The SIST-M: Predictive validity of a brief structured clinical dementia rating interview

Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 225-231

  Okereke, Olivia I ^a   Pantoja Galicia, Norberto ^b   Copeland, Maura ^a   Hyman, Bradley T ^a   Wanggaard, Taylor ^a   Albert, Marilyn S ^c   Betensky, Rebecca A ^b   Blacker, Deborah ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Alzheimer disease; CDR; dementia; instrument; mild cognitive impairment; prediction; psychometric; questionnaire; validity

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CLINICAL DEMENTIA RATING; COGNITION; DEMENTIA; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HAZARD RATIO; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREDICTIVE VALIDITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; RATING SCALE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SURVIVAL;

AGED; ALGORITHMS; AREA UNDER CURVE; DEMENTIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; PSYCHIATRIC STATUS RATING SCALES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROC CURVE;

EID: 84865789168     PISSN: 08930341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/WAD.0b013e318231cd30     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Hughes CP, Berg L, Danzinger WL, et al. A new clinical scale for the staging of dementia. Br J Psychiatry. 1982;140: 566-572.
2. Morris JC. The clinical dementia rating (CDR): Current version and scoring rules. Neurology. 1993;43:2412-2414.
3. The National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC). http://www.alz. washington.edu.
4. Daly E, Zaitchik D, Copeland M, et al. Predicting conversion to Alzheimer disease using standardized clinical information. Arch Neurol. 2000;57:675-680.
5. Dickerson BC, Sperling RA, Hyman BT, et al. Clinical prediction of Alzheimer disease dementia across the spectrum of mild cognitive impairment. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007;64: 1443-1450.
6. Okereke OI, Copeland M, Hyman BT, et al. The SIST-M: Development, reliability and cross-sectional validation of a brief structured Clinical Dementia Rating interview. Arch Neurol. 2011;68:343-350.
7. Schafer KA, Tractenberg RE, Sano M, et al. Reliability of monitoring the clinical dementia rating in multicenter clinical trials. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2004;18:219-222.
8. Heagerty PJ, Zheng Y. Survival model predictive accuracy and ROC curves. Biometrics. 2005;61:92-105.
9. Albert MS, Moss MB, Tanzi R, et al. Preclinical prediction of AD using neuropsychological tests. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2001;7:631-639.
10. Delis DC, Kramer JH, Kaplan E, et al. California Verbal Learning Test, Research Edition,Manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich; 1987.
11. Grober E, Buschke H. Genuine memory deficits in dementia. Dev Neuropsychol. 1987;3:13-36.
12. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. Mini-Mental State: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12:189-198.
13. Reitan RM. Validity of the trail making test as an indicator of organic brain damage. Percept Mot Skills. 1958;8:271-276.
14. Davis HS, Rockwood K. Conceptualization of mild cognitive impairment: A review. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2004;19:313-319.
15. Petersen RC, Thomas RG, Grundman M, et al. Vitamin E and donepezil for the treatment of mild cognitive impairment. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:2379-2388.
16. Storandt M, Grant EA, Miller JP, et al. Longitudinal course and neuropathologic outcomes in original versus revised MCI and in pre-MCI. Neurology. 2006;67:467-473.
17. McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, et al. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: Report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer's disease. Neurology. 1984; 34:939-944.
18. Roman GC, Tatemichi TK, Erkinjuntti T, et al. Vascular dementia: Diagnostic criteria for research studies: Report of the NINDS-AIREN International Workshop. Neurology. 1993;43: 250-260.
19. Neary D, Snowden JS, Gustafson L, et al. Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: A consensus on clinical diagnostic criteria. Neurology. 1998;51:1546-1554.
20. Akaike H. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov BN, Csaki F, eds. Second International Symposium on Information Theory. Budapest: Akademiai Kiado; 1973:267-281.
21. Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. 1974;19: 716-723.
22. Davison AC, Hinkley DV. Bootstrap Methods and Their Application (Cambridge Series in Statistical and Probabilistic Mathematics, No 1). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1997.