Relative contributions of goal representation and kinematic information to self-monitoring by chimpanzees and humans

Cognition

Volumn 125, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 168-178

  Kaneko, Takaaki ^a   Tomonaga, Masaki ^a  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Agency; Chimpanzees; Imitation; Self monitoring; Voluntary action

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CHIMPANZEE; COGNITION; HUMAN; KINEMATICS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELF CONCEPT; SELF MONITORING; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ANIMALS; ATTENTION; BIOMECHANICS; CUES; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEEDBACK, SENSORY; FEMALE; GOALS; HUMANS; MALE; PAN TROGLODYTES; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84865786485     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: 18737838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.07.006     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Benaglia T., Chauveau D., Hunter D.R., Young D.S. Mixtools: An R package for analyzing finite mixture models. Journal of Statistical Software 2009, 32(6):1-29.
2. Blakemore S.J., Frith C.D., Wolpert D.M. Spatio-temporal prediction modulates the perception of self-produced stimuli. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1999, 11(5):551-559.
3. Call J., Carpenter M., Tomasello M. Copying results and copying actions in the process of social learning: Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and human children (Homo sapiens). Animal Cognition 2005, 8(3):151-163.
4. Couchman J.J.(Self-agency in rhesus monkeys. Biology Letters 2011.
5. Eliades S.J., Wang X. Neural substrates of vocalization feedback monitoring in primate auditory cortex. Nature 2008, 453(7198):1102-1106.
6. Fink G.R., Marshall J.C., Halligan P.W., Frith C.D., Driver J., Frackowiak R.S., et al. The neural consequences of conflict between intention and the senses. Brain 1999, 122(Pt 3):497-512.
7. Gallagher S. Philosophical conceptions of the self: Implications for cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2000, 4(1):14-21.
8. Goodale M.A., Pelisson D., Prablanc C. Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the head or perception of target displacement. Nature 1986, 320(6064):748-750.
9. Imamizu H. Prediction of sensorimotor feedback from the efference copy of motor commands: A review of behavioral and functional neuroimaging studies. Japanese Psychological Research 2010, 52(2):107-120.
10. Kaneko T., Tomonaga M. The perception of self-agency in chimpzanzees (Pan troglodytes). Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2011, 278(1725):3694-3702.
11. Kano F., Tomonaga M. How chimpanzees look at pictures: A comparative eye-tracking study. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2009, 276(1664):1949-1955.
12. Knoblich G., Kircher T.T.J. Deceiving oneself about being in control: Conscious detection of changes in visuomotor coupling. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance 2004, 30(4):657-666.
13. Linser K., Goschke T. Unconscious modulation of the conscious experience of voluntary control. Cognition 2007, 104(3):459-475.
14. Liu G., Chua R., Enns J.T. Attention for perception and action: Task interference for action planning, but not for online control. Experimental Brain Research 2008, 185(4):709-717.
15. Musseler J., Sutter C. Perceiving one's own movements when using a tool. Consciousness and Cognition 2009, 18(2):359-365.
16. Myowa-Yamakoshi M., Matsuzawa T. Factors influencing imitation of manipulatory actions in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Journal of Comparative Psychology 1999, 113(2):128-136.
17. Myowa-Yamakoshi M., Matsuzawa T. Imitation of intentional manipulatory actions in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Journal of Comparative Psychology 2000, 114(4):381-391.
18. Nagell K., Olguin R.S., Tomasello M. Processes of social-learning in the tool use of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and human children (Homo sapiens). Journal of Comparative Psychology 1993, 107(2):174-186.
19. Norman D., Shallice T. Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. Consciousness and self-regulation: Advances in research and theory IV 1986, Plenum Press. R. Davidson, R. Swartz, D. Shapiro (Eds.).
20. Pelisson D., Prablanc C., Goodale M.A., Jeannerod M. Visual control of reaching movements without vision of the limb. 2. Evidence of fast unconscious processes correcting the trajectory of the hand to the final position of a double-step stimulus. Experimental Brain Research 1986, 62(2):303-311.
21. Pisella L., Grea H., Tilikete C., Vighetto A., Desmurget M., Rode G., et al. An "automatic pilot" for the hand in human posterior parietal cortex: Toward reinterpreting optic ataxia. Nature Neuroscience 2000, 3(7):729-736.
22. Premack D. Human and animal cognition: Continuity and discontinuity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2007, 104(35):13861-13867.
23. Rilling J.K., Insel T.R. The primate neocortex in comparative perspective using magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Human Evolution 1999, 37(2):191-223.
24. Sakai T., Mikami A., Tomonaga M., Matsui M., Suzuki J., Hamada Y., et al. Differential prefrontal white matter development in chimpanzees and humans. Current Biology: CB 2011, 21(16):1397-1402.
25. Sato A. Both motor prediction and conceptual congruency between preview and action-effect contribute to explicit judgment of agency. Cognition 2009, 110(1):74-83.
26. Sato A., Yasuda A. Illusion of sense of self-agency: Discrepancy between the predicted and actual sensory consequences of actions modulates the sense of self-agency, but not the sense of self-ownership. Cognition 2005, 94(3):241-255.
27. Schoenemann P.T., Sheehan M.J., Glotzer L.D. Prefrontal white matter volume is disproportionately larger in humans than in other primates. Nature Neuroscience 2005, 8(2):242-252.
28. Slachevsky A., Pillon B., Fourneret P., Pradat-Diehl P., Jeannerod M., Dubois B. Preserved adjustment but impaired awareness in a sensory-motor conflict following prefrontal lesions. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2001, 13(3):332-340.
29. Synofzik M., Vosgerau G., Newen A. Beyond the comparator model: A multifactorial two-step account of agency. Consciousness and Cognition 2008, 17(1):219-239.
30. Tennie C., Call J., Tomasello M. Push or pull: Imitation vs. Emulation in great apes and human children. Ethology 2006, 112(12):1159-1169.
31. Tennie C., Call J., Tomasello M. Evidence for emulation in chimpanzees in social settings using the floating peanut task. PLoS One 2010, 5(5):9.
32. Terrace H.S., Metcalfe J. The missing link in cognition. Origins of self-reflective consciousness 2005, Oxford University Press, New York.
33. Tomasello M., Davis-Dasilva M., Camak L., Bard K. Observational learning of tool-use by young chimpanzees. Human Evolution 1987, 2(2):175-183.
34. Tsakiris M., Haggard P., Franck N., Mainy N., Sirigu A. A specific role for efferent information in self-recognition. Cognition 2005, 96(3):215-231.
35. Wegner D.M., Wheatley T. Apparent mental causation - Sources of the experience of will. American Psychologist 1999, 54(7):480-492.
36. Willingham D.B. A neuropsychological theory of motor skill learning. Psychological Review 1998, 105(3):558-584.
37. Wolpert D.M., Ghahramani Z. Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nature Neuroscience 2000, 3:1212-1217.
38. Yoshida K., Saito N., Iriki A., Isoda M. Representation of others' action by neurons in monkey medial frontal cortex. Current Biology 2011, 21(3):249-253.