Variation in patient perceptions of healthcare provider endorsement of cardiac rehabilitation courtney

Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 192-197

  Tsui, Kwan Yee ^a   Segaram, Shamila Shanmuga ^a   Jamnik, Veronica ^a   Wu, Gilbert ^a   Grace, Sherry L ^a  

^a YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cardiac rehabilitation; Endorsement; Healthcare provider

Indexed keywords

5 POINT LIKERT SCALE; ADULT; ARTICLE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH SURVEY; HEART REHABILITATION; HUMAN; INCOME; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT REFERRAL; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; SOCIAL STATUS; SURGEON;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; COMMUNICATION; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DIRECTIVE COUNSELING; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ODDS RATIO; PERCEPTION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PSYCHOMETRICS; REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION; SOCIAL CLASS; STATISTICS AS TOPIC;

EID: 84866023386     PISSN: 19327501     EISSN: 1932751X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/HCR.0b013e318255a39d     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Taylor RS, Brown A, Ebrahim S, et al. Exercise-based rehabilitation for patients with coronary heart disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Med. 2004;116:682-692.
2. Suaya JA, Stason WB, Ades PA, Normand S-LT, Shepard DS. Cardiac rehabilitation and survival in older coronary patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:25-33.
3. Cooper AF, Jackson G, Weinman J, Horne R. Factors associated with cardiac rehabilitation attendance: A systematic review of the literature. Clin rehabil. 2002;16:541-552.
4. Jackson L, Leclerc J, Erskine Y, Linden W. Getting the most out of cardiac rehabilitation: A review of referral and adherence predictors. Heart. 2005;91:10-14.
5. Grace SL. Cardiac rehabilitation II: referral and participation. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2002;24:127-134.
6. Grace SL, Gravely-Witte S, Brual J, et al. Contribution of patient and physician factors to cardiac rehabilitation enrollment: A prospective multilevel study. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2008;15:548-556.
7. Ades PA, Waldmann ML, Polk DM, Coflesky JT. Referral patterns and exercise response in the rehabilitation of female coronary patients aged greater than or equal to 62 years. Am J Cardiol. 1992;69:1422-1425.
8. Grace SL, Russell KL, Reid RD, et al. Effect of cardiac rehabilitation referral strategies on utilization rates. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171:235-241.
9. Dillman DA. Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1978:247.
10. Canadian Association of Cardiac Rehabilitation. Canadian Guidelines for Cardiac Rehabilitation and Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: Translating Knowledge Into Action. 3rd ed. Winnipeg, Manitoba: Canadian Association of Cardiac Rehabilitation; 2009.
11. Adler NE, Epel ES, Castellazzo G, Ickovics Jr. Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: preliminary data in healthy white women. Health Psychol. 2000;19:586-592.
12. Hlatky MA, Boineau RE, Higginbotham MB, et al. A brief selfadministered questionnaire to determine functional capacity (the Duke Activity Status Index). Am J Cardiol. 1989;64: 651-654.
13. Alter DA, Oh PI, Chong A. Relationship between cardiac rehabilitation and survival after acute cardiac hospitalization within a universal health care system. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev. 2009; 16:102-113.
14. Grace SL, Chessex C, Arthur H, et al. Systematizing inpatient referral to cardiac rehabilitation 2010: Canadian Association of Cardiac Rehabilitation and Canadian Cardiovascular Society Joint Position Paper. Can J Cardiol. 2011;27:192-199.