Bladder neck preservation during classic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy - Point of technique and preliminary results

Wideochirurgia I Inne Techniki Maloinwazyjne

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 89-95

  Chłosta, Piotr L ^a,b,c   Drewa, Tomasz ^c,d   Jaskulski, Jarosław ^c   Dobruch, Jakub ^a   Varkarakis, John ^e   Borówka, Andrzej ^a  

^a The Medical University of Postgraduate Education   (Poland)

^b JAN KOCHANOWSKI UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

^c Institute of Oncology   (Poland)

^d NICOLAUS COPERNICUS UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

^e Department of Urology   (Greece)

Author keywords

Bladder neck; Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy; Stress urinary incontinence

Indexed keywords

AERATION; ANASTOMOSIS; ARTICLE; BLADDER NECK PRESERVATION; BLADDER WALL; BLEEDING; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; BLOOD VESSEL; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; FOLLOW UP; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LAPAROSCOPE; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOBILIZATION; MUSCLE TISSUE; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROSTATE ADENOMA; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; SEMINAL VESICLE; STRESS INCONTINENCE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TROCAR; URETHRA;

EID: 84865833957     PISSN: 18954588     EISSN: 22990054     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5114/wiitm.2011.25981     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Kaska Ł, Śledzi?ski Z, Kobiela J, et al. Comparision of quality of life after laparoscopic and open procedures. Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques 2006; 2: 77-86.
2. Rembiasz K, Bobrzyński A, Budzyński A, et al. Analysis of complications of laparoscopic management of abdominal diseases related to extended indications. Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques 2010; 5: 53-9.
3. Budziński R, Michalik M, Frask A. Education in laparoscopic surgery. Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques 2008; 3: 22-9.
4. Strzałka M, Bobrzyński A, Budzyński A, et al. Open or laparoscopic appendectomy? Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques 2009; 4: 110-4.
5. Frask A, Michalik M, Orłowski M. Port-side implantations after minimal invasive surgery - etiology and protection. Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques 2008; 1: 17-21.
6. Chlosta P, Drewa T, Siekiera J, et al. Lymph node dissection during laparoscopic (LRC) and open (ORC) radical cystectomy due to muscle invasive bladder urothelial cancer (pT2-3, TCC). Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques (e-pub 2011, ahead of print).
7. Marsh DW, Lepor H. Predicting continence following radical prostatectomy. Curr Urol Rep 2001; 2: 248-52.
8. Twiss C, Martin S, Shore R, Lepor H. A continence index predicts the early return of urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 2000; 164: 1241-7.
9. Goeman L, Salomon L, Hoznek A, et al. Radical laparoscopic prostatectomy: should we do bladder neck preservation or a reconstruction? Curr Urol Rep 2006; 7: 93-5.
10. Licht MR, Klein EA, Tuason L, Levin H. Impact of bladder neck preservation during radical prostatectomy on continence and cancer control. Urology 1994; 44: 883-7.
11. Gomez CA, Soloway MS, Civantos F, Hachiya T. Bladder neck preservation and its impact on positive surgical margins during radical prostatectomy. Urology 1993; 42: 689-93.
12. Gaker DL, Gaker LB, Stewart JF, Gillenwater JY. Radical prostatectomy with preservation of urinary continence. J Urol 1996; 156: 445-9.
13. Borkowski T, Leszczyński D, Borkowski A. Application of a stapling device for hemostasis of Santorini venous complex during radical prostatectomy - preliminary results. Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques 2006; 4: 175-9.
14. Bollens R, Vanden Bossche M, Roumeguere T et al. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Results after 50 cases. Urology 2000; 55: 904-8.
15. Simonin O, Savoie PH, Serment G, et al. Urinary incontinence following open prostatectomy or laparoscopy for local prostate cancer. A review of relevant literature. Prog Urol 2010; 20: 239-50.
16. Arroua F, Toledano H, Gaillet S, et al. Radical prostatectomy with bladder neck preservation: surgical margins and urinary continence. Prog Urol 2008; 18: 304-10.
17. Freire MP, Weinberg AC, Lei Y, et al. Anatomic bladder neck preservation during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of technique and outcomes. Eur Urol 2009; 56: 972-80.
18. Stolzenburg JU, Kallidonis P, Hicks J, et al. Effect of bladder neck preservation during endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy on urinary continence. Urol Int 2010; 85: 135-8.
19. Eastham JA, Kattan MW, Rogers E, et al. Risk factors for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 1996; 156: 1707-13.
20. Moore KN, Truong V, Estey E, Voaklander DC. Urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: can men at risk be identified preoperatively? J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2007; 34: 270-9.
21. Selli C, De Antoni P, Moro U, et al. Role of bladder neck preservation in urinary continence following radical retropubic prostatectomy. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2004; 38: 32-7.
22. Azuma H, Ibuki N, Inamoto T, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: six key points of operative skill for achieving better urinary continence. Nippon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi 2010; 101: 1-12.
23. Asimakopoulos AD, Annino F, D'Orazio A, et al. Complete periprostatic anatomy preservation during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP): the new pubovesical complex-sparing technique. Eur Urol 2010; 58: 407-17.
24. Braslis KG, Petsch M, Lim A, et al. Bladder neck preservation following radical prostatectomy: continence and margins. Eur Urol 1995; 28: 202-8.
25. Marcovich R, Wojno KJ, Wei JT, et al. Bladder neck-sparing modification of radical prostatectomy adversely affects surgical margins in pathologic T3a prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2003; 43: 461-6.
26. Srougi M, Nesrallah LJ, Kauffmann JR, et al. Urinary continence and pathological outcome after bladder neck preservation during radical retropubic prostatectomy: a randomized prospective trial. J Urol 2001; 165: 815-8.
27. Bianco FJ, Grignon DJ, Sakr WA, et al. Radical prostatectomy with bladder neck preservation: impact of a positive margin. Eur Urol 2001; 40: 65-9.