Neonatal desensitization does not universally prevent xenograft rejection

Nature Methods

Volumn 9, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 856-858

  Janowski, Miroslaw ^a,b,c   Jablonska, Anna ^c   Kozlowska, Hanna ^c   Orukari, Inema ^a,b   Bernard, Segun ^a,b   Bulte, Jeff Wm ^a,b,d,e   Lukomska, Barbara ^c   Walczak, Piotr ^a,b  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Institute for Cell Engineering   (United States)

^c MOSSAKOWSKI MEDICAL RESEARCH CENTRE   (Poland)

^d JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e Johns Hopkins University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUNU PROTEIN; LUCIFERASE; PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; BIOLUMINESCENCE; BRAIN CELL; CELL IMMORTALIZATION; CELL TRANSPLANTATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DESENSITIZATION; FETUS; GRAFT RECIPIENT; GRAFT REJECTION; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HETEROGRAFT REACTION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; IMMUNOLOGICAL TOLERANCE; LETTER; MOUSE; NEURAL STEM CELL; NEURAL STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ANIMALS; BRAIN; DESENSITIZATION, IMMUNOLOGIC; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMANS; NEURONS; STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION;

EID: 84866125413     PISSN: 15487091     EISSN: 15487105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.2146     Document Type: Letter

References (6)

1. Brundin, P. et al. Exp. Brain Res. 70, 192-208 (1988).
2. Walczak, P. et al. J. Neurosci. Res. 76, 244-254 (2004).
3. Liesz, A. et al. Brain 134, 704-720 (2011).
4. Kelly, C.M. Nat. Methods 6, 271-273 (2009).
5. Shen, Z., Mohiuddin, M., Goldstein, C., Yokoyama, H. & DiSesa, V.J. Transplant. Proc. 28, 719-720 (1996).
6. Butler, P.E., Lee, W.P., van de Water, A.P. & Randolph, M.A. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 105, 2424-2430 (2000).