Probing the innovative quality system structure model for NPD process based on combining DANP with MCDM model

International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control

Volumn 8, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 5745-5762

  Kuan, Meng Jong ^a   Hsiang, Chia Chun ^a   Tzeng, Gwo Hshiung ^a,b  

^a KAINAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL CHIAO TUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Decision making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL); DEMATEL based ANP (DANP); New product development (NPD) process; VIKOR

Indexed keywords

COMPETITIVE ENVIRONMENT; DECISION MAKING TRIAL AND EVALUATION LABORATORIES; DEMATEL; DEMATEL-BASED ANP (DANP); EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; PERFORMANCE GAPS; PRODUCT LIFE CYCLES; PRODUCT VALUE; QUALITY ASSESSMENT; QUALITY FACTORS; QUALITY SYSTEMS; TOTAL PERFORMANCE; VIKOR;

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; MANAGERS; QUALITY ASSURANCE; SURVEYS;

PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 84866049113     PISSN: 13494198     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. T. Levitt, Exploit the product life cycle, Harvard, Business Review, vol.43, no.6, pp.81-94, 1965.
2. D. A. Garvin, What does product quality really mean, Sloan Management Review, vol.26, no. l, pp.25-39, 1984.
3. Product Development and Management Association (PDMÅ), http://www.pdma.org/, 2010.
4. C. M. Kuan, ISO 9001:2008 Quality Management System and System Documentation, Taiwan of Society for Quality, 2009.
5. P. Sampson, Can consumer create new products, Journal of the Market Research Society, vol. 12, no. l, pp.42-52, 1970.
6. W. E. Souder, Managing relations between R&D and marketing in new product development projects, Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol.5, no. l, pp.6-19, 1988.
7. P. Kotler, Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation, and Control, Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1994.
8. J. Poolton and I. Barclay, New product development from past research to future application, In-dustrial Marketing Management, vol.27, no.3, pp.197-212, 1998.
9. M. Swink, Threats to new product manufacturability and the effects of development team integration processes, Journal of Operations Management, vol. 17, no.6, pp.691-709, 1999.
10. G. G. Büyüközkan and O. Feyzolu, A fuzzy-logic-based decision-making approach for new product development, International Journal of Production Economics, vol.90, no. l, pp.27-45, 2004.
11. G. L. Urban and J. R. Hauser, Design and Marketing of New Products, Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1980.
12. R. G. Cooper, Perspective: Third-generation new product processes, Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol.11, no. l, pp.3-14, 1994.
13. R. G. Cooper, Overhauling the new product process, Industrial Marketing Management, vol.25, no.6, pp.465-482, 1996.
14. ISO-International Organization for Standardization, http://www.iso.org/iso/en/ISOOnline.front page, 2010.
15. R. G. Cooper, Product Leadership: Creating and Launching Superior New Products, 1st Edition, Yuanliou Press, Taipei, 2000.
16. Kume and Hitoshi, The Quality Management of Design Development, 1st Edition, Jung-Wei Devel-opment Center, Taipei, 1999.
17. K. Kitagawa, A reliability program case-history on design review, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, vol.34, no.3, pp.212-215, 1985.
18. S. B. Benjamin, System Engineering Management, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1991.
19. I. Takashi and M. Tetsuharu, Design Review, Japan Science and Technology Co., Ltd. 1981.
20. S. F. Yang, Quality Management, 2nd Edition, Huatai culture Co., Ltd., 2006.
21. J. C. Dai, Quality Management, Sanmin Press, Taipei, 1981.
22. C. C. Lu and M. C. Tian, International Quality Management-ISO 2000 Establishment and Audit Quality Control System, Hsinglu Press, Taipei, 2001.
23. Y. P. Ou Yang, H. M. Shieh, J. D. Leu and G. H. Tzeng, A novel hybrid MCDM model combined with DEMATEL and ANP with applications, International Journal of Operations Research, vol.5, no.3, pp.1-9, 2008.
24. G. H. Tzeng, C. H. Chiang and C. W. Li, Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: A novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL, Expert Systems with Applica-tions, vol.32, no.4, pp. 1028-1044, 2007.
25. C. L. Lin and G. H. Tzeng, A value-created system of science (technology) park by using DEMATEL, Expert Systems with Applications, vol.36, no.6, pp.9683-9697, 2009.
26. C. L. Lin, M. S. Hsieh and G. H. Tzeng, Evaluating vehicle telematics system by using a novel MCDM techniques with dependence and feedback, Expert Systems with Applications, vol.37, no. 10, pp.6723-6736, 2010.
27. Y. C. Chen, H. P. Lien and G. H. Tzeng, Measures and evaluation for environment watershed plans using a novel hybrid MCDM model, Expert Systems with Applications, vol.37, no.2, pp.926-938, 2010.
28. M. Tamura, H. Nagata and K. Akazawa, Extraction and systems analysis of factors that prevent safety and security by structural models, Proc. of the 41st SICE Annual Conference, Osaka, Japan, 2002.
29. T. L. Saaty, Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA, 1996.
30. W. S. Lee, G. H. Tzeng and C. M. Cheng, Using novel MCDM methods based on Fama-French three-factor model for probing the stock selection, APIEMS, pp. 1460-1474, 2009.
31. International Organization for Standardization, IS()-9001:2000 Quality Management System-Re-quirements, Switzerland, 2005.
32. K. Holt, H. Geschka and G. Peterlongo, Need Assessment: A Key to User-Oriented Product Inno-vation, Wiley, Chichester, 1984.