Use of telehealth for research and clinical measures in cochlear implant recipients: A validation study

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

Volumn 55, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 1112-1127

  Hughes, Michelle L ^a   Goehring, Jenny L ^a   Baudhuin, Jacquelyn L ^a   Diaz, Gina R ^a   Sanford, Todd ^a   Harpster, Roger ^a   Valente, Daniel L ^a  

^a BOYS TOWN NATIONAL RESEARCH HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Cochlear implants; Technology; Telepractice

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDIOLOGY; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSYCHOPHYSICS; QUESTIONNAIRE; SPEECH PERCEPTION; STANDARD; TELEMEDICINE; UNITED STATES; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AUDIOLOGY; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CHILD; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEBRASKA; PROGRAM EVALUATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PSYCHOACOUSTICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TELEMEDICINE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84866183286     PISSN: 10924388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2011/11-0237)     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Abbas, P. J., Brown, C. J., Shallop, J. K., Firszt, J. B., Hughes, M. L., Hong, S. H., & Staller, S. J. (1999). Summary of results using the Nucleus CI24M implant to record the electrically evoked compound action potential. Ear and Hearing, 20, 45-59.
2. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2005). Audiologists providing clinical services via telepractice. ASHA Supplement, 25, 1-8.
3. Bench, J., Kowal, A., & Bamford, J. (1979). The BKB (Bamford-Kowal-Bench) sentence lists for partially-hearing children. British Journal of Audiology, 13, 108-112.
4. Beutelmann, R., & Brand, T. (2006). Prediction of speech intelligibility in spatial noise and reverberation for normalhearing and hearing-impaired listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 120, 331-342.
5. ® Freedom™ cochlear implant via machine intelligence. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 40, 15-28.
6. Choi, J. M., Lee, H. B., Park, C. S., Oh, S. H., & Park, K. S. (2007). PC-based tele-audiometry. Telemedicine and e-Health, 13, 501-508.
7. Denton, D. R., & Gladstone, V. S. (2005). Ethical and legal issues related to telepractice. Seminars in Hearing, 26, 43-52.
8. Franck, K., Pengelly, M., & Zerfoss, S. (2006). Telemedicine offers remote cochlear implant programming. Volta Voices, 13, 16-19.
9. Givens, G. D., & Elangovan, S. (2003). Internet applications to tele-audiology-"Nothin' but Net." American Journal of Audiology, 12, 59-65.
10. International Organization for Standardization. (1997). Acoustics: Measurement of the reverberation time of rooms with reference to other acoustic parameters [ISO 3382]. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
11. Krumm, M., Huffman, T., Dick, K., & Klich, R. (2008). Telemedicine for audiology screening of infants. Journal of Telemed Telecare, 14, 102-104.
12. Krumm, M., Ribera, J., & Klich, R. (2007). Providing basic hearing tests using remote computing technology. Journal of Telemed Telecare, 13, 406-410.
13. McElveen, J. T., Blackburn, E. L., Green, J. D., McLear, P. W., Thimsen, D. J., & Wilson, B. S. (2010). Remote programming of cochlear implants: A telecommunications model. Otology & Neurotology, 31, 1035-1040.
14. Nilsson, M., Soli, S. D., & Sullivan, J. A. (1994). Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95, 1085-1099.
15. Peterson, G. E., & Lehiste, I. (1962). Revised CNC lists for auditory tests. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 27, 62-70.
16. Poissant, S. F., Whitmal, N. A., III, & Freyman, R. L. (2006). Effects of reverberation and masking on speech intelligibility in cochlear implant simulations. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 1606-1615.
17. Ramos, A., Rodríguez, C., Martinez-Beneyto, P., Perez, D., Gault, A., Falcon, J. C., & Boyle, P. (2009). Use of telemedicine in the remote programming of cochlear implants. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 129, 533-540.
18. Ribera, J. E. (2005). Interjudge reliability and validation of telehealth applications of the Hearing in Noise Test. Seminars in Hearing, 26, 13-18.
19. Shapiro, W. H., Huang, T., Shaw, T., Roland, T., & Lalwani, A. K. (2008). Remote intraoperative monitoring during cochlear implant surgery is feasible and efficient. Otology & Neurotology, 29, 495-498.
20. Towers, A. D., Pisa, J., Froelich, T. M., & Krumm, M. (2005). The reliability of click-evoked and frequency-specific auditory brainstem response testing using telehealth technology. Seminars in Hearing, 26, 26-34.
21. van Dijk, B., Botros, A. M., Battmer, R., Begall, K., Dillier, N., Hey, M.,and Offeciers, E. (2007). Clinical results of AutoNRTi, a completely automatic ECAP recording system for cochlear implants. Ear and Hearing, 28, 558-570.
22. Wesarg, T., Wasowski, A., Skarzynski, H., Ramos, A., Gonzalez, J. C. F., Kyriafinis, G.,and Laszig R. (2010). Remote fitting in Nucleus cochlear implant recipients. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 130, 1379-1388.