Can Alberta infant motor scale and milani comparetti motor development screening test be rapid alternatives to bayley scales of infant development-II at high-risk infants

Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 196-199

  Yíldírím, Zeynep Hobay ^a   Aydínlí, Nur ^a   Ekici, Baríş ^a   Tatlí, Burak ^a   Çalíşkan, Mine ^a  

^a ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Alberta infant motor scale; bayley scales of infant development II; high risk infant; milani comparetti motor development screening test

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANADA; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; INFANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOTONEURON; MOTOR DEVELOPMENT; NEWBORN; PSYCHOLOGICAL RATING SCALE; SCREENING TEST;

EID: 84865795415     PISSN: 09722327     EISSN: 19983549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4103/0972-2327.99714     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Barbara J, Kliegman RM, Kliegman S. The high-risk infant. In: Behrman RE, Kliegman RM, JeNson HB, editors. Nelson Text book of Pediatrics. 17 th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2004. p. 547-50.
2. Forrest CB, Guralnic MJ. Effectiveness of developmental intervention in the first five years of life. Pediatr Clin North Am 1991;38:1513-28.
3. Spittle AJ, Doyle LW, Boyd RN. A systematic review of the clinimetric properties of neuromotor assessments for preterm infants during first year of life Dev Med Child Neurol 2008;50: 254-66.
4. Campos D, Santos DC, Gonçalves VM, Goto MM, Arias AV, Brianeze AC, et al. Agreement between scales for screening and diagnosis of motor development at 6 months. J Pediatr (Rio J) 2006;82:470-4.
5. Bayley N. Manual for bayley scales of infant development. 2nd ed. San Antoino TX: The Psycohological Corporation; 1993.
6. Black MM, Matula K. Essentials of bayley scales of ínfant development-II assessment. New-York: John Wiley and Sons; 2000.
7. Piper MC, Darrah J. Motor assessment of the developing infant. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1994.
8. Stuberg W. Milani-comparetti motor development screening test for infants and young children-A manuel. 3 rd ed. Meyer Children's Rehabilitation Institute, Omaha, Nebraska, USA: University of Nebraska Medical Center; 1992.
9. Milani-Comparetti A, Gidoni EA. Routine developmental examination in normal and retarded children. Dev Med Child Neurol 1967;9:631-8.
10. Jackson BJ, Needelman H, Roberts H, Willet S, McMorris C. Bayley scales of infant development screening test-gross motor subtest: Efficacy in determining need for services. Pediatr Phys Ther 2012;24:58-62.
11. Blauw-Hospers CH, De Graaf-Peters VB, Dirks T, Bos AF, Hadders-Algra M. Does early intervention in infants at high risk for a developmental motor disorder improve motor and cognitive development? Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2007;31:1201-12.
12. Spittle AJ, Orton J, Doyle LW, Boyd R. Early developmental intervention programs post hospital discharge to prevent motor and cognitive impairments in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;2:CD005495.
13. Provost B, Heimerl S, McClain C, Kim NH, Lopez BR, Kodituwakku P. Concurrent validity of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development II Motor Scale and the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-2 in children with developmental delays. Pediatr Phys Ther 2004;16:149-56.
14. Harris SR, Megens AM, Backman CL, Hayes VE. Stability of the Bayley II Scales of Infant Development in a sample of low-risk and high-risk infants. Dev Med Child Neurol 2005;47:820-3.
15. Stuberg WA, White PJ, Miedaner JA, Dehne PR. Item reliability of the Milani-Comparetti Motor Development Screening Test. Phys Ther 1989;69:328-35.
16. Almeida KM, Dutra MV, Mello RR, Reis AB, Martins PS. Concurrent validity and reliability of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale in premature infants. J Pediatr (Rio J) 2008;84:442-8.
17. Jeng SF, Yau KT, Chen LC, Hsiao SF. Alberta infant motor scale: Reliability and validity when used on preterm infants in Taiwan. Phys Ther 2000;80:168-78.
18. Darah J, Piper M. Assessment of gross motor skills of at risk infants: Predictive validity of the Alberta infant motor scale. Dev Med Child Neurol 1998;40:485-91.
19. Snyder P, Eason JM, Philibert D, Ridgway A, McCaughey T. Concurrent validity and reliability of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale in infants at dual risk for motor delays. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 2008;28:267-82.
20. Syrengelas D, Siahanidou T, Kourlaba G, Kleisiouni P, Bakoula C, Chrousos GP. Standardization of the Alberta infant motor scale in full-term Greek infants: Preliminary results. Early Hum Dev 2010;86:245-9.
21. Pin TW, de Valle K, Eldridge B, Galea MP. Clinimetric properties of the alberta infant motor scale in infants born preterm. Pediatr Phys Ther 2010;22:278-86.