Informatics in radiology: Improving clinical work flow through an aim database: A sample web-based lesion tracking application

Radiographics

Volumn 32, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 1543-1552

  Abajian, Aaron C ^a   Levy, Mia ^b   Rubin, Daniel L ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT INGRAM CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; DATA MINING; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; HUMAN; INTERNET; METHODOLOGY; NEOPLASM; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; RADIOLOGY; WORKFLOW;

DATA MINING; HUMANS; INTERNET; NEOPLASMS; RADIOLOGY; RADIOLOGY INFORMATION SYSTEMS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; WORKFLOW;

EID: 84866236290     PISSN: 02715333     EISSN: 15271323     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/rg.325115752     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. van Persijn van Meerten EL, Gelderblom H, Bloem JL. RECIST revised: implications for the radiologist- a review article on the modified RECIST guideline. Eur Radiol 2010;20(6):1456-1467.
2. Therasse P, Eisenhauer EA, Verweij J. RECIST revisited: a review of validation studies on tumour assessment. Eur J Cancer 2006;42(8):1031-1039.
3. Hussein R, Engelmann U, Schroeter A, Meinzer HP. DICOM structured reporting. I. Overview and characteristics. RadioGraphics 2004;24(3):891-896.
4. DICOM reference guide. Health Devices 2001; 30(1-2):5-30.
5. Hussein R, Engelmann U, Schroeter A, Meinzer HP. DICOM structured reporting. II. Problems and challenges in implementation for PACS workstations. RadioGraphics 2004;24(3):897-909.
6. Channin DS, Mongkolwat P, Kleper V, Sepukar K, Rubin DL. The caBIG Annotation and Image Markup project. J Digit Imaging 2010; 23(2):217-225.
7. Rubin DL, Mongkolwat P, Channin DS. A semantic image annotation model to enable integrative translational research. Summit on Translat Bioinforma 2009;2009:106-110.
8. Bosak J, Bray T. XML and the Second-Generation Web. Sci Am 1999;280(5):89-93.
9. Han SH, Lee MH, Kim SG, et al. Implementation of Medical Information Exchange System based on EHR standard. Healthc Inform Res 2010;16(4):281-289.
10. Zimmerman SL, Kim W, Boonn WW. Informatics in radiology: automated structured reporting of imaging findings using the AIM standard and XML. RadioGraphics 2011;31(3):881-887.
11. Levy MA, Rubin DL. Tool support to enable evaluation of the clinical response to treatment. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2008 Nov 6:399-403.
12. Jaffe TA, Wickersham NW, Sullivan DC. Quantitative imaging in oncology patients. I. Radiology practice patterns at major U.S. cancer centers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195(1):101-106.
13. Jaffe TA, Wickersham NW, Sullivan DC. Quantitative imaging in oncology patients. II. Oncologists' opinions and expectations at major U.S. cancer centers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195(1):W19-W30.
14. Rosset A, Spadola L, Ratib O. OsiriX: an opensource software for navigating in multidimensional DICOM images. J Digit Imaging 2004; 17(3):205-216.
15. ClearCanvas. http://www.clearcanvas.ca/dnn. Accessed August 10, 2011.
16. Rubin DL, Korenblum D, Yeluri V, Frederick P, Herfkens R. Semantic annotation and image markup in a commercial PACS workstation (abstr). In: Radiological Society of North America scientific assembly and annual meeting program. Oak Brook, Ill: Radiological Society of North America, 2010; 333.
17. Rubin DL. Open-source tools to analyze, report, and communicate radiology results in the quantitative imaging era: quantitative imaging reading room of the future. Presented at the 96th Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting of the Radiological Society of North America, Chicago, Ill, November 28-December 3, 2010.
18. Rubin DL, Rodriguez C, Shah P, Beaulieu C. Ipad: semantic annotation and markup of radiological images. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2008 Nov 6:626-630.
19. Warnock MJ, Toland C, Evans D, Wallace B, Nagy P. Benefits of using the DCM4CHE DICOM archive. J Digit Imaging 2007;20(suppl 1):125-129.
20. Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Part 18: Web Access to DICOM Persistent Objects (WADO). ftp://medical.nema.org/ medical/dicom/2009/09_18pu.pdf. Accessed August 14, 2011.
21. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 2009;45(2):228-247.
22. Nishino M, Jagannathan JP, Ramaiya NH, Van den Abbeele AD. Revised RECIST guideline version 1.1: what oncologists want to know and what radiologists need to know. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195(2):281-289.
23. Google Web Toolkit. http://code.google.com/webtoolkit. Accessed August 10, 2011.
24. Apache Tomcat. http://tomcat.apache.org. Accessed August 10, 2011.
25. Erasmus JJ, Gladish GW, Broemeling L, et al. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in measurement of non-small-cell carcinoma lung lesions: implications for assessment of tumor response. J Clin Oncol 2003;21(13):2574-2582.
26. Channin DS, Mongkolwat P, Kleper V, Rubin DL. The Annotation and Image Mark-up project. Radiology 2009;253(3):590-592.
27. Iv M, Patel MR, Santos A, Kang YS. Use of a macro scripting editor to facilitate transfer of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry reports into an existing departmental voice recognition dictation system. RadioGraphics 2011;31(4):1181-1189.
28. Schwartz LH, Panicek DM, Berk AR, Li Y, Hricak H. Improving communication of diagnostic radiology findings through structured reporting. Radiology 2011;260(1):174-181.
29. Johnson AJ, Chen MY, Zapadka ME, Lyders EM, Littenberg B. Radiology report clarity: a cohort study of structured reporting compared with conventional dictation. J Am Coll Radiol 2010; 7(7):501-506.
30. Bosmans JM, Weyler JJ, De Schepper AM, Parizel PM. The radiology report as seen by radiologists and referring clinicians: results of the COVER and ROVER surveys. Radiology 2011;259(1):184-195.
31. Levy MA, Rubin DL. Current and future trends in imaging informatics for oncology. Cancer J 2011; 17(4):203-210.