Theoretical and definitional issues in violence against women

Sourcebook on Violence Against Women

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 3-22

  DeKeseredy, Walter S ^a   Schwartz, Martin D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ONTARIO INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Canada)

^b OHIO UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865776478     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781452224916_n1     Document Type: Chapter

References (132)

1. Adams, A. E., Sullivan, C. M., Bybee, D., & Greeson, M. R. (2008). Development of the scale of economic abuse. Violence Against Women, 15, 563-588. doi:10.1177/1077801208315529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077801208315529
2. Allport, G. W. (1968). The historical background of modern social psychology. In G.Lindzey & E.Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 1-80). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3. Anderson, K. L., & Umberson, D. (2001). Gendering violence: Masculinity and power in men's accounts of domestic violence. Gender & Society, 15, 358-380. doi:10.1177/089124301015003003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089124301015003003
4. Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 651-680. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.5.651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.5.651
5. Bahar, K., & Koss, M. P. (2001). From prevalence to prevention: Closing the gap between what we know about rape and what we do. In C.M.Renzetti, J. L.Edleson, & R. K.Bergen (Eds.), Sourcebook on violence against women (pp. 117-142). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781452224916 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452224916
6. Barnett, O. W., Miller-Perrin, C. L., & Perrin, R. D. (2005). Family violence across the lifespan: An introduction (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Bart, P. B., Miller, P. Y., Moran, E., & Stanko, E. A. (1989). Guest editors' introduction. Gender & Society, 3, 431-436. doi:10.1177/089124389003004002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089124389003004002
8. Beirne, P., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (1991). Criminology. New York: Harcourt Brace.
9. Bergen, R. K. (1996). Wife rape: Understanding the response of survivors and service providers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Bergen, R. K. (2006, February). Marital rape: New research and directions. VAWnet, 1-13.
11. Bograd, M. (1988). Feminist perspectives on wife abuse: An introduction. In K.Yllo & M.Bograd (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse (pp. 11-26). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12. Bonisteel, M., & Green, L. (2005). Implications of the shrinking space for feminist anti-violence advocacy. Retrieved from http://www.crvawc.ca/documents/ShrinkingFeministSpace_AntiViolenceAdvocacy_OCT2005.pdf.
13. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32, 513-531. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.32.7.513 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.32.7.513
14. Brownridge, D. A. (2009). Violence against women: Vulnerable populations. New York: Routledge.
15. Buchbinder, E., & Eisikovits, Z. (2004). Between normality and deviance: The breakdown of batterers' identity following police intervention. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 443-467. doi:10.1177/0886260503262082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0886260503262082
16. Daly, K., & Chesney-Lind, M. (1988). Feminism and criminology. Justice Quarterly, 5, 497-538. doi:10.1080/07418828800089871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07418828800089871
17. Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1988). Homicide. New York: Aldine deGruyter.
18. Dasgupta, S. D. (2002). A framework for understanding women's use of nonlethal violence in intimate relationships. Violence Against Women, 8, 1364-1389. doi:10.1177/107780102237408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/107780102237408
19. DeKeseredy, W. S. (1988a). Woman abuse in dating relationships: The relevance of social support theory. Journal of Family Violence, 3, 1-13. doi:10.1007/BF00994662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00994662
20. DeKeseredy, W. S. (1988b). Woman abuse in dating relationships: The role of male peer support. Toronto: Canadian Scholars' Press.
21. DeKeseredy, W. S. (2000). Current controversies in defining nonlethal violence against women in intimate heterosexual relationships: Empirical implications. Violence Against Women, 6, 728-746. doi:10.1177/10778010022182128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10778010022182128
22. DeKeseredy, W. S. (2009a). Girls and women as victims of crime. In J.Barker (Ed.), Women and the criminal justice system: A Canadian perspective (pp. 313-345). Toronto: Emond Montgomery.
23. DeKeseredy, W. S. (2009b). Patterns of violence in the family. In M.Baker (Ed.), Families: Changing trends in Canada (pp. 179-205). Whitby, ON: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.
24. DeKeseredy, W. S., Alvi, S., Schwartz, M. D., & Perry, B. (1999). Violence against and the harassment of women in Canadian public housing. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 36, 499-516. doi:10.1111/j.1755-618X.1999.tb00961.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-618X.1999.tb00961.x
25. DeKeseredy, W. S., Donnermeyer, J. F., Schwartz, M. D., Tunnell, K. D., & Hall, M. (2007). Thinking critically about rural gender relations: Toward a rural masculinity crisis/male peer support model of separation/divorce sexual assault. Critical Criminology, 15, 295-311. doi:10.1007/s10612-007-9038-0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10612-007-9038-0
26. DeKeseredy, W. S., & Dragiewicz, M. (2007). Understanding the complexities of feminist perspectives on woman abuse: A commentary on Donald G. Dutton's Rethinking domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 13, 874-884. doi:10.1177/1077801207304806 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077801207304806
27. DeKeseredy, W. S., & Dragiewicz, M. (2009). Shifting public policy direction: Gender-focused versus bidirectional intimate partner violence. Report prepared for the Ontario Women's Directorate. Toronto: Ontario Women's Directorate.
