Democratizing production through open source knowledge: From open software to open hardware

Media, Culture and Society

Volumn 34, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 691-708

  Powell, Alison ^a  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

democratic media production; design; knowledge exchange; monopolies of knowledge; open source cultures; political economy

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865798823     PISSN: 01634437     EISSN: 14603675     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0163443712449497     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Bauwens MParallel Visions of P2P production: Governance,Organization and the New Economies. Moore PKaratzogianni A, ed. 2009:.
2. Bazzichelli TNetworking: The Net as Artwork. Aarhus: Digital Aesthetics Research Centre, Aarhus University; 2008:.
3. Benkler YThe Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 2006:.
4. Bowker G,Star SLSorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1999:.
5. Buechley L,Hill BM.Lilypad in the wild: how hardware's long tail is supporting new engineering and design communities. Presented at DIS 2010; 2009Aarhus Denmark; 2009.
6. Callon M.Pour une sociologie des controverses technologiques.Fundamenta Scientiae. 1981;2 (3): 381-399.
7. Cammaerts B.Disruptive sharing in a digital age: rejecting neoliberalism?.Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies. 2011;25 (1): 47-62.
8. Coleman G,Golub A.Hacker practice: moral genres and the cultural articulation of liberalism.Anthropological Theory. 2008;8 (3): 255-277.
9. Deleuze G,Guattari FA Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 1987:.
10. Douglas SInventing American Broadcasting, 1899-1922. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1987:.
11. Downing JContesting Media Power: Alternative Media in a Networked World. Couldry NCurran J, ed. Toronto: Rowman and Littlefield; 2003:.
12. Dunbar-HesterC (2008) Propagating technology, propagating community? Low-power radio activism and technological negotiation in the U.S., 1996-2006. PhD Thesis, Cornell University, USA.
13. Dyer-Witheford NCyber-Marx: Cycles and Circuits of Struggle in High-technology Capitalism. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press; 1999:.
14. Feenberg AQuestioning Technology. London: Routledge; 1999:.
15. Fuchs C.Structuration theory and self-organization.Systemic Practice and Action Research. 2003;16 (2): 133-167.
16. Galloway AR,Thacker EThe Exploit: A Theory of Networks. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 2007:.
17. Gauntlett DMaking is Connecting: The Social Meaning of Creativity, from DIY and Knitting to YouTube and Web 2.0. London: Polity Press; 2010:.
18. Giddens AThe Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Bristol: Polity Press; 1984:.
19. Gristock JUniversity of Sussex, Department of Biology and Environmental Sciences; 2008:.
20. Haring KHam Radio's Technical Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2006:.
21. Hertz G.Arduino microcontrollers and the Queen's Hamlet: utilitarian and hedonized DIY practices in contemporary digital culture. Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture (ARCADIA); 2011Stoughton, WI: Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture; 2011. 44.
22. Himanen PThe Hacker Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. New York: Random House; 2001:.
23. HunterM (2004) Culture war. Working Papers series, SSRN. Available at: http://ssrn.com/papers/abstract=586463 (accessed May 2012).
24. Innis HThe Bias of Communication. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 1951:.
25. Jasanoff SStates of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. Jasanoff S, ed. New York: Routledge; 2004:13-45.
26. Karatzogianni A,Michaelides GParallel Visions of P2P Production: Governance, Organization and the New Economies. Moore PKaratzogianni A, ed. 2009:.
27. Langlois A,Dubois FAutonomous Media: Activating Resistance and Dissent. Montreal: Cumulus Press; 2005:.
28. Lave J,Wenger ESituated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1991:.
29. Lessig LFree Culture: How Big Media Uses Technology and the Law to Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity. New York: Penguin Books; 2004:.
30. Levy SGarden City, NY: Doubleday; 1984:.
31. LinY (2004) Hacking practices and software development: a social worlds analysis of ict innovation and the role of free/libre open source software. PhD Thesis, University of York, UK.
32. Make magazine (2010) Your green project. Available at: http://makezine.com/tagyourgreen/?id=95. Accessed 10 January 2011.
33. Mansell R,Berdou EInternational Handbook of Internet Research. Hunsinger JAllen MKlastrup L, ed. Amsterdam: Springer; 2008:.
34. Neumann JPersonal Interview on OHANDA process. Germany: Berlin; 2009:.
35. Nissenbaum H.Hackers and the contested ontology of cyberspace.New Media & Society. 2004;6 (2): 195-217.
36. Onion R.Reclaiming the machine: an introductory look at steampunk in everyday practice.Neo-Victorian Studies. 2008;1 (1): 138-163.
37. OpenCores (2011) Main page. Available at: http://opencores.org. Accessed March 2011.
38. OHANDA (Open Hardware and Design Alliance) (2009) Main page. Available at: http://www.ohanda.org. Accessed 5 January 2010 (page subsequently changed; original page available at the internet archive).
39. Open Hardware Roadmap (2011) Main page. Available at: http://ohroadmap.org. Accessed 15 November 2011.
40. RubowE (2008) Open source hardware. UCSD Working Paper. Available at: http://cseweb.ucsd.edu/classes/fa08/cse237a/topicresearch/erubow_tr_report.pdf. Accessed 20 November 2011.
41. Terranova T.Free labor: producing culture for the digital economy.Social Text. 2000;18 (2): 33-58.
42. Söderberg JHacking Capitalism: The Free and Open Source Software Movement. London: Routledge; 2008:.
43. Star SL.Infrastructure and ethnographic practice: working on the fringes.Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems. 2002;14 (2): 107-122.
44. Star SL,Griesemer JR.Institutional ecology, 'translations', and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology 1907-1939.Social Studies of Science. 1989;19:387-420.
45. Stark DThe Twenty-first-century Firm. DiMaggio P, ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2001:69-104.
46. Stallman ROpen Sources - Voices from the Open Source Revolution. DiBona COckman SStone M, ed. London: O'Reilly and Associates; 1999:53-70.
47. Ratto M.Critical making: conceptual and material studies in technology and social life.The Information Society. 2011;27 (4): 252-260.
48. Turner F.Where the counterculture met the new economy: the WELL and the origins of virtual community.Technology and Culture. 2005;46 (3): 485-512.
49. Open Design Now: How Design Can No Longer Be Exclusive. Van Abel BEvers LKlassen RTroxler P, ed. Amsterdam: BIS Publishers; 2011:.
50. Wallis C,Qiu JL,Ling R.Alternative mobile handsets and grassroots innovation in the global south: a critical examination. Paper presented at the Association for Internet Researchers Conference; 2009Milwaukee, WI; 2009.
51. Weber SThe Success of Open Source. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2004:.
52. Zittrain JThe Future of the Internet and How to Stop It. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 2008:.
53. Žižek SIn Defense of Lost Causes. London: Verso; 2008:.