The effect of coil type and navigation on the reliability of transcranial magnetic stimulation

IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 617-625

  Fleming, Melanie K ^a   Sorinola, Isaac O ^b   Newham, Di J ^a   Roberts Lewis, Sarah F ^a   Bergmann, Jeroen H M ^c  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Coil type; navigation; reliability; three dimensional (3D) tracking; transcranial magnetic stimulation

Indexed keywords

COIL SYSTEMS; COIL TYPE; FIGURE-OF-EIGHT COILS; INTRACLASS CORRELATION COEFFICIENTS; MOTOR CORTEX; MOTOR EVOKED POTENTIALS; NAVIGATION DEVICES; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION;

FIBER OPTIC SENSORS; FUNCTIONAL ELECTRIC STIMULATION; RELIABILITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

NAVIGATION;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; EVOKED MUSCLE RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; TRANSDUCER;

ADULT; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; EVOKED POTENTIALS, MOTOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; TRANSDUCERS;

EID: 84866108609     PISSN: 15344320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2012.2202692     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. K.M. Rösler,C.W.Hess,R.Heckmann, andH.P.Ludin, "Significance of shape and size of the stimulating coil in magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex," Neuosci. Lett., vol. 100, no. 1-3, pp. 347-352, May 1989. (Pubitemid 19128201)
2. K. R. Mills, S. J. Boniface, and M. Schubert, "Magnetic brain stimulation with a double coil: The importance of coil orientation," Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 17-21, Feb. 1992.
3. U. Herwig et al., "The navigation of transcranial magnetic stimulation," Psychiatry Res., vol. 108, no. 2, pp. 123-131, Nov. 30, 2001. (Pubitemid 34003574)
4. P. Julkunen et al., "Comparison of navigated and non-navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation for motor cortex mapping, motor threshold and motor evoked potentials," Neuroimage, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 790-795, Feb. 1, 2009.
5. R. Sparing et al., "Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the challenge of coil placement: A comparison of conventional and stereotaxic neuronavigational strategies," Hum. BrainMapp., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 82-96, Jan. 2008.
6. T. J. Carroll, S. Riek, and R. G. Carson, "Reliability of the inputoutput properties of the cortico-spinal pathway obtained from transcranial magnetic and electrical stimulation," J. Neurosci. Methods, vol. 112, no. 2, pp. 193-202, Dec. 15, 2001. (Pubitemid 33051119)
7. S. L. Wolf et al., "Intra-subject reliability of parameters contributing to maps generated by transcranial magnetic stimulation in able-bodied adults," Clin. Neurophysiol., vol. 115, no. 8, pp. 1740-1747, Aug. 2004. (Pubitemid 38952941)
8. R. A. Badawy et al., "The routine circular coil is reliable in paired-TMS studies," Clin. Neurophysiol., vol. 122, no. 4, pp. 784-788, Apr. 2011.
9. M. P.Malcolm et al., "Reliability of motor cortex transcranialmagnetic stimulation in four muscle representations," Clin. Neurophysiol., vol. 117, no. 5, pp. 1037-1046, May 2006.
10. T. Kujirai et al., "Corticocortical inhibition in human motor cortex," J. Physiol., vol. 471, pp. 501-519, Nov. 1993. (Pubitemid 23345592)
11. B. Boroojerdi et al., "Reproducibility of intracortical inhibition and facilitation using the paired-pulse paradigm," Muscle Nerve, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 1594-1597, Oct. 2000.
12. M. Orth, A. H. Snijders, and J. C. Rothwell, "The variability of intracortical inhibition and facilitation," Clin. Neurophysiol., vol. 114, no. 12, pp. 2362-2369, Dec. 2003. (Pubitemid 37494933)
13. T. Shimizu et al., "Modulation of intracortical excitability for different muscles in the upper extremity: Paired magnetic stimulation study with focal versus non-focal coils," Clin. Neurophysiol., vol. 110, no. 3, pp. 575-581, Mar. 1999. (Pubitemid 29207508)
14. J. M. Bland and D. G. Altman, "Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement," Lancet, vol. 1, no. 8476, pp. 307-310, Feb. 8, 1986. (Pubitemid 16134762)
15. G. Rankin and M. Stokes, "Reliability of assessment tools in rehabilitation: An illustration of appropriate statistical analyses," Clin Rehabil, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 187-199, Jun. 1998. (Pubitemid 28339917)
16. L. G. Portney and M. P. Watkins, Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 2000.
17. V. E. Amassian, R. Q. Cracco, and P. J. Maccabee, "Focal stimulation of human cerebral cortex with the magnetic coil: A comparison with electrical stimulation," Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., vol. 74, no. 6, pp. 401-416, Nov.-Dec. 1989. (Pubitemid 20000335)
18. A. Freed et al., "Musical applications and design techniques for the gametrak tethered spatial position controller," in Proc. SMC Conf., 2009, pp. 1-6.
19. C. M. Stinear, M. K. Fleming, and W. D. Byblow, "Lateralization of unimanual and bimanual motor imagery," Brain Res., vol. 1095, no. 1, pp. 139-147, June 20, 2006. (Pubitemid 43884744)
20. P. E. Shrout and J. L. Fleiss, "Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability," Psychol. Bull., vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 420-428, Mar. 1979.
21. D. Rom, "A sequentially rejective test procedure based on a modified bonferroni inequality.," Biometrika, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 663-665, 1990.
22. V. D. Lazzaro et al., "The physiological basis of transcranial motor cortex stimulation in conscious humans," Clin. Neurophysiol., vol. 115, no. 2, pp. 255-266, Feb. 2004.
23. R. J. Fisher et al., "Two phases of intracortical inhibition revealed by transcranial magnetic threshold tracking," Exp. Brain Res., vol. 143, no. 2, pp. 240-248, Mar. 2002. (Pubitemid 34212260)
24. L. D. Gugino et al., "Transcranial magnetic stimulation coregistered with MRI:Acomparison of a guided versus blind stimulation technique and its effect on evoked compound muscle action potentials," Clin. Neurophysiol., vol. 112, no. 10, pp. 1781-1792, Oct. 2001. (Pubitemid 32831515)
25. N. H. Jung et al., "Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation does not decrease the variability of motor-evoked potentials," Brain Stimul., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 87-94, Apr. 2010.
26. W. G. Darling, S. L.Wolf, and A. J. Butler, "Variability ofmotor potentials evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation depends on muscle activation," Exp. Brain Res., vol. 174, no. 2, pp. 376-385, Sep. 2006. (Pubitemid 44421115)
27. L. Kiers et al., "Variability of motor potentials evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation," Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., vol. 89, no. 6, pp. 415-423, Dec. 1993. (Pubitemid 24024443)