28. DeKeseredy, W. S., Ellis, D., & Alvi, S. (2005). Deviance and crime: Theory, research and policy. Cincinnati: LexisNexis.
29. DeKeseredy, W. S., & Flack, W. F. (2007). Sexual assault in colleges and universities. In G.Barak (Ed.), Battleground criminal justice (pp. 693-697). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
30. DeKeseredy, W. S., & MacLeod, L. (1997). Woman abuse: A sociological story. Toronto: Harcourt Brace.
31. DeKeseredy, W. S., Rogness, M., & Schwartz, M. D. (2004). Separation/divorce sexual assault: The current state of social scientific knowledge. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9, 675-691. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2003.08.004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2003.08.004
32. DeKeseredy, W. S., Saunders, D. G., Schwartz, M. D., & Alvi, S. (1997). The meanings and motives for women's use of violence in Canadian college dating relationships: Results from a national survey. Sociological Spectrum, 17, 199-222. doi:10.1080/02732173.1997.9982160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02732173.1997.9982160
33. DeKeseredy, W. S., & Schwartz, M. D. (1993). Male peer support and woman abuse: An expansion of DeKeseredy's model. Sociological Spectrum, 13, 394-414. doi:10.1080/02732173.1993.9982041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02732173.1993.9982041
34. DeKeseredy, W. S., & Schwartz, M. D. (1996). Contemporary criminology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
35. DeKeseredy, W. S., & Schwartz, M.D. (1998). Measuring the extent of woman abuse in intimate heterosexual relationships: A critique of the Conflict Tactics Scales. Harrisburg, PA: VAWnet, the National Online Resource Center on Violence Against Women. Retrieved April 2, 2001, from http://www.vawnet.org.
36. DeKeseredy, W. S., & Schwartz, M. D. (2001). Definitional issues. In C. M.Renzetti, J. L.Edleson, & R.K.Bergen (Eds.), Sourcebook on violence against women (pp. 23-34). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781452224916 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452224916
37. DeKeseredy, W. S., & Schwartz, M. D. (2002). Theorizing public housing woman abuse as a function of economic exclusion and male peer support. Women's Health and Urban Life, 1, 26-45.
38. DeKeseredy, W. S., & Schwartz, M. D. (2005). Masculinities and interpersonal violence. In M. S.Kimmel, J.Hearn, & R. W.Connell (Eds.), Handbook of studies on men & masculinities (pp. 353-366). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781452233833 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452233833
39. DeKeseredy, W. S., & Schwartz, M. D. (2009). Dangerous exits: Escaping abusive relationships in rural America. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
40. DeKeseredy, W. S., Schwartz, M. D., & Alvi, S. (2008). Which women are more likely to be abused? Public housing, cohabitation and separated/divorced women. Criminal Justice Studies: A Critical Journal of Crime, Law, and Society, 21, 283-293. doi:10.1080/14786010802554113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14786010802554113
41. DeKeseredy, W. S., Schwartz, M. D., Fagen, D., & Hall, M. (2006). Separation/divorce sexual assault: The contribution of male peer support. Feminist Criminology, 1, 228-250. doi:10.1177/1557085106288862 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1557085106288862
42. Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. (1979). Violence against wives: A case against the patriarchy. New York: Free Press.
43. Duffy, A., & Momirov, J. (1997). Family violence: A Canadian introduction. Toronto: Lorimer.
44. Dutton, D. G. (2006). Rethinking domestic violence. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
45. Edleson, J., & Brygger, M. (1986). Gender differences in reporting of battering incidences. Family Relations, 35, 377-382. doi:10.2307/584364 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/584364
46. Eisenstein, Z. (1980). Capitalist patriarchy and the case for socialist feminism. New York: Monthly Review Press.
47. Ellis, D. (1987). The wrong stuff: An introduction to the sociological study of deviance. Toronto: Collier Macmillan.
