Comparison of sagittal and vertical dental changes during first phase of orthodontic treatment with MBT vs ROTH prescription

Indian Journal of Dental Research

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 182-186

  Talapaneni, Ashok K ^a   Supraja, G ^a   Prasad, Mandava ^a   Kommi, Pradeep B ^a  

^a NARAYANA DENTAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL   (India)

Author keywords

Anchorage; canine lacebacks; MBT prescription; ROTH prescription

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CANINE TOOTH; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FIDUCIAL MARKER; HUMAN; INCISOR; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; MEDICAL PHOTOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; ORTHODONTICS; PATHOLOGY; PERIODONTAL DISEASE; PREMOLAR TOOTH; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TOOTH EXTRACTION; TOOTH OCCLUSION;

ADOLESCENT; BICUSPID; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; CUSPID; FEMALE; FIDUCIAL MARKERS; HUMANS; INCISOR; MALE; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS I; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; MOLAR; ORTHODONTIC ANCHORAGE PROCEDURES; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; ORTHODONTIC WIRES; PHOTOGRAPHY, DENTAL; TOOTH EXTRACTION; TOOTH MOVEMENT; VERTICAL DIMENSION;

EID: 84866256565     PISSN: 09709290     EISSN: 19983603     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290.100423     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Andrews LF. The Straight wire appliance. Explained and Compared. J Clin Orthod 1976;10:174-95.
2. Roth RH. The straight wire appliance 17 years later. J Clin Orthod 1987;21:632-42.
3. McLaughlin RP, Bennett JC, Trevisi HJ. Systemised Orthodontic Treatment Mechanics. Edinburgh: Mosby; 2001. p. 101-2.
4. McLaughlin RP, Bennett JC. Anchorage control during leveling and aligning with a preadjusted appliance system. J Clin Orthod 1991;25:687-96.
5. McLaughlin RP, Bennett JC. The transition from standard edge wise to pre-adjusted appliance systems. J Clin Orthod 1989;23:142-53.
6. Usmani T, O'Brien KD, Worthington HV, Derwent S, Fox D, Harrison S, et al. A randomized clinical trial to compare the effectiveness of canine lacebacks with reference to canine tip. J Orthod 2002:29:281-6.
7. Sueri MY, Turk T. Effectiveness of Laceback ligatures on maxillary canine retraction. Angle Orthod 2006;76:1010-4. (Pubitemid 44681153)
8. Hosseinzadeh-Nik T, Farrokhzadeh AM, Golestan B. Horizontal Dental Changes during First Stage of Treatment Using the MBT Technique. J Dent Tehran Univ Med Sci 2007;4:9-14.
9. Irvine R, Power S, McDonald F. The effectiveness of laceback ligatures: A randomized controlled clinical trial. J Orthod 2004:31;303-11.
10. Pancherz H. The mechanism of class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment. A Cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod 1982;82:104-13. (Pubitemid 13228842)
11. Graber TM, Vanarsdall AL, Vij KW. Orthodontics: Current principles and techniques. St. Louis, Missouri, Elsevier Mosby Inc; 2004. p. 278.
12. Evans TJ, Jones ML, Newcombe RG. Clinical comparison and performance perspective of three aligning arch wires. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114:32-9.
13. Daskalogiannakis J, McLachlan KR. Canine retraction with rare earth magnets: An investigation into the validity of the constant force hypothesis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;109:489-95.
14. Zablocki HL, McNamara JA Jr, Franchi L, Baccetti T. Effect of the transpalatal arch during extraction treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133:852-60.
15. Kojima Y, Fukui H. Effects of transpalatal arch on molar movement produced by mesial force: A finite element simulation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;134:335-6.
16. Huffman DJ, Way DC. A Clinical evaluation of tooth movement along arch wires of two different sizes. Am J Orthod 1983;83:453-9.
17. Ziegler P, Ingervall B. A Clinical study of maxillary canine retraction with a retraction spring and with sliding mechanics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989;95:99-106. (Pubitemid 19069089)