Infants' integration of featural and numerical information

Infant Behavior and Development

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 705-710

  Brez, Caitlin C ^a   Colombo, John ^b   Cohen, Leslie ^c  

^a INDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive development; Feature integration; Number discrimination

Indexed keywords

AGE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; HABITUATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFANT; MALE; MENTAL TASK; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

CHILD DEVELOPMENT; COGNITION; CONCEPT FORMATION; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84866054018     PISSN: 01636383     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2012.07.003     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Banich M.T. Executive function: The search for an integrated account. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2009, 18:89-94.
2. Booth A.E., Waxman S.R. Object names and object functions serve as cues to categories for infants. Developmental Psychology 2002, 38:948-957.
3. Booth A.E., Waxman S.R. Word learning is 'smart': Evidence that conceptual information affects preschoolers' extension of novel words. Cognition 2002, 84:B11-B22.
4. Booth A.E., Waxman S.R. Deja vu all over again: Re-revisiting the conceptual status of early word learning: Comment on Smith and Samuelson (2006). Developmental Psychology 2006, 42:1344-1346.
5. Brannon E.M., Lutz D., Cordes S. The development of area discrimination and its implications for number discrimination in infancy. Developmental Science 2006, 9:F59-F64.
6. Brez C.C., Colombo J. Your eyes say "no," but your heart says "yes": Behavioral and psychophysiological indices in infant quantitative processing. Infancy 2012, 17:445-454.
7. Casasola M., Cohen L.B. Infant categorization of containment, support, and tight-fit spatial relationships. Developmental Science 2002, 5:247-264.
8. Clearfield M.W., Mix K.S. Number versus contour length in infants' discrimination of small visual sets. Psychological Science 1999, 10:408-411.
9. Clearfield M.W., Mix K.S. Amount versus number: Infants' use of area and contour length to discriminate small sets. Journal of Cognition and Development 2001, 2:243-260.
10. Cohen L.B., Atkinson D.J., Chaput H.H. Habit 2000: A new program for testing infant perception and cognition. (Version 1.0) [Computer software] 2000, The University of Texas, Austin.
11. Colombo J. Infant attention grows up: The emergence of a developmental cognitive neuroscience perspective. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2002, 11:196-200.
12. Colombo J., Cheatham C.L. The emergence and basis of endogenous attention in infancy and early childhood. Advances in Child Development and Behavior 2006, 34:283-322.
13. Colombo J., Kannass K.N., Walker D., Brez C.C. The development of attention in infancy and early childhood: Implications for early childhood and early intervention. Infants, Toddlers, and Families in Poverty: Research Implications for Early Child Care 2012, Guilford Press, New York. S.L. Odom, E.P. Pungello, N. Gardner-Neblett (Eds.).
14. Feigenson L. A double-dissociation in infants' representations of object arrays. Cognition 2005, 95:B37-B48.
15. Feigenson L., Carey S. Tracking individuals via object-files: Evidence from infants' manual search. Developmental Science 2003, 6:568-584.
16. Feigenson L., Carey S., Spelke E. Infants' discrimination of number vs. continuous extent. Cognitive Psychology 2002, 44:33-66.
17. Garon N., Bryson S.E., Smith I.M. Executive function in preschoolers: A review using an integrative framework. Psychological Bulletin 2008, 134:31-60.
18. Halberda J., Mazzocco M., Feigenson L. Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement. Nature 2008, 455:665-669.
19. Izard V., Dehaene-Lambertz G., Dehaene S. Distinct cerebral pathways for object identity and number in human infants. PLoS Biology 2008, 6:275-285.
20. Libertus M.E., Brannon E.M. Behavioral and neural basis of number sense in infancy. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2009, 18:346-351.
21. Oakes L.M. Using habituation of looking time to assess mental processes in infancy. Journal of Cognition and Development 2010, 11:255-268.
22. Oakes L.M., Kannass K.N., Shaddy D.J. Developmental changes in endogenous control of attention: The role of target familiarity on infants' distraction latency. Child Development 2002, 73:1644-1655.
23. Oakes L.M., Madole K.L. The future of infant categorization research: A process-oriented approach. Child Development 2000, 71:119-126.
24. Peterson S.A., Simon T.J. Computational evidence for the subitizing phenomenon as an emergent property of the human cognitive architecture. Cognitive Science 2000, 24:93-122.
25. Starkey P., Cooper R.G. Perception of numbers by human infants. Science 1980, 210:1033-1035.
26. Starkey P., Spelke E.S., Gelman R. Numerical abstraction by human infants. Cognition 1990, 36:97-127.
27. Strauss M.S., Curtis L.E. Infant perception of numerosity. Child Development 1981, 52:1146-1152.
28. Trick L.M., Pylyshyn Z.W. Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited capacity preattentive stage in vision. Psychological Review 1994, 101:80-102.
29. Werker J.F., Cohen L.B., Lloyd V.L., Casasola M., Stager C.L. Acquisition of word-object associations by 14-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology 1998, 34:1289-1309.
30. Xu F., Spelke E.S., Goddard S. Number sense in human infants. Developmental Science 2005, 8:88-101.