MM-ISMSA: An ultrafast and accurate scoring function for protein-protein docking

Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation

Volumn 8, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 3395-3408

  Klett, Javier ^a   Núñez Salgado, Alfonso ^a   Dos Santos, Helena G ^a   Cortés Cabrera, Álvaro ^a,b   Perona, Almudena ^a,c   Gil Redondo, Rubén ^a,c   Abia, David ^a   Gago, Federico ^b   Morreale, Antonio ^a  

^a CENTRO DE BIOLOGÍA MOLECULAR SEVERO OCHOA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALCALÁ   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84866151593     PISSN: 15499618     EISSN: 15499626     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ct300497z     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Jorgensen, W. L. The many roles of computation in drug discovery Science 2004, 303, 1813-1818
2. Kortemme, T.; Joachimiak, L. A.; Bullock, A. N.; Schuler, A. D.; Stoddard, B. L.; Baker, D. Computational redesign of protein-protein interaction specificity Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2004, 11, 371-379
3. Halperin, I.; Ma, B.; Wolfson, H.; Nussinov, R. Principles of docking: An overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions Proteins 2002, 47, 409-443
4. Ripphausen, P.; Nisius, B.; Peltason, L.; Bajorath, J. Quo vadis, virtual screening? A comprehensive survey of prospective applications J. Med. Chem. 2010, 53, 8461-8467
5. Ben-Shimon, A.; Eisenstein, M. Computational mapping of anchoring spots on protein surfaces J. Mol. Biol. 2010, 402, 259-277
6. McCammon, J. A.; Gelin, B. R.; Karplus, M. Dynamics of folded proteins Nature 1977, 267, 585-590
7. Jorgensen, W. L. Efficient drug lead discovery and optimization Acc. Chem. Res. 2009, 42, 724-733
8. Shaw, D. E.; Deneroff, M. M.; Dror, R. O.; Kuskin, J. S.; Larson, R. H.; Salmon, J. K.; Young, C.; Batson, B.; Bowers, K. J.; Chao, J. C.; Eastwood, M. P.; Gagliardo, J.; Grossman, J. P.; Ho, C. R.; Ierardi, D. J.; Kolossvry, I.; Klepeis, J. L.; Layman, T.; McLeavey, C.; Moraes, M. A.; Mueller, R.; Priest, E. C.; Shan, Y.; Spengler, J.; Theobald, M.; Towles, B.; Wang, S. C. Anton, a special-purpose machine for molecular dynamics simulation SIGARCH Comput. Archit. News 2007, 35, 1-12
9. Top 500 Supercomputer sites. http://www.top500.org/ (accessed July 20, 2012).
10. Lindorff-Larsen, K.; Piana, S.; Dror, R. O.; Shaw, D. E. How fast-folding proteins fold Science 2011, 334, 517-520
11. Kruse, A. C.; Hu, J.; Pan, A. C.; Arlow, D. H.; Rosenbaum, D. M.; Rosemond, E.; Green, H. F.; Liu, T.; Chae, P. S.; Dror, R. O.; Shaw, D. E.; Weis, W. I.; Wess, J.; Kobilka, B. K. Structure and dynamics of the M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor Nature 2012, 482, 552-556
12. Shan, Y.; Kim, E. T.; Eastwood, M. P.; Dror, R. O.; Seeliger, M. A.; Shaw, D. E. How does a drug molecule find its target binding site? J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 9181-9183
13. Orozco, M.; Luque, F. J. Theoretical Methods for the Description of the Solvent Effect in Biomolecular Systems Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 4187-4226
14. Roux, B.; Simonson, T. Implicit solvent models Biophys. Chem. 1999, 78, 1-20
15. Honig, B.; Nicholls, A. Classical electrostatics in biology and chemistry Science 1995, 268, 1144-1149
16. Still, W. C.; Tempczyk, A.; Hawley, R. C.; Hendrickson, T. Semianalytical treatment of solvation for molecular mechanics and dynamics J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 6127-6129
17. Kuhlman, B.; Baker, D. Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2000, 97, 10383-10388
18. Yin, S.; Biedermannova, L.; Vondrasek, J.; Dokholyan, N. V. MedusaScore: an accurate force field-based scoring function for virtual drug screening J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2008, 48, 1656-1662
19. Morreale, A.; Gil-Redondo, R.; Ortiz, A. R. A new implicit solvent model for protein-ligand docking Proteins 2007, 67, 606-616
20. Case, D. A.; Cheatham, T. E., 3rd; Darden, T.; Gohlke, H.; Luo, R.; Merz, K. M., Jr.; Onufriev, A.; Simmerling, C.; Wang, B.; Woods, R. J. The Amber biomolecular simulation programs J. Comput. Chem. 2005, 26, 1668-1688
21. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, version 1.1r2pre; Schrödinger, LLC: Portland, OR, 2008.
