How does neurobiological research influence psychoanalytic treatmentsclinical observations and reflections from a study on the interface of clinical psychoanalysis and neuroscience

American Journal of Psychoanalysis

Volumn 72, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 269-286

  Taubner, Svenja ^a   Buchheim, Anna ^b   Rudyk, Roman ^c   Kächele, Horst ^a   Bruns, Georg ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KASSEL   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF INNSBRUCK   (Austria)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BREMEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

empirical research; impact of research on psychoanalytic treatment; study group of psychoanalysts

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; DEPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROBIOLOGY; PSYCHOANALYSIS; PSYCHOANALYTIC THEORY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RESEARCH; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; DEPRESSIVE DISORDER; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROBIOLOGY; PSYCHOANALYSIS; PSYCHOANALYTIC THEORY; PSYCHOANALYTIC THERAPY; RESEARCH; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84865976113     PISSN: 00029548     EISSN: 15736741     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/ajp.2012.17     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Alonso, A. (2009). Clinicians' love/hate relationship with clinical research. In R.A. Levy & J. Ablon (Eds.), Handbook of evidence-based psychodynamic psychotherapy: Bridging the gap between science and practice (pp. 385-388). New York: Humana Press
2. Bednar, R. L. & Shapiro, J. G. (1970). Professional research commitment: A symptom or a syndrome. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 34 (3), 323-326
3. Bowlby, J. (1979). Psychoanalysis as art and science. International Review of Psychoanalysis , 6 (1), 3-14
4. Buchheim, A., Kächele, H., Cierpka, M., Münte, T., Kessler, H., Wiswede, D., Taubner, S., Bruns, G. & Roth, G. (2008). Psychoanalyse und Neurowissenschaften. Neurobiologische Veränderungsprozesse bei psychoanalytischen Behandlungen von depressiven Patienten [Psychoanalysis and neuroscience. Neurobiological processes of change in psychoanalytic treatment of depressive patients]. Nervenheilkunde, 27 (5), 441-445 (Pubitemid 351928168)
5. Busch, F. N., Milrod, B. L., Rudden, M., Shapiro, T., Roiphe, J., Singer, M. & Aronson, A. (2001). How treating psychoanalysts respond to psychotherapy research constraints. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 49 (3), 961-983
6. Fonagy, P. (2002). Section B: Reflections on psychoanalytic research problems-An anglo-saxon view. In P. Fonagy, E.E. Jones, H. Kächele, J.F. Clarkin, R. Krause, R. Perron, A.J. Gerber & L. Allison (Eds.), An open door review on outcome studies in psychoanalysis, 2nd edn., (pp. 21-53). London: International Psychoanalytic Association
7. George, C. & West, M. (2001). The development and preliminary validation of a new measure of adult attachment: The adult attachment projective. Attachment and Human Development, 3 (1), 30-61 (Pubitemid 32294026)
8. George, C. & West, M. (2012). The adult attachment projective picture system. New York: Guilford Press
9. Green, A. (1996). What kind of research for psychoanalysis? Newsletter of the International Psychoanalytic Association, 5, 10-14
10. Green, A. (2000). Science and science fi ction in infant research. In J. Sandler, A.M. Sandler & R. Davies (Eds.), Clinical and observational psychoanalytic research: Roots of a controversy. Andre Green & Daniel Stern (pp. 41-72). London: Karnac
11. Kächele, H., Schachter, J. & Thom ä, H. (Eds.) (2009). From psychoanalytic narrative to empirical single case research: Implications for psychoanalytic practice. New York: Routledge
12. Kessler, H., Taubner, S., Buchheim, A., Münte, T. F., Stasch, M., Kächele, H., Roth, G., Heinecke, A., Erhard, P., Cierpka, M. & Wiswede, D. (2011). Individualized and clinically derived stimuli activate limbic structures in depression: An FMRI study. PLoS One, 6 (1), e15712
13. Linden, D. (2006). How psychotherapy changes the brain-The contribution of functional neuroimaging. Molecular Psychiatry, 11 (6), 528-538
14. Luyten, P., Blatt, S. J. & Corveleyn, J. (2006). Minding the gap between positivism and hermeneutics in psychoanalytic research. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 54 (2), 571-610 (Pubitemid 43875055)
15. Morrow-Bradley, C. & Elliott, R. (1986). Utilization of psychotherapy research by practicing psychotherapists. American Psychologist, 41 (2), 188-197
16. OPD-Task-Force (2008). Operationalized psychodynamic diagnosis OPD-2. Cambridge: Hogrefe
17. Perron, R. (2002). Section A: Reflections on psychoanalytic research problems-The French-speaking view. In P. Fonagy, E.E. Jones, H. Kächele, J.F. Clarkin, R. Krause, R. Perron, A.J. Gerber & L. Allison (Eds.), An open door review on psychoanalytic outcome studies, 2nd edn., (pp. 9-20). London: International Psychoanalytic Association
18. Protz, J., Kächele, H. & Taubner, S. (2011). Die Ambivalenz an der Therapieforschung. Beweggründe und Erfahrungen von Psychoanalytiker und Psychoanalytikerinnen [The ambivalence of the therapy research motivations and experiences of psychoanalysts]. Forum der Psychoanalyse, 28 (1), 67-88
19. Roffman, J., Marci, C., Glick, D., Dougherty, D. & Rauch, S. (2005). Neuroimaging and the functional neuroanatomy of psychotherapy. Psychological Medicine, 35 (10), 1385-1398 (Pubitemid 41430677)
20. Shedler, J. (2002). A new language for psychoanalytic diagnosis. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 50 (2), 429-456
21. Stuhr, U., Leuzinger-Bohleber, M. & Beutel, M. (Eds.) (2001). Langzeit-Psychotherapie. Perspektiven für Therapeuten und Wissenschaftler [Long-term psychotherapy: Perspectives for therapists and researchers]. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer
22. Wynne, M. E., Susman, M., Ries, S., Birringer, J. & Katz, L. (1994). A method for assessing therapists' recall of in-session events. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 41 (1), 53-57