Canadian family physicians' decision to collaborate: Age, period and cohort effects

Social Science and Medicine

Volumn 75, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 1811-1819

  Sarma, Sisira ^a   Devlin, Rose Anne ^b   Thind, Amardeep ^a   Chu, Man Kee ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Canada; Collaboration; Inter professional team; Multivariate probit; Primary care

Indexed keywords

HEALTH CARE; HEALTH SERVICES; HEALTH WORKER; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS;

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; CANADA; COHORT ANALYSIS; COOPERATION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL FEE; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; SEX DIFFERENCE;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; CANADA; COHORT STUDIES; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSICIANS, FAMILY; TIME FACTORS;

CANADA;

EID: 84866158395     PISSN: 02779536     EISSN: 18735347     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.07.028     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Barrett J., Curran V., Glynn L., Godwin M. CHSRF synthesis: Interprofessional collaboration and quality primary healthcare 2007, Canadian Health Services Research Foundation, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
2. Berendsen A., Benneker W., Meyboom-de Jong B., Klazinga N., Schuling J. Motives and preferences of general practitioners for new collaboration models with medical specialists: a qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research 2007, 7(4).
3. Berendsen A., Benneker W., Schuling J., Rijkers-Koorn N., Slaets J., Meyboom-de Jong B. Collaboration with general practitioners: preferences of medical specialists - a qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research 2006, 6(155).
4. Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) Physicians in Canada: The status of alternative payment programs, 2005-2006 2008, Canadian Institute for Health Information, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
5. Cappellari L., Jenkins S. Multivariate probit regression using simulated maximum likelihood. The Stata Journal 2003, 3(3):278-294.
6. College of Family Physicians of Canada (2009). Patient-centred primary care in Canada: Bring it on home, Discussion Paper, Ottawa, ON.
7. D'amour D., Oandasan I. Interprofessionality as the field of interprofessional practice and interprofessional education: an emerging concept. Journal of Interprofessional Care 2005, 19(2):8-20.
8. Delva D., Tomalty L., Macrae K., Payne P., Plain E., Rowe W. A new model for collaborative continuing professional development. Journal of Interprofessional Care 2008, 22(S1):91-100.
9. Enhancing Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Primary Health Care (EICP) Initiative Primary health care: A framework that fits 2006, http://www.eicp.ca/en/.
10. Ezekowitz J., van Walraven C., McAlister F., Armstrong P., Kaul P. Impact of specialist follow-up in outpatients with congestive heart failure. Canadian Medical Association Journal 2005, 172(2):189-194.
11. Gene-Badia J., Ascaso C., Escaramis-Babiano G., Catalan-Ramos A., Pujol-Ribera E., Sampietro-Colom L. Population and primary health-care team characteristics explain the quality of the service. Health Policy 2008, 86:335-344.
12. Grumbach K., Bodenheimer T. Can health care teams improve primary care practice?. Journal of American Medical Association 2004, 291(10):1246-1251.
13. Health Council Canada (HCC) Teams in action: Primary health care teams for Canadians 2009, http://www.healthcouncilcanada.ca.
14. Herbert C., Bainbridge L., Bickford J., Baptiste S., Brajtman S., Dryden T., et al. Factors that influence engagement in collaborative practice. Canadian Family Physician 2007, 53(8):1318-1325.
15. Howard M., Goertzen J., Hutchison B., Kaczorowski J., Morris K. Patient satisfaction with care for urgent health problems: a survey of family practice patients. Annals of Family Medicine 2007, 5(5):419-424.
16. Hutchison B., Levesque J., Strumpf E., Coyle N. Primary health care in Canada: systems in motion. Milbank Quarterly 2011, 89(2):256-288.
17. Khan S., McIntosh C., Sanmartin C., Watson D., Leeb K. Primary health care teams and their impact on processes and outcomes of care 2008, Health Information and Research Division, Statistics Canada, 82-622-X No. 002.
18. Kirby M. The health of Canadians-The federal role. Recommendations for reform October 2002, Standing Senate Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
19. Kvarnstrom S. Difficulties in collaboration: a critical incident study of interprofessional healthcare teamwork. Journal of Interprofessional Care 2008, 22(2):191-203.
20. Li, J., Hurley, J., DeCicca, P., & Buckley, G. (2011). Physician response to pay-for-performance - evidence from a natural experiment. NBER Working Paper No. 16909.
21. Marchildon G.P. Health systems in transition: Canada 2005, WHO Regional Office for Europe on Behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, Copenhagen.
22. Mian O., Koren I., Rukholm E. Nurse practitioners in Ontario primary healthcare: referral patterns and collaboration with other healthcare professionals. Journal of Interprofessional Care 2012, 26(3):232-239.
23. Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MOHLTC) Family health teams 2002, http://www.health.gov.on.ca/transformation/fht/fht_mn.html.
24. Oandasan I., Conn L., Lingard L., Karim A., Jakubovicz D., Whitehead C., et al. The impact of space and time on interprofessional teamwork in Canadian primary health care settings: implications for health care reform. Primary Health Care Research and Development 2009, 10:151-162.
25. Pringle D., Levitt C., Horsburgh M., Wilson R., Whittaker M. Interdisciplinary collaboration and primary health care reform: statement from the Ontario chairs of family medicine and the council of Ontario University programs in nursing. Canadian Family Physician 2000, 46:763-765.
26. Reither E., Hauser R., Yang Y. Do birth cohorts matter? Age-period-cohort analyses of the obesity epidemic in the United States. Social Science & Medicine 2009, 69(10):1439-1448.
27. Romanow R. Building on values: The future of health care in Canada: Final report November 2002, Commission on the Future of Health Care, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
28. Rosser W., Colwill J., Kasperski J., Wilson L. Progress of Ontario's family health team model: a patient-centered medical home. Annals of Family Medicine 2011, 9(2):165-171.
29. Rourke J. Increasing the number of rural physicians. Canadian Medical Association Journal 2008, 178(3):322-324.
30. Sarma S., Thind A., Chu M.K. Do new cohorts of family physicians work less compared to their older predecessors? The evidence from Canada. Social Science & Medicine 2011, 72(12):2049-2058.
31. Snijders T., Bosker R. Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling 1999, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
32. Taylor K., Oberle M., Crutcher R., Norton P. Promoting health in type 2 diabetes: nurse-physician collaboration in primary care. Biological Research for Nursing 2005, 6(3):207-215.
33. Tourigny A., Aubin M., Haggerty J., Bonin L., Morin D., Reinharz D., et al. Patients' perceptions of the quality of care after primary care reform. Canadian Family Physician 2010, 56(7):e273-e282.
34. Yang Y., Land K. A mixed models approach to the age-period-cohort analysis of repeated cross-section surveys, with an application to data on trends in verbal test scores. Sociological Methodology 2006, 36:75-97.
35. Yang Y., Land K. Age-period-cohort analysis of repeated cross-section surveys: fixed or random effects?. Sociological Methods and Research 2008, 36(3):297-326.