48. Fekete, J. (1994). Moral panic: Biopolitics rising. Montreal: Robert Davies.
49. Fisher, B. (2009). The effects of survey question wording on rape estimates: Evidence from a quasi-experimental design. Violence Against Women, 15, 133-147. doi:10.1177/1077801208329391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077801208329391
50. Follingstad, D. R., Rutledge, L. L., Berg, B. J., Hause, E. S., & Polek, D. S. (1990). The role of emotional abuse in physically abusive relationships. Journal of Family Violence, 5, 107-120. doi:10.1007/BF00978514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00978514
51. Foss, K. (2002, June 27). Men as likely to face abuse from partner, StatsCan says. The Globe and Mail, p. A8.
52. Fox, B. J. (1993). On violent men and female victims: A comment on DeKeseredy and Kelly. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 18, 320-324.
53. Gelles, R. J. (1993). Through a sociological lens: Social structure and family violence. In R. J.Gelles & D. R.Loseke (Eds.), Current controversies in family violence (pp. 31-46). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
54. Gelles, R. J., & Cornell, C. P. (1985). Intimate violence in families. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781452243139 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452243139
55. Gelles, R. J., & Straus, M. A. (1988). Intimate violence: The causes and consequences of abuse in the American family. New York: Simon & Schuster.
56. Gilbert, N. (1994). Miscounting social ills. Society, 31, 18-36. doi:10.1007/BF02693226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02693226
57. Girard, A. (2009). Backlash or equality? The influence of men's and women's rights discourses on domestic violence legislation in Ontario. Violence Against Women, 15, 5-23. doi:10.1177/1077801208328344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077801208328344
58. Godenzi, A., Schwartz, M. D., & DeKeseredy, W. S. (2001). Toward a gendered social bond/male peer support theory of university woman abuse. Critical Criminology, 10, 1-16. doi:10.1023/A:1013105118592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1013105118592
59. Gondolf, E. W. (1999). MCMI results for batterer program participants in four cities: Less "pathological" than expected. Journal of Family Violence, 14, 1-17. doi:10.1023/A:1022843324943 http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1022843324943
60. Gondolf, E. W. (2003). MCMI results for batterers: Gondolf replies to Dutton's response. Journal of Family Violence, 18, 387-389. doi:10.1023/A:1026247515800 http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1026247515800
61. Graham-Bermann, S., & Gross, M. (2008). Ecological models of violence. In C. M.Renzetti & J. L.Edleson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of interpersonal violence (pp. 212-215). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781412963923 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412963923
62. Heckert, D. A., & Gondolf, E. (2000). Assessing assault self-reports by batterer program participants and their partners. Journal of Family Violence, 15, 181-197. doi:10.1023/A:1007594928605 http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1007594928605
63. Heise, L. L. (1998). Violence against women: An integrated, ecological framework. Violence Against Women, 4, 262-290. doi:10.1177/1077801298004003002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077801298004003002
64. Henning, K., & Holdford, R. (2006). Minimization, denial, and victim blaming by batterers: How much does the truth matter? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33, 110-130. doi:10.1177/0093854805282322 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0093854805282322
65. Hilton, N. Z., Harris, G. T., & Rice, M. E. (2000). The functions of aggression by male teenagers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 988-994. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.988
66. Hines, D., & Malley-Morrison, K. (2005). Family violence in the United States: Defining, understanding, and combating abuse. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
67. Hirschi, T. (1989). Exploring alternatives to integrated theory. In S. F.Messner, M. D.Krohn, & A. E.Liska (Eds.), Theoretical integration in the study of deviance and crime (pp. 37-49). Albany: SUNY Press.
68. Holzman, H. R., & Piper, L. (1998). Measuring crime in public housing: Methodological issues and research strategies. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 14, 331-351. doi:10.1023/A:1023057120475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1023057120475
69. Jasinski, J. L. (2001). Theoretical explanations for violence against women. In C. MRenzetti, J. L.Edleson, & R. K.Bergen (Eds.), Sourcebook on violence against women (pp. 5-22). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781452224916 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452224916
70. Jiwani, J. (2000). The 1999 general social survey on spousal violence: An analysis. Retrieved May 1, 2002, from http://www.casac.ca/survey99.htm.
