Evidence for discrete-state processing in recognition memory

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 109, Issue 36, 2012, Pages 14357-14362

  Province, Jordan M ^a   Rouder, Jeffrey N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

Discrete state models; Dual process models; Memory models; Receiver operator characteristic analysis; Signal detection

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DISCRETE STATE MODEL; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RECOGNITION; SIGNAL PROCESSING; TASK PERFORMANCE;

HUMANS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MEMORY; MISSOURI; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84865987011     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1103880109     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Yonelinas AP (2002) The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. J Mem Lang 46:441-517.
2. Hintzman DL (1988) Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace model. Psychol Rev 95:528-551.
3. McClelland JL, Chappell M (1998) Familiarity breeds differentiation: A subjective-likelihood approach to the effects of experience in recognition memory. Psychol Rev 105:724-760. (Pubitemid 128456529)
4. Murdock BB (1982) A theory for the storage and retrieval of item and associative information. Psychol Rev 89:609-626.
5. Shiffrin RM, Steyvers M (1997) A model for recognition memory: REM-retrieving effectively from memory. Psychon Bull Rev 4:145-166. (Pubitemid 127459383)
6. Anderson JR, Lebiere C (1998) The Atomic Component of Thought (Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ).
7. Sikström S, Jönsson F (2005) A model for stochastic drift in memory strength to account for judgments of learning. Psychol Rev 112:932-950.
8. Kinchla RA (1994) Comments on Batchelder and Riefer's multinomial model for source monitoring. Psychol Rev 101:166-771, discussion 172-176.
9. Slotnick SD, Dodson CS (2005) Support for a continuous (single-process) model of recognition memory and source memory. Mem Cognit 33:151-170. (Pubitemid 350042530)
10. Yonelinas AP, Parks CM (2007) Receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) in recognition memory: A review. Psychol Bull 133:800-832.
11. Macmillan NA, Creelman CD (2005) Detection Theory: A User's Guide (Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ).
12. Luce RD (1963) A threshold theory for simple detection experiments. Psychol Rev 70: 61-79.
13. Bröder A, Schütz J (2009) Recognition ROCs are curvilinear - or are they? On premature arguments against the two-high-threshold model of recognition. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 35:587-606.
14. Erdelder E, Buchner A (1998) Process-dissociation measurement models: Threshold theory or detection theory. J Exp Psychol Gen 127:83-96.
15. Malmberg KJ (2002) On the form of ROCs constructed from confidence ratings. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 28:380-387.
16. Yonelinas AP (1994) Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process model. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 20:1341-1354.
17. Akaike H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Automat Contr 19:716-723.
18. Schwartz G (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat 6:461-464.
19. Rouder JN, Speckman PL, Sun D, Morey RD, Iverson G (2009) Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychon Bull Rev 16:225-237.
20. Coltheart M (1981) The MRC psycholinguistic database. Q J Exp Psychol 33A:497-505.
21. Kucera H, Francis WN (1967) Computational Analysis of Present-Day American English (Brown Univ Press, Providence, RI).
22. Nelson DL, McEvoy CL, Schreiber TA (1998) The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Available at http://www.usf.edu/FreeAssociation.
23. Kleiner M, Brainard D, Pelli D (2007) What's new in Psychtoolbox-3? Perception, 36: ECVP Abstract Supplement.
24. Nelder JA, Mead R (1965) A simplex method for function minimization. Comput J 7: 308-313.
25. Fletcher R, Reeves CM (1964) Function minimization by conjugate gradients. Comput J 7:148-154.
26. Reed TRC, Cressie NAC (1988) Goodness-of-Fit Statistics for Discrete Multivariate Data (Springer, New York).
27. Qin J, Raye CL, Johnson MK, Mitchell KJ (2001) Source ROCs are (typically) curvilinear: Comment on Yonelinas (1999). J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 27:1110-1115. (Pubitemid 33683975)