Constitutional principles

Boston University Law Review

Volumn 92, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 1237-1243

  Lyons, David ^a  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84866124476     PISSN: 00068047     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. JACK M. BALKIN, LIVING ORIGINALISM (2011).
2. See, e.g., JOHN RAWLS, A THEORY OF JUSTICE 9 (1971).
3. See RONALD DWORKIN, LAW'S EMPIRE 45-86 (1986).
4. See Lyons, Original Intent and Legal Interpretation, 24 AUSTL. J. LEGAL PHIL. 1 (1999).
5. Dworkin suggests that there is such a convention regarding statutory construction, in A MATTER OF PRINCIPLE 320-22 (1985).
6. 347 U. S. 483 (1954).
7. Pub. L. No. 88-352, 78 Stat. 252
8. (codified as amended at 28 U. S. C. § 1447 (2006)
9. and 42 U. S. C. §§ 1971, 1975a-1975d, 2000a-2000h-6 (2006)).
10. Pub. L. No. 89-110, 79 Stat. 437
11. (codified as amended at 42 U. S. C. §§ 1973-1973bb-1).
12. See DAVID LYONS, MORAL ASPECTS OF LEGAL THEORY: ESSAYS ON LAW, JUSTICE, AND POLITICAL RESPONSIBILITY 194-96 (1993).