Usability of a novel clinician interface for genetic results

Journal of Biomedical Informatics

Volumn 45, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 950-957

  Neri, Pamela M ^a   Pollard, Stephanie E ^a   Volk, Lynn A ^a   Newmark, Lisa P ^b   Varugheese, Matthew ^a   Baxter, Samantha ^c   Aronson, Samuel J ^a   Rehm, Heidi L ^b,c,d   Bates, David W ^a,b,d  

^a PARTNERS HEALTHCARE   (United States)

^b BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c LABORATORY FOR MOLECULAR MEDICINE   (United States)

^d HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical decision support; Electronic health records; Genomics; Personalized medicine

Indexed keywords

APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT; CLINICAL CARE; CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT; DECISION SUPPORT APPLICATIONS; DESIGN PROCESS; DEVELOPMENT PROCESS; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; GENETIC DATA; GENETIC INFORMATION; GENETIC VARIANTS; GENOMICS; HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS; NOVEL APPLICATIONS; PERSONALIZED MEDICINES; POTENTIAL USERS; RAPID GROWTH; USABILITY TESTS;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; GENES; HEALTH CARE; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; INVESTMENTS;

USABILITY ENGINEERING;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC DATABASE; GENETIC SCREENING; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; GENETIC TESTING; GENOMICS; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALIZED MEDICINE;

EID: 84865982402     PISSN: 15320464     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2012.03.007     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Scheuner M.T., de Vries H., Kim B., Meili R.C., Olmstead S.H., Teleki S. Are electronic health records ready for genomic medicine?. Genet Med 2009, 11:510-517.
2. Hamburg M.A., Collins F.S. The path to personalized medicine. N Engl J Med 2010, 363:301-304.
3. Lee C., Morton C.C. Structural genomic variation and personalized medicine. N Engl J Med 2008, 358:740-741.
4. Caleshu C., Day S., Rehm H.L., Baxter S. Use and interpretation of genetic tests in cardiovascular genetics. Heart 2010, 96:1669-1675.
5. Genetic testing practice guidelines: translating genetic discoveries into clinical care. Genetics & Public Policy Center; 2008.
6. Aronson S.J., Clark E.H., Babb L.J., Baxter S., Farwell L.M., Funke B.H., et al. The GeneInsight Suite: a platform to support laboratory and provider use of DNA-based genetic testing. Hum Mutat 2011, 32:532-536.
7. Baars M.J., Henneman L., Ten Kate L.P. Deficiency of knowledge of genetics and genetic tests among general practitioners, gynecologists, and pediatricians: a global problem. Genet Med 2005, 7:605-610.
8. Richards C.S., Bale S., Bellissimo D.B., Das S., Grody W.W., Hegde M.R., et al. ACMG recommendations for standards for interpretation and reporting of sequence variations: revisions. Genet Med 2007, 10(2008):294-300.
9. Baroudi J., Olson M., Ives B. An empirical study of the impact of user involvement on system usage and information satisfaction. Commun. ACM 1986, 29:232-238.
10. Rosenbaum S., Wilson C.E., Jokela T., Rohn J.A., Smith T.B., Vredenburg K. Usability in practice. User experience lifecycle - evolution and revolution, CHI '02 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems 2002, ACM, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, p. 898-903.
11. Gosbee J.W. Conclusion: you need human factors engineering expertise to see design hazards that are hiding in " plain sight!" Jt Comm J Qual Saf 2004, 30:696-700.
12. Rogers ML, Patterson E, Chapman R, Render M. Usability testing and the relation of clinical information systems to patient safety. In: Henriksen K, Battles JB, Marks ES, Lewin DI, editors. Advances in patient safety: from research to implementation. Concepts and methodology, vol. 2, Rockville, MD; 2005.
13. Ash J.S., Sittig D.F., Poon E.G., Guappone K., Campbell E., Dykstra R.H. The extent and importance of unintended consequences related to computerized provider order entry. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007, 14:415-423.
14. Bates D.W., Kuperman G.J., Wang S., Gandhi T., Kittler A., Volk L., et al. Ten commandments for effective clinical decision support: making the practice of evidence-based medicine a reality. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2003, 10:523-530.
15. Kushniruk A.W., Patel V.L. Cognitive and usability engineering methods for the evaluation of clinical information systems. J Biomed Inform 2004, 37:56-76.
16. Armijo D, McDonnell C, Werner K. Electronic health record usability: evaluation and use case framework. In: U.S.D.o.H.a.H. Services, editor. Rockville, MD: AHRQ Publications; 2009.
17. Karsh B.T., Weinger M.B., Abbott P.A., Wears R.L. Health information technology: fallacies and sober realities. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2010, 17:617-623.
18. Schumacher R, Lowry S. NIST guide to the processes approach for improving the usability of electronic health records. In: U.S.D.o. Commerce, editor. National Institute of Standards and Technology; 2010.
19. Saleem J.J., Russ A.L., Sanderson P., Johnson T.R., Zhang J., Sittig D.F. Current challenges and opportunities for better integration of human factors research with development of clinical information systems. Yearb Med Inform 2009, 48-58.
20. Smelcer J., Miller-Jacobs H., Kantrovich L. Usability of electronic medical records. J Usability Stud 2009, 4:70-84.
21. Aronson S.J., Clark E.H., Varugheese M., Baxter S., Babb L.J., Rehm H.L. Communicating new knowledge on previously reported genetic variants. Genet Med 2012.
22. Jordan D.M., Kiezun A., Baxter S.M., Agarwala V., Green R.C., Murray M.F., et al. Development and validation of a computational method for assessment of missense variants in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Am J Hum Genet 2011, 88:183-192.
23. GeneInsight Executive Summary. Partners HealthCare System, Inc.; 2010.
24. Nielsen J. Heuristic evaluation. Usability inspection methods 1994, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY. J. Nielsen, R.L. Mack (Eds.).
25. TechSmith Corporation, Morae, Okemos, MI.
26. Jaspers M.W., Steen T., van den Bos C., Geenen M. The think aloud method: a guide to user interface design. Int J Med Inform 2004, 73:781-795.
27. Dumas JS, Redish J. A practical guide to usability testing. Rev. ed., Exeter, England: Intellect Books; Portland, Or.; 1999.
28. Brooke J. SUS: A-quick and dirty usability scale. Usability evaluation in industry 1996, 189-194. Taylor & Francis, London, UK. P.W. Jordan, B. Thomas, B.A. Weerdmeester, A.L. McClelland (Eds.).
29. Bangor A., Kortum P., Miller J. Determining what individual SUS scores mean: adding an adjective rating scale. J Usability Stud 2009, 4:114-123.
30. Sauro J. Measuring usability with the System Usability Scale (SUS); 2011.
31. Nielsen J., Levy J. Measuring usability: preference vs. performance. Commun. ACM 1994, 37:66-75.
32. Bailey R. Performance vs. preference. Hum Factors Ergon Soc Ann Meeting Proc 1993, 37:282-286.
33. Virzi R.A. Refining the test phase of usability evaluation: how many subjects is enough?. Hum Factors 1992, 34:457-468.