Induction and severe testing: Mill's sins or mayo's errors?

Error and Inference: Recent Exchanges on Experimental Reasoning, Reliability, and the Objectivity and Rationality of Science

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 170-188

  Achinstein, Peter ^a  

^a YESHIVA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84866068478     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511657528.007     Document Type: Chapter

References (8)

1. Achinstein, P. (2001), The Book of Evidence, Oxford University Press, New York.
2. Achinstein, P., ed. (2005), Scientific Evidence: Philosophical Theories and Applications, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
3. Mandelbaum, M. (1964), Philosophy, Science, and Sense Perception, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
4. Mayo, D.G. (1996), Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
5. Mayo, D.G. (2005), “Evidence as Passing Severe Tests: Highly Probed vs. Highly Proved,” pp. 95–127 in P. Achinstein (ed.), Scientific Evidence: Philosophical Theories and Applications, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
6. Mill, J.S. (1888), A System of Logic, 8th edition, Harper and Bros., New York.
7. Newton, I. (1999), Principia (trans. I.B. Cohen and A. Whitman), University of California Press.
8. Peirce, C.S. (1931–1935), Collected Papers, C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss (eds.), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.