71. Johnson, H. (1996). Dangerous domains: Violence against women in Canada. Scarborough, ON: Nelson Canada.
72. Johnson, M. P. (2008). A typology of domestic violence: Intimate terrorism, violent resistance, and situational couple violence. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
73. Johnson, M. P., & Ferraro, K. (2000). Research on domestic violence in the 1990s: Making distinctions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 948-963. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00948.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00948.x
74. Katz, J. (2006). The macho paradox: Why some men hurt women and how all men can help. Naperville, IL: Sourcebooks.
75. Kelly, L. (1988). Surviving sexual violence. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
76. Kernsmith, P. (2008). Coercive control. In C. M.Renzetti & J. L.Edleson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of interpersonal violence (pp. 133-134). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781412963923 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412963923
77. Kilpatrick, D. G. (2004). What is violence against women? Defining and measuring the problem. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 1209-1234. doi:10.1177/0886260504269679 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0886260504269679
78. Kimmel, M. S. (2000). The gendered society. New York: Oxford University Press.
79. Koss, M. P. (1996). The measurement of rape victimization in crime surveys. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23, 55-69. doi:10.1177/0093854896023001005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0093854896023001005
80. Koss, M. P., Gidycz, C. A., & Wisniewski, W. (1987). The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 455-457. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.50.3.455 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.50.3.455
81. Koss, M. P., Goodman, L. A., Browne, A., Fitzgerald, L. F., Puryear-Keita, G. K., & Russo, N. F. (1994). No safe haven. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
82. LaFlame, M. (2009, August 14). Book review: Dangerous exits: Escaping abusive relationships in rural America. Online Journal of Rural Research and Policy, 1-3.
83. Levinson, D. (1989). Family violence in cross-cultural perspective. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
84. Liddle, A. (1989). Feminist contributions to an understanding of violence against women-three steps forward, two steps back. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 26, 759-775.
85. Littleton, C., & Henderson, C. E. (2009). Evaluation of predictors of PTSD symptomology among college rape victims. Violence Against Women, 15, 148-167. doi:10.1177/1077801208329386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077801208329386
86. Loseke, D. R., Gelles, R. J., & Cavanaugh, M. M. (2005). Controversies in conceptualization. In D. R.Loseke, R. J.Gelles, & M. M.Cavanaugh (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (2nd ed., pp. 1-4). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
87. Maidment, M. R. (2006). Transgressing boundaries: Feminist perspectives in criminology. In W. S.DeKeseredy & B.Perry (Eds.), Advancing critical criminology: Theory and application (pp. 43-62). Lanham, MD: Lexington.
88. Malley-Morrison, K., & Hines, D. A. (2004). Family violence in a cultural perspective: Defining, understanding, and combating abuse. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781452232577 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452232577
89. Messerschmidt, J. W. (1993). Masculinities and crime: Critique and reconceptualization. Lanham, MD: Roman & Littlefield.
90. Mihalic, S. W., & Elliot, D. (1997). If violence is domestic, does it really count? Journal of Family Violence, 12, 293-311. doi:10.1023/A:1022800905045 http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1022800905045
91. Mihorean, K. (2005). Trends in self-reported spousal violence. In K.AuCoin (Ed.), Family violence in Canada: A statistical profile 2005 (pp. 13-32). Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
92. Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., Rutter, M., & Silva, P. A. (2001). Sex differences in antisocial behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511490057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490057
93. Muehlenhard, C. L., Powch, I. G., Phelps, J. L., & Giusti, L. M. (1992). Definitions of rape: Scientific and political implications. Journal of Social Issues, 48, 23-44. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1992.tb01155.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1992.tb01155.x
94. Myers, M. (1997). News coverage of violence against women: Engendering blame. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
95. National Institute of Justice. (2000). Workshop on gender symmetry. Retrieved March 2, 2008, from http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij/topics/crime/violence-against-women/workshops/gendersymmetry.htm.
96. Okun, L. (1986). Woman abuse: Facts replacing myths. Albany: State University of New York Press.
97. Osthoff, S. (2002). But, Gertrude, I beg to differ, a hit is not a hit is not a hit: When battered women are arrested for assaulting their partners. Violence Against Women, 8, 1521-1544. doi:10.1177/107780102237968 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/107780102237968
98. Pence, E., & Dasgupta, S. D. (2006). Re-examining battering: Are all acts of violence against intimate partners the same?Duluth: Praxis International. Retrieved April 17, 2007, from http://www.praxisinternational.org/pages/library/files/pdf/ReexaminingBattering.pdf.
99. Pitts, V. L., & Schwartz, M. D. (1993). Promoting self-blame among hidden rape survivors. Humanity & Society, 17, 383-398.
100. Ptacek, J. (1999). Battered women in the courtroom: The power of judicial response. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
101. Radford, J. (1987). Policing male violence-policing women. In J.Hanmer & M.Maynard (Eds.), Women, violence and social control (pp. 30-45). Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press International.
102. Raphael, J. (2001). Public housing and domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 7, 699-706. doi:10.1177/10778010122182677 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10778010122182677
103. Renzetti, C. M. (1993). On the margins of the malestream (Or, they still don't get it, do they?): Feminist analyses in criminal justice education. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 4, 219-234. doi:10.1080/10511259300086111 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10511259300086111
104. Renzetti, C. M. (1997). Foreword. In W. S.DeKeseredy & L.MacLeod (Eds.), Woman abuse: A sociological story (pp. v-vii). Toronto: Harcourt Brace.