22. Gilson, M. K.; Zhou, H.-X. Calculation of Protein-Ligand Binding Affinities Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 2007, 36, 21-42
23. Aqvist, J.; Medina, C.; Samuelsson, J. E. A new method for predicting binding affinity in computer-aided drug design Protein Eng. 1994, 7, 385-391
24. Kollman, P. A.; Massova, I.; Reyes, C.; Kuhn, B.; Huo, S.; Chong, L.; Lee, M.; Lee, T.; Duan, Y.; Wang, W.; Donini, O.; Cieplak, P.; Srinivasan, J.; Case, D. A.; Cheatham, T. E., 3rd. Calculating structures and free energies of complex molecules: combining molecular mechanics and continuum models Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 889-897
25. Gilson, M. K.; Honig, B. Calculation of the total electrostatic energy of a macromolecular system: solvation energies, binding energies, and conformational analysis Proteins 1988, 4, 7-18
26. Zhou, H. X.; Gilson, M. K. Theory of free energy and entropy in noncovalent binding Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 4092-4107
27. Warwicker, J.; Watson, H. C. Calculation of the electric potential in the active site cleft due to α-helix dipoles J. Mol. Biol. 1982, 157, 671-679
28. Baker, N.; Holst, M.; Wang, F. Adaptive multilevel finite element solution of the Poisson-Boltzmann equation II. Refinement at solvent-accessible surfaces in biomolecular systems J. Comput. Chem. 2000, 21, 1343-1352
29. Rashin, A. A.; Namboodiri, K. A simple method for the calculation of hydration enthalpies of polar molecules with arbitrary shapes J. Phys. Chem. 1987, 91, 6003-6012
30. Baker, N. A.; Sept, D.; Joseph, S.; Holst, M. J.; McCammon, J. A. Electrostatics of nanosystems: Application to microtubules and the ribosome Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2001, 98, 10037-10041
31. Mehler, E. L., The Lorentz-Debye-Sack Theory and Dielectric Screening of Electrostatic Effects in Proteins and Nucleic Acids. In Molecular Electrostatic Potential: Concepts and Applications; Murray, J. S.; Sen, K., Eds.; Elsevier Science: Amsterdam, 1996; Vol. 3, pp 371-405.
