ROCView: Prototype software for data collection in jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic analysis

British Journal of Radiology

Volumn 85, Issue 1017, 2012, Pages 1320-1326

  Thompson, John ^a,b   Hogg, P ^b   Thompson, S ^c   Manning, D ^b,c   Szczepura, K ^b  

^a FURNESS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SALFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DATA PROCESSING; DIAGNOSIS; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; RADIODIAGNOSIS; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; ROCVIEW; TRUE POSITIVE RESULT; WEB BROWSER;

ALGORITHMS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84866091332     PISSN: 00071285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/bjr/99497945     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Gur D, Rockette H, Bandos A. 'Binary' and 'non-binary' detection tasks: are current performance measures optimal? Acad Radiol 2007;14:871-6.
2. Manning D. Evaluation of diagnostic performance in radiography. Radiography 1998;4:49-60.
3. devchakraborty.com [homepage on the internet]. Philadelphia: Dev Chakraborty; 2011 [updated 2011; cited 4 November 2011]. Available from: http://www.devchakraborty.com/Historical%20Background.html
4. Chakraborty D. Analysis of location specific observer performance data: validated extensions of the jackknife freeresponse (JAFROC) method. Acad Radiol 2006;13:1187-93.
5. devchakraborty.com [homepage on the internet]. Philadelphia: Dev Chakraborty and Hong-Jun Yoon; 2011. JAFROC 4.0 user manual [updated 2010; cited 10 August 2011]. Available from: http://www.devchakraborty.com/ Receiver%20operating%20characteristic.pdf
6. Zarb F, Rainford L, McEntree M. Image quality assessment tools for optimisation of CT images. Radiography 2010;16:147-53.
7. Chakraborty D. Validation and statistical power comparison of methods for analysing free-response observer performance studies. Acad Radiol 2008;15:1554-66.
8. Chakraborty D, Hong-Jun Y, Mello-Thomas C. Spatial localization accuracy of radiologists in free-response studies: inferring perceptual FROC curves from mark-rating data. Acad Radiol 2007;14:4-18.
9. Obuchowski N. Reducing the number of reader interpretations in MRMC studies. Acad Radiol 2009;16:209-17.
10. Chakraborty D. How many readers and cases does one need to conduct an ROC study? Acad Radiol 2011;18:127-8.
11. Manning D, Leach J, Bunting S. A comparison of expert and novice performance in the detection of simulated pulmonary nodules. Radiography 2000;6:111-16.
12. Thompson J, Hogg P, Szczepura K, Tootell A, Sil J, Manning D. Determination of optimal CT exposure factors for lung lesions using an anthropomorphic chest phantom for SPECTCT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2010;37(Suppl. 2):S494.
13. Jacobs F, Zanca R, Oyen H, Bosmans J. Sara, an advanced software platform for human observer performance experiments. In: Proceedings of the XIVth Medical Image Perception Conference; 9-12 August 2011; Dublin, Ireland. Available from: http://home.comcast.net/, eakmips/update.htm (software available from: http://www.kuleuven.be/radiology/lucmfr/sara/index.html)
14. Håkansson M, Svensson S, Zachrisson S, Svalkvist A, Båth M, Månsson L. ViewDEX: an efficient and easy-to-use software for observer performance studies. Radiat Prot Dosim 2010;139:42-51. Software available from: http://helios.ifss.gu.se/viewdex/index-v3-slide0001.htm
15. devchakraborty.com [homepage on the internet]. Philadelphia: Dev Chakraborty; 2011. JAFROC 4.0.1 analysis software [updated 2011; cited 10 August 2011]. Available from http://www.devchakraborty.com/downloads.html
16. perception.radiology.uiowa.edu [homepage on the internet]. Iowa City, IA: The Medical Image Perception Laboratory; 2011. DBM-MRMC v. 2.3 [updated 2011; cited 10 August 2011]. Available from: http://perception.radiology.uiowa.edu/ Software/ReceiverOperatingCharacteristicROC/DBMMRMC/tabid/116/Default.aspx
17. devchakraborty.com [homepage on the internet]. Philadelphia: Dev Chakraborty; 2011. How to conduct a free-response study [updated 2011; cited 10 August 2011]. Available from: http://www.devchakraborty.com/HowToConduct.html
18. Deckard.mc.duke.edu [homepage on the internet]. Durham, NC: American Association of Physicists in Medicine; 2011. Online report no. 3: assessment of display performance for medical imaging systems [updated 2005; cited 10 August 2011]. Available from: http://deckard.mc.duke.edu/,samei/tg18-files/tg18.pdf
19. Fetterly K, Blume H, Flynn M, Samei E. Introduction to grayscale calibration and related aspects of medical imaging grade liquid crystal displays. J Digit Imaging 2008;21:193-207.
20. filezilla-project.org [homepage on the internet]. Aachen, Germany. Filezilla; 2011. Filezilla 3.5.0: The free FTP solution [updated 2011 May 22; cited 10 August 2011]. Available from: http://filezilla-project.org/
21. Gur D, Bandos A, Klym A, Cohen C, Hakim C, Hardesty L, et al. Agreement of the order of overall performance levels under different reading paradigms. Acad Radiol 2008;15:1567-73.
22. Park S, Goo J, Jo C-H. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve: practical review for radiologists. Korean J Radiol 2004;5:11-18.
23. Hadjiiski L, Chan H-P, Sahiner B, Helvie M, Roubidoux M. Quasi-continuous and discrete confidence rating scales for observer performance studies: effects on ROC analysis. Acad Radiol 2007;14:38-48.
24. Rockette H, Gur D. Selection of a rating scale in receiver operating characteristic studies: some remaining issues. Acad Radiol 2008;15:245-8.
25. devchakraborty.com [homepage on the internet]. Philadelphia: Dev Chakraborty; 2011. JAFROC 4.0 user manual [updated 2010; cited 10 August 2011]. Available from: http://www.devchakraborty.com/downloads.html
26. apache.org [homepage on the internet]. Los Angeles, CA: Apache Software Foundation; 2011. Apache HTTP server [updated 22 May 2011; cited 10 August 2011]. Available from: http://httpd.apache.org/