What Works for Them? Preservice Teachers' Perceptions of Their Learning from Video Cases

Action in Teacher Education

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 27-38

  Yadav, Aman ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84866039546     PISSN: 01626620     EISSN: 21586098     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01626620.2008.10463467     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Ausubel, D. P., 1968. Educational psychology: A cognitive view, New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
2. Brinkerhoff, J. D., Klein, J. D., and Koroghlanian, C. M., 2001. Effects of overviews and computer experience on learning from hypertext. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 25 (4): 427–440.
3. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., and Duguid, P., 1989. Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18 (1): 32–42.
4. Carter, K., 1999. “ What is a case? What is not a case? ”. In Who learns what from cases and how: The research base for teaching and learning with case, Edited by: Lundeberg, M. A., Levin, B. B., and Harrington, H. L., 165–175. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Clark, C. M., 1988. Asking the right questions about teacher preparation: Contributions of research on teacher thinking. Educational Researcher, 17 (2): 5–12.
6. Copeland, W. D., and Decker, D. L., 1996. Video cases and the development of meaning making in preservice teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12 (5): 467–481.
7. Grossman, P. L., 1992. “ Teaching and learning with cases: Unanswered questions ”. In Case methods in teacher education, Edited by: Shulman, J. H., 227–239. New York: Teachers College Press.
8. Holt-Reynolds, D., 1992. Personal history-based beliefs as relevant prior knowledge in course work. American Educational Research Journal, 29: 325–349.
9. Kleinfeld, J., 1988. Learning to think like a teacher: The study of cases, Fairbank: University of Alaska. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED308039)
10. Levin, B. B., 1995. Using the case method in teacher education: The role of discussion and experience in teachers' thinking about cases. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11 (1): 63–79.
11. Lundeberg, M. A., 1999. “ Discovering teaching and learning through cases ”. In Who learns what from cases and how: The research base for teaching and learning with cases, Edited by: Lundeberg, M. A., Levin, B. B., and Harrington, H., 3–23. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Lundeberg, M. A., Levin, B. B., and Harrington, H. L., 1999. Who learns what from cases and how? The research base for teaching and learning with cases, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Mayer, R. E., 1975. Different problem-solving competencies established in learning computer programming with and without meaningful models. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67 (6): 725–734.
14. Merseth, K. K., 1999. The case for cases in teacher education, Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
15. Merseth, K. K., and Lacey, C. A., 1993. Weaving stronger fabric: The pedagogical promise of hypermedia and case methods in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 9 (3): 283–299.
16. Oliver, S., Hughes, J., Norman, P., Pearson, P. D., Roehler, L. R., Ferdig, R. E., Reading classroom explorer: Using hypermedia to showcase exemplary teaching practices. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association. Seattle, WA. April.
17. Rosaen, C., Koehler, M., Phillips, M., Pardo, L., Yadav, A., and Johnson, M., 2005. Literacy Teaching and Learning [Multimedia software] (Charles Ruggerio, Developer), East Lansing: Michigan State University, College of Education.
18. Shulman, L., 1986. Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15 (2): 4–14.
19. Shulman, L. S., 1992. “ Towards a pedagogy of cases ”. In Case methods in teacher education, Edited by: Shulman, J. H., 1–33. New York: Teachers College Press.
20. Spiro, R. J., Feltovich, R. J., Jacobson, M. J., and Coulson, R. L., 1992. “ Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains ”. In Constructivism and the technology of instruction, Edited by: Duffy, T. M., and Jonassen, D. H., 57–75. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Strauss, A., and Corbin, J., 1998. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 2nd ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. Sykes, G., and Bird, T., 1992. Teacher education and the case ideas. Review of Research in Education, 18: 457–521.
23. Teale, W. H., Leu, D. J., and Labbo, L. D., 2002. The CTELL project: New ways technology can help educate tomorrow's reading teachers. The Reading Teacher, 55 (7): 654–659.
24. Vygotsky, L. S., 1978. Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25. Wang, J., and Hartley, K., 2003. Video technology as a support for teacher education reform. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 11 (1): 105–138.
26. Weinstein, C. S., 1990. Prospective elementary teacher' beliefs about teaching: Implications for teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 6: 279–290.
27. Williams, S. M., 1992. Putting case-based instruction into context: Examples from legal and medical education. Journal of Learning Sciences, 2 (4): 367–427.
28. Yadav, A., and Koehler, M. J., 2007. The role of epistemological beliefs in preservice teachers' interpretation of video cases of early-grade literacy instruction. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 15 (3): 335–361.
29. Yadav, A., Lundeberg, M. A., DeSchryver, M., Dirkin, K. H., Schiller, N., Maier, K., 2007. Teaching science with case studies: A national survey of faculty perceptions on the benefits and challenges of using cases. Journal of College Science Teaching, 37: 35–39.