32. Hassan, S. A.; Guarnieri, F.; Mehler, E. L. A General Treatment of Solvent Effects Based on Screened Coulomb Potentials J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 6478-6489
33. Hassan, S. A.; Mehler, E. L.; Zhang, D.; Weinstein, H. Molecular dynamics simulations of peptides and proteins with a continuum electrostatic model based on screened Coulomb potentials Proteins 2003, 51, 109-125
34. Brooks, B. R.; Bruccoleri, R. E.; Olafson, B. D.; States, D. J.; Swaminathan, S.; Karplus, M. CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations J. Comput. Chem. 1983, 4, 187-217
35. Luque, F. J.; Curutchet, C.; Munoz-Muriedas, J.; Bidon-Chanal, A.; Soteras, I.; Morreale, A.; Gelpi, J. L.; Orozco, M. Continuum solvation models: Dissecting the free energy of solvation Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2003, 5, 3827-3836
36. Morreale, A.; de la Cruz, X.; Meyer, T.; Gelpi, J. L.; Luque, F. J.; Orozco, M. Partition of protein solvation into group contributions from molecular dynamics simulations Proteins 2005, 58, 101-109
37. Duan, Y.; Wu, C.; Chowdhury, S.; Lee, M. C.; Xiong, G.; Zhang, W.; Yang, R.; Cieplak, P.; Luo, R.; Lee, T.; Caldwell, J.; Wang, J.; Kollman, P. A point-charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed-phase quantum mechanical calculations J. Comput. Chem. 2003, 24, 1999-2012
38. Lee, M. C.; Duan, Y. Distinguish protein decoys by using a scoring function based on a new AMBER force field, short molecular dynamics simulations, and the generalized born solvent model Proteins 2004, 55, 620-634
39. Weiser, J.; Shenkin, P. S.; Still, W. C. Approximate atomic surfaces from linear combinations of pairwise overlaps (LCPO) J. Comput. Chem. 1999, 20, 217-230
40. Tsui, V.; Case, D. A. Theory and applications of the generalized born solvation model in macromolecular simulations Biopolymers 2000, 56, 275-291
41. Wallace, A. C.; Laskowski, R. A.; Thornton, J. M. LIGPLOT: a program to generate schematic diagrams of protein-ligand interactions Protein Eng. 1995, 8, 127-134
42. Laskowski, R. A. PDBsum new things Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, D355-359
43. McDonald, I. K.; Thornton, J. M. Satisfying hydrogen bonding potential in proteins J. Mol. Biol. 1994, 238, 777-793
44. Garzon, J. I.; Lopez-Blanco, J. R.; Pons, C.; Kovacs, J.; Abagyan, R.; Fernandez-Recio, J.; Chacon, P. FRODOCK: a new approach for fast rotational protein-protein docking Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 2544-2551
45. Gordon, J. C.; Myers, J. B.; Folta, T.; Shoja, V.; Heath, L. S.; Onufriev, A. H++: a server for estimating pKas and adding missing hydrogens to macromolecules Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33, W368-371
46. Comeau, S. R.; Gatchell, D. W.; Vajda, S.; Camacho, C. J. ClusPro: a fully automated algorithm for protein-protein docking Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, W96-99
47. McLachlan, A. Rapid comparison of protein structures Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A 1982, 38, 871-873
48. Martin, A. C. R.; Porter, C. T. ProFit, version 3.1; University College London: London, 2009.
49. Lill, M.; Danielson, M. Computer-aided drug design platform using PyMOL J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2011, 25, 13-19
50. Steinkellner, G.; Rader, R.; Thallinger, G. G.; Kratky, C.; Gruber, K. VASCo: computation and visualization of annotated protein surface contacts BMC Bioinf. 2009, 10, 32
51. Humphrey, W.; Dalke, A.; Schulten, K. VMD: visual molecular dynamics J. Mol. Graph. 1996, 14 (33-38) 27-38
52. Camacho, C. J.; Zhang, C. FastContact: rapid estimate of contact and binding free energies Bioinformatics 2005, 21, 2534-2536
53. Assi, S. A.; Tanaka, T.; Rabbitts, T. H.; Fernandez-Fuentes, N. PCRPi: Presaging Critical Residues in Protein interfaces, a new computational tool to chart hot spots in protein interfaces Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38, e86
54. Vangone, A.; Spinelli, R.; Scarano, V.; Cavallo, L.; Oliva, R. COCOMAPS: a web application to analyze and visualize contacts at the interface of biomolecular complexes Bioinformatics 2011, 27, 2915-2916
55. Knapp, B.; Schreiner, W. Graphical user interfaces for molecular dynamics-quo vadis? Bioinform. Biol. Insights 2009, 3, 103-107