Learning piano melodies in visuo-motor or audio-motor training conditions and the neural correlates of their cross-modal transfer

NeuroImage

Volumn 63, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 966-978

  Engel, Annerose ^a,b,c   Bangert, Marc ^c,d   Horbank, David ^c   Hijmans, Brenda S ^a   Wilkens, Katharina ^c   Keller, Peter E ^c,e   Keysers, Christian ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE FOR NEUROSCIENCE   (Netherlands)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

^d DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^e WESTERN SYDNEY UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Cross modal transfer; Human fMRI; Piano learning; Rolandic operculum

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN REGION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS MODAL PERCEPTION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; FEMALE; FRONTAL OPERCULUM; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; MALE; MUSICIAN; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RESPONSE TIME; SENSORIMOTOR CORTEX; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL MEMORY; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; FEMALE; FINGERS; HUMANS; LEARNING; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MOVEMENT; MUSIC; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84866173061     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.038     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Bangert M., Altenmüller E. Mapping perception to action in piano practice: a longitudinal DC-EEG study. BMC Neurosci. 2003, 4:26.
2. Bangert M., Häusler U., Altenmüller E. On practice: how the brain connects piano keys and piano sounds. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2001, 930:425-428.
3. Bangert M., Peschel T., Schlaug G., Rotte M., Drescher D., Hinrichs H., Heinze H.J., Altenmüller E. Shared networks for auditory and motor processing in professional pianists: evidence from fMRI conjunction. NeuroImage 2006, 30:917-926.
4. Brass M., Bekkering H., Wohlschläger A., Prinz W. Compatibility between observed and executed finger movements: comparing symbolic, spatial, and imitative cues. Brain Cogn. 2000, 44:124-143.
5. Brass M., Bekkering H., Prinz W. Movement observation affects movement execution in a simple response task. Acta Psychol. (Amst) 2001, 106:3-22.
6. Brodsky W., Kessler Y., Rubinstein B.S., Ginsborg J., Henik A. The mental representation of music notation: notational audiation. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2008, 34:427-445.
7. Brown S., Ingham R.J., Ingham J.C., Laird A.R., Fox P.T. Stuttered and fluent speech production: an ALE meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2005, 25:105-117.
8. Buccino G., Lui F., Canessa N., Pastteri I., Lagravinese G., Benuzzi F., Porro C.A., Rizzolatti G. Neural circuits involved in the recognition of actions performed by nonconspecifics: An fMRI study. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2004, 16:114-126.
9. Bushnell E.W., Baxt C. Children's haptic and cross-modal recognition with familiar and unfamiliar objects. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1999, 25:1867-1881.
10. Calvo-Merino B., Glaser D.E., Grezes J., Passingham R.E., Haggard P. Action observation and acquired motor skills: an FMRI study with expert dancers. Cereb. Cortex 2005, 15:1243-1249.
11. Calvo-Merino B., Grezes J., Glaser D.E., Passingham R.E., Haggard P. Seeing or doing? Influence of visual and motor familiarity in action observation. Curr. Biol. 2006, 16:1905-1910.
12. Casile A., Giese M.A. Nonvisual motor training influences biological motion perception. Curr. Biol. 2006, 16:69-74.
13. Cross E.S., Hamilton A.F., Grafton S.T. Building a motor simulation de novo: observation of dance by dancers. NeuroImage 2006, 31:1257-1267.
14. Davis M.H. Measuring individual differences in empathy: evidence for a multidimensional approach. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1983, 44:113-126.
15. Del Giudice M., Manera V., Keysers C. Programmed to learn? The ontogeny of mirror neurons. Dev. Sci. 2009, 12:350-363.
16. Eldrige M., Saltzman E., Lahav A. Seeing what you hear: visual feedback improves pitch recognition. J. Cogn. Psychol. 2010, 22:1078-1091.
17. Fink G.R., Frackowiak R.S., Pietrzyk U., Passingham R.E. Multiple nonprimary motor areas in the human cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 1997, 77:2164-2174.
18. Fleming, N.D., Mills, C., 1992. Not another inventory, rather a catalyst for reflection. To Improve the Academy 11, 137.
19. Gazzola V., Aziz-Zadeh L., Keysers C. Empathy and the somatotopic auditory mirror system in humans. Curr. Biol. 2006, 16:1824-1829.
20. Gazzola V., Rizzolatti G., Wicker B., Keysers C. The anthropomorphic brain: the mirror neuron system responds to human and robotic actions. NeuroImage 2007, 35:1674-1684.
