Forecasting with imprecise probabilities

ISIPTA 2011 - Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Imprecise Probability: Theories and Applications

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 317-326

  Seidenfeld, Teddy ^a   Schervish, Mark J ^a   Kadane, Joseph B ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

maximin; Brier score; Coherence; Dominance; Eadmissibility; Proper scoring rules

Indexed keywords

BRIER SCORE; DOMINANCE; EADMISSIBILITY; MAXIMIN; PROPER SCORING RULES;

COHERENT LIGHT; PROBABILISTIC LOGICS;

FORECASTING;

EID: 84866042736     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Cozman, F. and T.Seidenfeld (2009) Independence for Full Conditional Measures, Graphoids and Bayesian Networks. In Foundations of the Formal Sciences VI. B.Lowe, E.Pacuit, and J-W Romeijn (eds.). College Publications: London.
2. de Finetti, B. (1974) Theory of Probability (vol. 1). John Wiley: New York.
3. de Finetti, B. (1981) The role of dutch books and proper scoring rules. Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 32: 55-56.
4. de Finetti, B (2008) Philosophical Lectures on Probability (A.Mura, Ed.) Springer: United States.
5. Gilio, A. (1996) Algorithms for Conditional Probability Assessments. In Bayesian Analysis in Statistics and Econometrics. D.A.Berry, K.MChaloner, and J.K.Geweke (eds.) John Wiley: New York, pp. 29-39.
6. Herron, T., T.Seidenfeld, and L.Wasserman (1997) Divisive Conditioning: Further Results on Dilation. Phil. Sci., 64: 411-444.
7. Levi, I. (1974) On Indeterminate Probabilities. J.Phil 71: 391-418.
8. Levi, I. (1980) The Enterprise of Knowledge. MIT Press: Cambridge.
9. Predd, J., R.Seiringer, E.H. Lieb, D.Osherson, V.Poor, and S.Kulkarni (2009) Probabilistic coherence and proper scoring rules. IEEE Trans. Information Theory 55; 4786-4792.
10. Regazinni, E. (1987) De Finetti's Coherence and Statistical Inference. Ann. Stat. 15: 845-864.
11. Savage, L.J. (1971) Elicitation of personal probabilities and expectations. J. Amer. Stat. Assoc. 66: 783-801.
12. Schervish, M.J. (1989) A general method for comparing probability assessors. Ann. Stat. 17: 1856-1879.
13. Schervish, M.J., T.Seidenfeld and J.B.Kadane (1990) State-dependent Utilities. J.A.S.A. 85: 840- 847.
14. Schervish, M.J, T.Seidenfeld, and J.B.Kadane (2009) Proper Scoring Rules, Dominated Forecasts, and Coherence. Decision Analysis 6, 4: 202-221.
15. Seidenfeld, T., M.J.Schervish, and J.B.Kadane (1990) Decisions without Ordering. In Acting and Reflecting. W.Sieg (ed.) Kluwer Publishing: Dordrecht, pp. 143-170.
16. Seidenfeld, T., M.J.Schervish, and J.B.Kadane (2010) Coherent choice functions under uncertainty. Synthese 172, 1: 157-176. Presented at ISIPTA-07.
17. Seidenfeld, T., M.J.Schervish, and J.B.Kadane (05/2011) Dominating Countably Many Forecasts. Technical Report, Statistics Department, CMU.
18. Smith, C.A.B. (1961) Consistency in Statistical Inference and Decision. J.R.S.S. B 23: 1-25.
19. Walley, P. (1991) Statistical Reasoning with Imprecise Probabilities. Chapman and Hall, London.
20. Williams, P.M. (1975) Notes on conditional previsions. I. J. ApproximateReasoning 4: 366-383.