The Steppengrille (Gryllus spec./assimilis): Selective Filters and Signal Mismatch on Two Time Scales

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 9, 2012, Pages

  Rothbart, Matti Michael ^a   Hennig, Ralf Matthias ^a  

^a HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL COMMUNICATION; ARTICLE; BREED; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GRYLLIDAE; GRYLLUS ASSIMILIS; MALE; MATE CHOICE; NONHUMAN; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RESPONSE TIME; SEX DIFFERENCE; SIGNAL DETECTION; SINGING; SOUND DETECTION; SOUND INTENSITY;

ANIMALS; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; ECUADOR; FEMALE; GRYLLIDAE; MALE; SINGING; TIME FACTORS; VOCALIZATION, ANIMAL;

GRYLLIDAE; GRYLLUS; GRYLLUS ASSIMILIS;

EID: 84866056702     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043975     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Gerhardt HC, Huber F (2002) Acoustic communication in insects and anurans. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
2. Huber F, Moore TEM, Loher W (1989) Cricket behavior and neurobiology. Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, NY.
3. Otte D, (1992) The evolution of cricket songs. J Orthoptera Res 1: 25-49.
4. Desutter- Grandcolas L, Robillard T, (2003) Phylogeny and the evolution of calling songs in Gryllus (Insecta, Orthoptera, Gryllidae). Zool. Scripta 32: 173-183.
5. Schildberger K, (1984) Temporal selectivity of identified auditory neurons in the cricket brain. J Comp Physiol A 155: 171-185.
6. Hedwig B, Poulet JFA, (2004) Complex auditory behaviour emerges from simple reactive steering. Nature 430: 781-785.
7. Hennig RM, (2009) Walking in Fourier's space: algorithms for the computation of periodicities in song patterns by the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. J Comp Physiol A 195: 971-987.
8. Hennig RM, (2003) Acoustic feature extraction by cross-correlation in crickets? J Comp Physiol A 189: 589-598.
9. Doherty JA, (1985) Trade-off phenomena in calling song recognition and phonotaxis in the cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus (Orthoptera, Gryllidae). J Comp Physiol 156: 787-801.
10. Trobe D, Schuster R, Römer H, (2011) Fast and reliable decisions for a dynamic song parameter in field crickets. J Comp Physiol A 197: 131-135.
11. Grobe B, Rothbart MM, Hanschke A, Hennig RM, (2012) Auditory processing at two time scales by the cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus. J Exp Biol 215: 1681-1690.
12. Deily JA, Schul J, (2009) Seletive phonotaxis in Neoconocephalus nebrascensis (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae): call recognition at two temporal scales. J Comp Physiol A 195: 31-37.
13. Weissman DB, Walker TJ, Gray AD, (2009) The field cricket Gryllus assimilis and two new sister species (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 102: 367-380.
14. Walker TJ, (1975) Effects of temperature on rates in poikilotherm nervous systems: evidence from the calling songs of meadow katydids (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae: Orchelimum) and reanalysis of published data. J Comp Physiol 101: 57-69.
15. Schneider E, Hennig RM, (2012) Temporal resolution for calling song signals by female crickets, Gryllus bimaculatus. J Comp Physiol A 198: 181-191.
16. Weber T, Thorson J, Huber F, (1981) Auditory behaviour of the cricket. I. Dynamics of compensated walking and discrimination paradigms on the Kramer treadmill. J Comp Physiol 141: 215-232.
17. Verburgt L, Ferguson JWH, Weber T, (2008) Phonotactic response of female crickets on the Kramer treadmill: methodology, sensory and behavioural implications. J Comp Physiol A 194: 79-96.
18. Poulet JFA, Hedwig B, (2005) Auditory orientation in crickets: Pattern recognition controls reactive steering. PNAS 102: 15665-15669.
19. Schul J, (1998) Song recognition by temporal cues in a group of closely related bushcricket species (genus Tettigonia). J Comp Physiol A183: 401-410.
20. Barber CB, Dobkin DP, Huhdanpaa HT, (1996) The Quickhull algorithm for convex hulls. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software 22: 469-483.
21. Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp S (1998) Principles of animal communication. Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts.
22. Gerhardt HC, (1991) Female mate choice in treefrogs: static and dynamic acoustic criteria. Anim Behav 42: 615-635.
23. Kostarakos K, Hennig RM, Römer H, (2009) Two matched filters and the evolution of mating signals in four species of cricket. Frontiers in Zoology 2009, 6: 22 doi:10.1186/1742-9994-6-22.
24. Alexander RD, (1968) Life cycle origins, speciation and related phenomena in crickets. Quart Rev Biol 43: 1-41.
25. Schmidt AKD, Römer H, (2011) Solutions to the cocktail party problem in insects: selective filters, spatial release from masking and gain control in tropical crickets. PLoS ONE 6 (12):: e28593 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0028593.
26. Endler JA, (1992) Signals, signal conditions, and the direction of evolution. American Naturalist 139: 125-153.
27. Anderson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
28. Hack MA, (1998) The energetics of male mating strategies in field crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllinae: Gryllidae). J Insect Behav 11: 853-867.
29. Hennig RM, (1990) Neuronal control of the forewings in two different behaviours: Stridulation and flight in the cricket Teleogryllus commodus. J Comp Physiol A 167: 617-627.
30. Wiley C, Ellison CK, Shaw KL, (2012) Widespread genetic linkage of mating signals and preferences in the Hawaiian cricket Laupala. Proc R Soc B 279: 1203-1209.
31. Zuk M, Rotenberry JT, Tinghitella RM, (2006) Silent night: adaptive disappearance of a sexual signal in a parasitized population of field crickets. Biol Lett 2006: 521-524.