105. Renzetti, C. M. (2008). Feminist theories of interpersonal violence. In C. M.Renzetti & J. L.Edleson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of interpersonal violence (pp. 271-272). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781412963923 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412963923
106. Renzetti, C. M., & Maier, S. L. (2002). Private crime in public housing: Fear of crime and violent victimization among women public housing residents. Women's Health and Urban Life, 1, 46-65.
107. Russell, D. E. H. (1990). Rape in marriage: Expanded and revised edition. New York: Macmillan Press.
108. Saunders, D. G. (1988). Wife abuse, husband abuse, or mutual combat? A feminist perspective on the empirical findings. In K.Yllo & M.Bograd (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse (pp. 90-113). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
109. Schur, E. M. (1984). Labeling women deviant: Gender, stigma, and social control. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
110. Schwartz, M. D. (1988). Ain't got no class: Universal risk theories of battering. Contemporary Crises: Law, Crime and Social Policy, 12, 373-392. doi:10.1007/BF00808168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00808168
111. Schwartz, M. D. (2000). Methodological issues in the use of survey data for measuring and characterizing violence against women. Violence Against Women, 8, 815-838. doi:10.1177/10778010022182164 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10778010022182164
112. Schwartz, M. D., & DeKeseredy, W. S. (1993). The return of the "battered husband syndrome" through the typification of women as violent. Crime, Law and Social Change, 20, 249-265. doi:10.1007/BF01308453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01308453
113. Schwartz, M. D., & DeKeseredy, W. S. (1997). Sexual assault on the college campus: The role of male peer support. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781452232065 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452232065
114. Schwartz, M. D., & Leggett, M. S. (1999). Bad dates or emotional trauma? The aftermath of campus sexual assault. Violence Against Women, 5, 251-271. doi:10.1177/10778019922181211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10778019922181211
115. Scully, D. (1990). Understanding sexual violence. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
116. Sernau, S. (2001). Worlds apart: Social inequalities in a new century. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
117. Smith, M. D. (1994). Enhancing the quality of survey data on violence against women: A feminist approach. Gender and Society, 8, 109-127. doi:10.1177/089124394008001007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089124394008001007
118. Stark, E. (2006). Commentary on Johnson's conflict and control: Gender symmetry and asymmetry in domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 12, 1019-1025. doi:10.1177/1077801206293329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077801206293329
119. Stark, E. (2007). Coercive control: How men entrap women in personal life. New York: Oxford University Press.
120. Steinmetz, S. (1977-78). The battered husband syndrome. Victimology, 3-4, 499-509.
121. Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) Scales. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 75-88. doi:10.2307/351733 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/351733
122. Straus, M. A. (2005). Women's violence toward men is a serious social problem. In D. R.Loseke, R. J.Gelles, & M.Cavanaugh (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (pp. 55-78). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
123. Straus, M. A., & Gelles, R. J. (1986). Societal change and change in family violence from 1975 to 1985 as revealed by two national surveys. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 465-479. doi:10.2307/352033 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/352033
124. Straus, M. A., Gelles, R. J., & Steinmetz, S. K. (1981). Behind closed doors: Violence in the American family. New York: Anchor.
125. Szinovacz, M. E. (1983). Using couple data as a methodological tool: The case of marital violence. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 633-644. doi:10.2307/351668 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/351668
126. Szinovacz, M. E., & Egley, L. C. (1995). Comparing one-partner and couple data on sensitive marital behaviors: The case of marital violence. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 995-1010. doi:10.2307/353418 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/353418
127. Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Extent, nature, and consequences of intimate partner violence: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
128. Totten, M. (2003). Girlfriend abuse as a form of masculinity construction. Men and Masculinities, 6, 70-92. doi:10.1177/1097184X03253138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1097184X03253138
129. Vaux, A. (1985). Variations in social support associated with gender, ethnicity, and age. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 89-110. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1985.tb01118.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1985.tb01118.x
130. Walby, S., & Myhill, A. (2001). New survey methodologies in researching violence against women. British Journal of Criminology, 41, 502-522. doi:10.1093/bjc/41.3.502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjc/41.3.502
131. Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1992). Til death do us part. In J.Radford & D. E. H.Russell (Eds.), Femicide: The politics of woman killing (pp. 83-98). New York: Twayne.
132. Young, J. (1999). The exclusive society. London: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781446222065 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446222065