Digital photography in plastic surgery: The importance of standardization in the era of medicolegal issues

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 130, Issue 3, 2012, Pages

  Aveta, Achille ^a   Filoni, Angela ^a   Persichetti, Paolo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY CAMPUS BIO MEDICO   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; ITALY; LEGAL ASPECT; LETTER; PHOTOGRAPHY; PLASTIC SURGERY; STANDARD;

HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; ITALY; PHOTOGRAPHY; SURGERY, PLASTIC;

EID: 84866015127     PISSN: 00321052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31825dc515     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Sanniec K, Macias L, Zuhlke T, Casey W, Leighton W, Rebecca A. Adherence to photographic standards: A review of plastic surgeon websites (Abstract). Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 128(Suppl):41.
2. Yavuzer R, Smirnes S, Jackson IT, Schmidt GH. Guidelines for standard photography in plastic surgery. Ann Plast Surg. 2001; 46:293-300.
3. Flowers RS, Flowers SS. Diagnosing photographic distortion: Decoding true postoperative contour after eyelid surgery. Clin Plast Surg. 1993;20:387-392.
4. Parker WL, Czerwinski M, Sinno H, Loizides P, Lee C. Objective interpretation of surgical outcomes: Is there a need for standardizing digital images in the plastic surgery literature? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120:1419-1423.
5. Persichetti P, Simone P, Langella M, Marangi GF, Carusi C. Digital photography in plastic surgery: How to achieve reasonable standardization outside a photographic studio. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2007;31:194-200.