21. Grahn J.A., Brett M. Rhythm and beat perception in motor areas of the brain. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2007, 19:893-906.
22. Grahn J.A., Rowe J.B. Feeling the beat: premotor and striatal interactions in musicians and nonmusicians during beat perception. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29:7540-7548.
23. Halpern A.R., Zatorre R.J. When that tune runs through your head: a PET investigation of auditory imagery for familiar melodies. Cereb. Cortex 1999, 9:697-704.
24. Hasegawa T., Matsuki K., Ueno T., Maeda Y., Matsue Y., Konishi Y., Sadato N. Learned audio-visual cross-modal associations in observed piano playing activate the left planum temporale. An fMRI study. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 2004, 20:510-518.
25. Haslinger B., Erhard P., Altenmüller E., Schroeder U., Boecker H., Ceballos-Baumann A.O. Transmodal sensorimotor networks during action observation in professional pianists. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2005, 17:282-293.
26. Haueisen J., Knösche T.R. Involuntary motor activity in pianists evoked by music perception. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2001, 13:786-792.
27. Hecht H., Vogt S., Prinz W. Motor learning enhances perceptual judgment: a case for action-perception transfer. Psychol. Res. 2001, 65:3-14.
28. Hommel B., Müsseler J., Aschersleben G., Prinz W. The theory of event coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. Behav. Brain Sci. 2001, 24:849-878. discussion 878-937.
29. Iacoboni M., Woods R.P., Brass M., Bekkering H., Mazziotta J.C., Rizzolatti G. Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. Science 1999, 286:2526-2528.
30. Kato M., Konishi Y. Auditory dominance in the error correction process: a synchronized tapping study. Brain Res. 2006, 1084:115-122.
31. Keysers C., Perrett D.I. Demystifying social cognition: a Hebbian perspective. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2004, 8:501-507.
32. Koelsch S., Fritz T., Cramon D.Y.V., Müller K., Friederici A.D. Investigating emotion with music: an fMRI study. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2006, 27:239-250.
33. Lacey S., Campbell C. Mental representation in visual/haptic crossmodal memory: evidence from interference effects. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. (Colchester) 2006, 59:361-376.
34. Lahav A., Saltzman E., Schlaug G. Action representation of sound: audiomotor recognition network while listening to newly acquired actions. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27:308-314.
35. Lotze M., Scheler G., Tan H.R., Braun C., Birbaumer N. The musician's brain: functional imaging of amateurs and professionals during performance and imagery. NeuroImage 2003, 20:1817-1829.
36. Mutschler I., Schulze-Bonhage A., Glauche V., Demandt E., Speck O., Ball T. A rapid sound-action association effect in human insular cortex. PLoS One 2007, 2:e259.
37. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9:97-113.
38. Platel H., Price C., Baron J.C., Wise R., Lambert J., Frackowiak R.S., Lechevalier B., Eustache F. The structural components of music perception. A functional anatomical study. Brain 1997, 120(Pt 2):229-243.
39. Reithler J., van Mier H.I., Peters J.C., Goebel R. Nonvisual motor learning influences abstract action observation. Curr. Biol. 2007, 17:1201-1207.
40. Repp B.H., Penel A. Auditory dominance in temporal processing: new evidence from synchronization with simultaneous visual and auditory sequences. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2002, 28:1085-1099.
41. Repp B.H., Penel A. Rhythmic movement is attracted more strongly to auditory than to visual rhythms. Psychol. Res. 2004, 68:252-270.
42. Rizzolatti G., Craighero L. The mirror-neuron system. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2004, 27:169-192.
43. Roland P.E., Gulyas B. Visual imagery and visual representation. Trends Neurosci. 1994, 17:281-287. discussion 294-287.
44. Rossion B., Schiltz C., Robaye L., Pirenne D., Crommelinck M. How does the brain discriminate familiar and unfamiliar faces?: A PET study of face categorical perception. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2001, 13:1019-1034.
45. Schubotz R.I. Prediction of external events with our motor system: towards a new framework. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2007, 11:211-218.
46. Schubotz R.I., von Cramon D.Y. Functional-anatomical concepts of human premotor cortex: evidence from fMRI and PET studies. NeuroImage 2003, 20(Suppl. 1):S120-S131.
47. Witt S.T., Laird A.R., Meyerand M.E. Functional neuroimaging correlates of finger-tapping task variations: an ALE meta-analysis. NeuroImage 2008, 42:343-356.
48. Zatorre R.J., Halpern A.R. Mental concerts: musical imagery and auditory cortex. Neuron 2005, 47:9-12.