Is the theory of planned behaviour an appropriate model for human fertility?

Vienna Yearbook of Population Research

Volumn , Issue 1, 2011, Pages 11-18

  Morgan, S Philip ^a   Bachrach, Christine A ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865856499     PISSN: 17284414     EISSN: 17285305     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1553/populationyearbook2011s11     Document Type: Note

References (23)

1. Bandura, A. 1977. Self-efficacy- toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review 84(2): 191-215.
2. Becker, G. 1991. A treatise on the family. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
3. D'Andrade, R.G. 1995. The development of cognitive anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Fishbein, M. and I. Azjen 2010. Predicting and changing behavior. New York: Taylor & Francis.
5. Giddens, A. 1979. Central problems in social theory: action, structure, and contradiction in social analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.
6. Giddens, A. 1984. The constitution of society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
7. Harzing, A.W. 2010. Publish or perish. Third version available at www.harzing.com/pop.htm
8. Henshaw, S.K. 1998. Unintended pregnancy in the United States. Family Planning Perspectives 30(1): 24-29,46.
9. Hermalin, A.I., R. Freedman, Te-Hsiung Sun and Ming-Cheng Chang 1979. Do intentions predict fertility? The experience in Taiwan, 1967-74. Studies in Family Planning 10(3): 75-95.
10. Johnson-Hanks, J., C. Bachrach, S.P. Morgan and H.P. Kohler 2011. Understanding family change and variation: structure, conjuncture, and action. New York: Springer.
11. Malle B.F., L.J. Moses, D.A. Baldwin and J.S. Bruner 2003. Intentions and intentionality: foundations of social cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Miller, W.B. 2011. Comparing the TPB and the T-D-I-B framework. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research Vol 9:19-29.
13. Miller, W.B. 2003. The role of nurturant schemas in human reproduction. In The biodemography of fertility, ed. J.L. Rodgers and H.-P. Kohler, 43-55.Boston: Kluwer.
14. Miller W.B., M.R. Sable and J.J. Beckmeyer 2009. Preconception motivation and pregnancy wantedness: pathways to Toddler attachment security. Journal of Marriage and Family 71(5): 1174-1192.
15. Morgan, S.P. and H. Rackin 2010. The correspondence of fertility intentions and behavior in the U.S.. Population and Development Review 36(1): 91-118.
16. Strauss, C. and N. Quinn 1997. A cognitive theory of cultural meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Sewell, W.H. 1992. A theory of structure: duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology 98(1): 1-29.
18. Sewell, W.H. 2005. Logics of history. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19. Ventura, S.J., J.C. Abma, W.D. Mosher and S.K. Henshaw 2008. Estimated pregnancy rates by outcome for the United States, 1990-2004. National Vital Statistics Reports 56(15). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.
20. Westoff, C.F. and N.B. Ryder 1977. The predictive validity of reproductive intentions. Demography 14(4): 431-453.
21. Williams L and J. Abma 2000. Birth wantedness reports: a look forward and a look back. Social Biology 47(3-4): 147-163.
22. Williams L, J. Abma and L.J. Piccinino 1999. The correspondence between intention to avoid childbearing and subsequent fertility: a prospective analysis. Family Planning Perspectives 31(5): 220-227.
23. Wilson, E.O. 1998. Consilience: the unity of knowledge. New York.