mainstream of teaching and learning? AAHE Bulletin, September, 13-16.
7. Jonassen, D., & Mayes, J.T. (1993). A Manifesto for a Constructivist Approach to Technology in Higher Education. Available online: http://www.icbl.hw.ac.uk/ctl/msc/ceejw1/paper11.html.
8. Pearce, C. (1997). the interactive book: A guide to the interactive revolution. Indianapolis: MacMillan Technical Publishing.
9. Reeves, T. (1992). Effective dimensions of interactive learning systems. Invited keynote paper presented at the Information Technology for Training and Technology (ITTE '92) Conference, Queensland, Australia.
10. Reeves, T., & Harmon, S. (1994). What's in a name: Hypermedia versus multimedia. Interact Journal, 3(1), 28-30.
11. Reeves, T. (1999). Evaluating Interactivity. A half day workshop in AECT 1999 Conference.
12. Thorndike, E. L. (1913). Educational Psychology. The psychology of learning (Vol.2). New York: Teachers College Press.
13. Tobin, K., & Dawson, G. (1992). Constraints to curriculum reform: Teachers and the myths of schooling. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40(1), 81-92.